View Single Post
Old 31 Aug 2007, 22:27 (Ref:2001105)   #103
HORNDAWG
Veteran
 
HORNDAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Oregon
Posts: 8,919
HORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by The359
The B05/40 is still the basic structure for the B06/43 (Fernandez's Acura) and B07/46 (B-K's Mazda). As the email indicates, the change in numbers is just due to the fact that these were chassis built in 2006 and 2007. They are still B05/40's basic chassis design with minor bodywork upgrades.

The same applies to the B06/10 and the B07/17 and B07/18.
But if a A B06/40 or B07/40 are invalid as model #'s why is the original B05/40 designation valid when the same criteria was used in its original model designation???? Why is it not a HU/40??

While I understand what you are saying I would disagree. Where the confusion seems to lie is with the HU-XX designation of the tub. The same exact tub may be used through several different models; example 05/, 06/, 07/ and even across class; example /10 or /40. The tub is not the designator for the car model, the year it is assembled and class it will run is. Another example of this would be that you could have two cars of the same model (B06/10 example) with two different types of tub if they were built during the same year. This is Lola's model designation numeration explanation not mine. Are they wrong?

L.P.
HORNDAWG is offline  
Quote