View Single Post
Old 17 Jul 2014, 12:25 (Ref:3434870)   #11
wnut
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke_toaster View Post
You're not the only person thinking hydrogen is a dead end. Battery/flywheel electric has the advantage of being flexible where the energy comes from. The challenge there is battery storage - the range extender being a useful thing (supposedly a use for Wankels?).
I think that Newey proved quite convincingly that ballast was more efficient than KERS and batteries.

Rosberg then proved that you can drag a dead KERS unit around for half a GP and still finish second, so they would not seem to be much use in the economy stakes either.

"Simplificate and add lightnes" worked for Chapman and would probably be hugely more efficient than KERS.

P.S. Wankels give huge power but they are very inefficient, turbine perhaps?
wnut is offline  
Quote