Thread: Rules Future Rule Changes
View Single Post
Old 21 Apr 2018, 11:52 (Ref:3816786)   #2784
ASCII Man
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
ASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldtony View Post
It would seem that there is potential for at least 2 less entrants ( Ferrari & Merc) if the boards of those companies cannot see justification for putting their R&D budgets into F1.
That is exactly what F1 needs, to cut loose from the stranglehold these two manufacturers have on F1 and finally make a rule set that benefits the sport.

Longer braking distances through perhaps steel brake discs, a vast reduction in wake turbulence possibly through a greater use of ground effect, etc. ...
Having the cars designed AROUND the safety device, instead of plopping something on the existing designs like they have stubbornly done in the past.

There are a multitude of ways to improve the sport, but the only thing truly needed is that whoever is making those decisions decides to grow a pair and stand up to manufacturer extortion.
ASCII Man is offline  
Quote