|
If Toyota has a rotating wing at CotA then I guess that will tell us all something.
My problem is the words in the rule book says no movable aerodynamic devices. Toyota clearly has a movable aerodynamic device. What's the point of the rule book if you have evidence of something and you don't act.
If the FIA decided to fall back on scrutineering test to determine legality. Then throw the rule book away, publish tests and tell competitor that's the standard.
I like innovation, but please tell your competitors how you're going to interpret the rule book so they all have the chance to innovate as well.
|