Thread: Does F1 need a "championship"?
View Single Post
Old 30 Jul 2010, 19:04 (Ref:2735987)   #46
bjohnsonsmith
Race Official
20KPINAL
 
bjohnsonsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
United States
London, England
Posts: 23,230
bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Quote:
Originally Posted by strider View Post
When I first saw the question, my immediate answer was that, yes, we do, but I've been thinking about it and now it's maybe not.

If you compare it to tennis, there is a ranking system and the #1 player at any one time gets major recognition.

Now in motorsport we have the Castrol Rankings, which serve a similar purpose, except that they are open to all motorsport competitors, not just those in F1.

Have a look here if you want to see how they stand at present.
I've been intrigued by the Castrol Rankings. How are points allocated?
bjohnsonsmith is offline  
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying."
Colin Chapman.
Quote