Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry S
It is very disappointing to see apologists for these people
They ended up producing something that people didn't want to buy
As for a "production glitch", oh spare me
From a quick look in my cupboard it seems the deceptive conduct started with the November 2012 issue. That's FOURTEEN (14) issues to December 2013
Is that ENOUGH evidence?
Don't understand the comment about state racing windups?
As for statement I should be happy to have 69% non ad content...
7% was speedway and drags, 6% was bikes, 4% was cover and index etc etc
This is not what the content should have been.
Would you be happy with articles on surfing or gardening to make up the 69%
|
Sounds like you've got a hell of an axe to grind.
Btw, I said: 'Unless there's evidence of it happening regularly' it might be a production glitch.'
But further to your point - so a national Motorsport magazine should not be covering bikes, speedway or drags? And it shouldn't have a cover - or an index?
It was a general motorsport magazine that covered most areas - so what should it have run for those 13% that speedway and bikes were occupying?