View Single Post
Old 24 Aug 2009, 14:47 (Ref:2527323)   #16
Pingguest
Veteran
 
Pingguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Netherlands
Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,192
Pingguest should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marbot View Post
We seem to be under the impression that if it wasn't for F1,automotive technology would be 20 years behind what it is now.That simply isn't the case;never has been really.

Honda and BMW will probably take just as big a stride with their future technologies (if not bigger having looked at what Honda are up to) than any manufacturer in F1.
I never had the impression that Formula 1 played a key role in the development of future technologies. Due to its shape and demands, Formula 1's road relevance is very limited. But there's a potential for road relevancy: with proper regulations Formula 1 could well have a relatively small but positive effect on the development of fuel efficient and sustainable technologies.

Quote:
We should also realise that in 2010 there will be four manufacturers and nine private teams.Will these private teams (or indeed FOTA) be at all interested in fuel consumption,horsepower gains or tyre development if it means that every year a new set of regulations has to be drawn up in order to keep the cars speeds in check?
With a 'fuel formula' it wouldn't be necessary at all to draw up a new set of regulations in case cars become too fast.

When the 3-litre V10's became too powerful, new regulations had to be drawn up and completely new engines were introduced. With a fuel formula however, completely new engine designs are far from necessary to keep the power output in control. If the fuel allowance would be further restricted, the older engines only need to be detuned.
Pingguest is online now  
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari
Quote