View Single Post
Old 2 Feb 2014, 23:57 (Ref:3363438)   #127
TF110
Veteran
 
TF110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
United States
Posts: 15,409
TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyNameIsNigel View Post
It is reasonable to expect that the combined ERS-K + ERS-H to be used by Audi and Porsche will also be able to recover energy in excess of 8MJ per lap at LM and that they are likely to use an MGU at the front with a power of the order of 225 kW (300 HP), equating to less than 36sec of hybrid boost.

If Toyota do opt for an energy release via the two MGUs at the front and at the back, the TS040 is going to be massively quicker than the competition exiting corners. That will be interesting to watch and I wonder how the drivers (and tires) will cope with double the power output when the ERS kicks in.

Assuming however that Toyota opt for a more "conservative" energy release strategy using only one MGU (e.g. at the front), I would expect that we will not see major differences between the trio of manufacturers as far as ERS usage is concerned.

In any event, engine/fuel efficiency is going to play a major role and it remains to be seen if Toyota are confident that they can achieve the expected efficiency targets. Not so long ago, we heard them complaining about this issue.
We heard them complaining of the difference in targets. The ACO's target efficiency for diesel is 'easily achieved' compared to that of petrol. Thats the voice of Kinosh ta's concern. But we also read that they achieved 40% efficiency with the TS030. Im sure they're over the COMPLAINTS now.
TF110 is offline  
Quote