Quote:
Originally Posted by Teretonga
I might go back and do the old 9,6,4,3,2,1 and then the CART 20, 16,14,12,10,8,6,5,4,3,2,1.
Just to see how it turns out on my two preferred systems.....
It will infact make little if any real difference. None of them do because they are all based on the same set assumptions
|
I've done both
9-6-4-3-2-1
S Vettel 79
F Alonso 76
L Hamilton 73
M Webber 72
J Button 59
F Massa 34
N Rosberg 28
R Kubica 26
M Schumacher 11
R Barrichello 6
A Sutil 5
V Petrov 3
K Kobayashi 1
N Hulkenberg 1
V Liuzzi 1
Red Bull 151
McLaren 132
Ferrari 110
Mercedes 39
Renault 29
Williams 7
Force India 6
Sauber 1
CART
S Vettel 224
F Alonso 222
M Webber 217
L Hamilton 214
J Button 199
F Massa 144
N Rosberg 142
R Kubica 138
M Schumacher 87
R Barrichello 62
A Sutil 59
K Kobayashi 43
V Petrov 35
V Liuzzi 32
N Hulkenberg 31
J Alguersuari 24
S Buemi 22
P de la Rosa 12
N Heidfeld 11
H Kovalainen 1
Red Bull 441
McLaren 413
Ferrari 366
Mercedes 229
Renault 173
Williams 93
Force India 91
Sauber 66
Toro Rosso 46
Lotus 1
I've done the CART system for quite a few seasons now and I do like it as a system. Given that I now no longer consider a championship representative of anything, I'm swaying back towards favouring a system of consistency rather than one with a greater emphasis on wins, though the current system is fine
The CART system is particularly interesting because it offers the same number of points in total as the current F1 system (101), but there are less points for a win - 1st-2nd is the same ratio as the previous F1 system, but the rest of the positions are effectively worth more than under that system. So it's good for consistency but doesn't totally devalue a win. And gives points to the top 12 which is better than 8 or 10