View Single Post
Old 21 Feb 2012, 14:46 (Ref:3028935)   #1850
Deleted
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
Deleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGD View Post
One thing to remember is that the ALMS is pretty aggressive with BoP.
Overrated aspect... the cars that received in-season BoP in ALMS GT last year were BMW (smaller restrictor which they deserved), Porsche (less/more weight) and if you count the fuel restrictors then Corvette also. Otherwise they were pretty much ACO spec.

If we count out pre-season ACO GT2 adjustments, the in-season ones in ILMC/LMS were: Aston was allowed to run with smaller gurney, Ford was allowed to run with bigger restrictor [at LM] and Lotus gained tons of adjustments. There might be even more because they never updated the BoP-list since May... actually I know it's the case as Lotus said it had lost some of it's breaks prior Silverstone

I like repeating this line: At least IMSA is kind enough to publish all the figures unlike LMS
Deleted is offline  
Quote