Thread: Rules Future Rule Changes
View Single Post
Old 13 Apr 2020, 12:27 (Ref:3970567)   #3817
Pingguest
Veteran
 
Pingguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Netherlands
Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,195
Pingguest should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greem View Post
I want that too, but overall I want racing.

If that means a team design a stupendously fast, light car with a tiny tank that can only do 10 laps before refueling, with another team designing a slightly slower car that can do the entire race distance on a single fill and doesn't need to stop for new boots, with them both coming together right at the end - why not?

That's the biggest change in recent decades for me. Random* drivers picking off the entire field in order to win because they've made an inspired design and strategy choice is one of the things that's missing.

But, I fear, this is just ending up as another one of those "what is F1" questions again...

*Excluding the current top cars which can do it to order.
There is nothing wrong discussing what Formula One is or should be. I wish Formula One's stakeholders had done it more often and, above all, more fundamentally.

And yes, it would be great to see drivers and cars having different paces relatively during the year, during different stages of the races and even through different sections of the track, but then again, without pit stops. Let drivers think about their strategy.
Pingguest is offline  
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari
Quote