Quote:
Originally Posted by alexkiller8
the same old story... porsche fany boy see this way: "porsche is the best, no matter what"; porsche haters see this way: "porsche? pff". An objective point of view as i think to be is in the middle, porsche deserved the victory but can't be denied that porsche isn't the best car and luck helped them a lot.
|
Porsche has a lot of haters, and they think to be objective in their point of view. The only think I can do is smile about this, because they think to be objective, thinking their point of view is right, and all the others are wrong. But they are just some other fanboys.
The best answer on this point has been given by Spyderman.
Any other word is too much.
In endurance, the best car is not necessary the fastest one. The perfect endurance car must be fast, reliable, regular, easy to repair, comfortable, not thirsty for fuel...
If a slower car is capable to win twice (or more) times against fastes ones, well... I think fastest cars are not so good under some other points of view (i.e. reliability).
In endurance, is not the pure performance to make a winning car.
But that's only an obvious consideration.