IC, I'm not sure that's read correctly - I think that the PR says effectively that (a) RLR's request for an injunction preventing Sharp from racing elsewhere has been denied but (b) on the face of it, the evidence as currently presented shows enough merit for the trial to go to jury.
I suspect this is ruling purely on the Rahal (counter)suit, not the original Sharp suit.
While what you say agrees with my point (b), the injunction was pointed the other way per my point (a).
|