Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96
Let's see, disregarding tweets shows you're clueless or intentionally pigheaded about modern communication. Sorry that doesn't fit your idea of journalism but professionals do release information that way.
|
Which professionals are they? POTUS?
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96
And no, it's not an anti-texas stance. It's a stop ignoring the fact that millions were lost because the cars and ESP the tires were not suited to the track. A FACT that has been known since last year, Firestone could not retest to gather more data and the cars could not be driven as they should.
|
I am not sure who is ignoring that? What I heard was fix the aero, test the tires more and race next June.
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96
Management decided, because they like that a$$hat of a promoter at TMS, that he race shall go on. No, no it shouldn't.
|
So the race should have been cancelled?
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96
Texas has always been a crap race
|
Was 2016 a crap race?
For example -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gv8KNya9aeA
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96
the first year drivers had medical problems and vision problems for weeks after the race.
|
Wasn't this in 2001? Different cars and different formula's? Not sure of the relevance to what we saw a couple of weeks ago?
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96
There were probably more people at the Taco Bell in Indy that night then at Texas but they go back. It has never had the attendance of PIR so why waste the effort.
|
So to clarify you are saying that PIR has better attendance than Texas?
Texas has had some of the strongest crowds in Indycar outside of the 500 for many many years. A lot lot more than PIR