Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam43
The only thing wrong with skypad is the name. If it didn't have a name no one would worry about it. It is just a way to show replays and highlight interesting aspects they want to draw our attention too. Every sports programme does it. It has a small advantage of having a user interface to allow flexibility in the commentary. It is like sitting in the editing suite that Brundle did on the red button last year.
|
They can do that from the paddock with a portable TV. With the pundit doing the voiceover, the viewer wouldn't know the difference from his POV. I like technology but it has to add something tangibe, IMO, not just be glitter.
Not that it's a big deal really but the presenters do need to develop that chemistry for the Skypad to be natural.