That was a great argument. At the end of it I just thought both were wrong by the end!
It was the radio equivalent of a TF110 and chernaudi discussion.
No on covers most sports like the Beeb. They are the standard bearer. The sky coverage is close. The small bit we lost in quality we gained massively in quantity (if you can be bothered). I'd have it back on the Beeb in a heartbeat. I'd sacrifice the quantity if I could chose, but it's not bad where it is.
The sky coverage is like the Beeb coverage! I agree, but where does that leave the Murdoch and Beeb lefty approach theories that you get every time you mention either. It probably shows the theories aren't as true as people's prejudices?