Quote:
Originally posted by DNQ
Yeah, I didn't watch a lot of F1 there, I was basing that on raw stats. I know that Mika should have won before Jerez.
|
Then why did you bother to post something that is so blatantly untrue?!! Whats the point?
Having ACTUALLY watched the 97 season Mika was by far the quicker of the two - in qualies and also in the races. He was leading more races and would have won more races than DC. SAdly he bore the brunt of the Mercedes unreliablity more than DC.
If a fully motivated Hakkinen had been driving this year then Rubens may not have finished second, however MS would still have won because he is the most complete F1 machine ever in the fastest and most reliable F1 car ever.
If Hakkinen had a car equal to MS then maybe the result would be different. On sheer pace over one lap I rate Mika ahead of Michael (similar to Juan Pablo) but over a season Michael is supreme and unbeatable by humans.
