Thread: Rules Future Rule Changes
View Single Post
Old 14 Jun 2022, 06:24 (Ref:4115481)   #3971
Taxi645
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Netherlands
Posts: 988
Taxi645 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridTaxi645 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Should F1 use accelerometers to limit porpoising?


Minimal height is nice, but will have different effectiveness on different cars and will punish teams that did a better job on controlling the issue.


What if they would use accelerometers to control the issue?



So the determine the average amount of oscillating G-force of the current porpoising of the worst effected cars. Then for now (until medically is determined what is the maximum a driver can safely endure for longterm health) half that current porpoising G-force. So set up the following a car may not over the coarse of a lap:


1 Show oscillations in the currently determined porpoising frequency bandwidth for more than say 3 second straight with a predetermined maximum G-force (as said for now for instance half of the current average).


Would that not go straight to the health and safety concern off the drivers without penalising teams who did a better job at controlling it. Sounds like something would not take ages to implement.
Taxi645 is offline  
__________________
Constructive discussion: A conversion where participants are maximally open to yet critical of each others (and their own) arguments, with the intend of enhancing the knowledge, understanding and/or handling of it's subject.
Quote