Thread: Rules Future Rule Changes
View Single Post
Old 28 May 2020, 11:32 (Ref:3978901)   #3840
crmalcolm
Subscriber
Veteran
 
crmalcolm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Nepal
Exactly where I need to be.
Posts: 12,351
crmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by S griffin View Post
Yeah, it would have been better to reduce downforce. At least that would have made a difference
You've regularly advocated for reduced downforce. Can I ask why?

Do you also mean a reduced complexity at the same time?
Why do you think reduced downforce will make a difference?

From my perspective, I think it is the complexity rather than quantity that needs to be removed.
crmalcolm is offline  
Quote