|
the thing is, this is a *discussion* forum. what are we meant to discuss about a list that generally proves to be inaccurate?
like i've said on one of these threads, it's far more useful for yourself and everyone to have a context. take one team - who's tested for them recently? who's been talking to who? etc etc. that's called discussing stuff.
which is sadly a bit of a lost art on today's internet. as you can see by what happens when their opinion is challenged...
|