Thread: IMSA USCC in 2016 and 2017
View Single Post
Old 10 Oct 2014, 18:50 (Ref:3463066)   #148
August
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Finland
Posts: 99
August should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maelochs View Post
Actually, this is the U.S. manufacturers' dream: a pure branding exercise, with minimal cash outlay. Look at NASCAR, where only the stickers are different, pretty much. Sports car racing is a low-visibility sport, so companies want to get involved for low cash outlays.

Ford and Chevy can stick an engine in a car and get all the publicity they can hope for--and by putting branded bodywork on a spec chassis, they get around the problem of sharing the spotlight with the chassis manufacturer.

Dallara won at Petit, but Coyote definitely won the constructors;' titleā€”but no one anywhere is or ever will talk about that. Chevy won with its "Corvette DP."

The dream of the future for manufacturers is of a huge mass of stupid people glued to their TVs for several hours talking about Chevy and Ford while Riley and Coyote actually fight it out on track.
I don't see it as a problem per se if it's a branding exercise. That happens everywhere. Look at Mercedes buying the former Tyrrell F1 team that was shortly even Honda. And their F1 engine subsidiary was once Ilmor. It means quite a little for some random fan if a race was won by a Coyote, Dallara, or Riley. Most viewers aren't going to buy a racing car. It makes more sense if the cars are known by some road car brands' names and they have some styling cues.

Of course, I don't want a spec series with styling cues. Try to keep the regulations as open as possible without the costs exploding.
August is offline  
Quote