Thread: IMSA DPi Discussion
View Single Post
Old 28 Mar 2016, 19:16 (Ref:3628135)   #264
wdave0
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
United States
NY
Posts: 797
wdave0 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridwdave0 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Ep View Post
http://www.dailysportscar.com/2016/0...gines-drs.html

Reading between all the lines it almost sounds like DPi would be the most sensible option to replace P1 privateer/light if IMSA is willing to open up the chassis constructor limit. That way privateers and manufacturers can compete at LM, WEC and IMSA if they choose to. And not bother the P1 hybrids for the overall wins at both LM and WEC and don't compete directly with the P2s as well.
Earlier today - this thread

So IMSA is trying to come up with a class we and the competitors will like while skating on the edge of ACO rules. ACO is now unhappy with the impurity of the IMSA interpretation. Neither body can really afford to back down. We discuss LMP1-L as a remote possibility and then comes news of an FIA rework of LMP1-l allowing manufacturer engines - just like DPi. Could it be that they are trying to defuse the situation by making DPi a natural fit for LMP1-L? No more issues for ECU, pro lineup, bodywork and now factory engines.
wdave0 is offline  
Quote