Thread: IMSA DPi Discussion
View Single Post
Old 10 Aug 2016, 02:42 (Ref:3664800)   #944
HORNDAWG
Veteran
 
HORNDAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Oregon
Posts: 8,919
HORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by TF110 View Post
By your logic, so was p2. They kept that class though didn't they.
No, they are/were not the same, period!
P-1 at the end of 2013 had 1 U.S. car left, Dyson. Pickett sold his company to Nestle who could care less about sports car racing. Dyson the one remaining, refused to race against/with DPs. The 2014 P class had 4 full time U.S. P-2 type chassis in the class, not the same. The goal going forward, as proven by the advent of the 2017 P class, was to get to a CF chassis as the single type of chassis for prototypes in IMSA's top class. LOGIC! Hence the birth of DPi.






L.P.
HORNDAWG is offline  
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent
Quote