View Single Post
Old 11 Jan 2018, 01:46 (Ref:3791880)   #325
V8 Fireworks
Veteran
 
V8 Fireworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,938
V8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Umai Naa View Post
And the same reasons for that thread's length, are the same as now; no one can afford to run one, let alone buy one.
Lots of people, however, can afford to run GT4s.

GT4s are:
  • Relatively cheap
  • Production based
  • Relatively slow
  • Wide variety of manufacturers

The Nissan 370Z GT4, Ford Mustang GT4 and Chevrolet Camaro GT4 are already homologated and would be a simple turn-key solution for the respective teams (or they could choose from the wide range of other homologated marques).





Would they be a suitable regulation for the Supercars/ATCC? Would it be a faux pas for "Supercars"/ATCC to be significantly slower and less spectacular than GT3 cars?

Technically these are GT cars not touring cars, and they have the wrong number of doors. Should a "sedan" subclass of GT4 be created for slow and affordable GT4-style production-based four-doors such as the BMW M3, Mercedes C43 AMG and Alfa Romeo Giulia QV to compete in the Supercars championship?
V8 Fireworks is offline  
Quote