|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
2 Sep 2017, 17:05 (Ref:3763837) | #376 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,067
|
Quote:
The spectator numbers might low for a WEC race, but if all it's going to do is piggyback on an IMSA race, then you doom the series to low numbers should that agreement not be in place. I think Sebring is the right track for WEC, but I don't think it should be riding the coattails of IMSA when it's there, because it'll always be the unwelcome cousin. It is possible to make new classics (see Petit Le Mans), but it won't be done by just saying "hey we're here too! Please stay awake...please?" |
||
|
2 Sep 2017, 17:27 (Ref:3763844) | #377 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
I disagree, I think the (semi)canned attendance is the best scenario for the WEC and the fans. The time frame fits into premium viewing slots across the pond and those at the track hard core enough to hang, for what would be a '24hr event', will do so. While some trackside will catch a good sleep/power nap and wake up to more Sports Car racing. I am having a hard time with the breadth of animus about this, it does seem a rather win-win for almost everyone.
L.P. |
||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
2 Sep 2017, 17:42 (Ref:3763848) | #378 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,067
|
Quote:
The Sebring issue isn't the main problem for this calendar anyway. Cutting off the popular events is the big one. The calendar clashes with IMSA is pretty unforgivable too. WEC managed to clash on every available opportunity throughout the IMSA Calendar. That's abysmal. So yeah, Sebring isn't ideal, but it's the least of the issues with this mess. |
||
|
2 Sep 2017, 19:01 (Ref:3763866) | #379 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,067
|
http://www.dailysportscar.com/2017/0...uncements.html
Great article on DSC. DSC has highlighted something, which they point out is a good thing but also shows quite a negative side. There were changes made, albeit minor, between the 2pm meeting yesterday with team principals, and the 3:30 media briefing, notably the as yet unannounced/ undecided race dated for February 2019 was changed from january after the intervention of Porsche who pointed out that Daytona’s position on the global calendar should not be encroached upon. Yes, they are open to changing things. However they missed the glaringly obvious issue of conflicting with Daytona. And the rest of the calendar conflicts with IMSA too. It's great they are willing to change things, but they seem completely unable to see past their own series and plan things thinking they are the be-all and end-all of sportscar racing. It's a relatively small community of teams and drivers that fill these series, so blindly going at your calendar and creating issues is foolish. WEC needs to be less arrogant with the approach to things and start looking at the industry as a bigger picture. This is just one small example of it. |
|
|
2 Sep 2017, 20:12 (Ref:3763889) | #380 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 906
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Hey, occasionally they are indeed debates. Occasionally. |
|||||
__________________
. . . but I'm not a traditionalist so maybe my opinion doesn't count! -TF110 |
2 Sep 2017, 20:14 (Ref:3763891) | #381 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,591
|
Quote:
Quote:
The WEC has clashes with IMSA every season, and for 2018-9 they have had to make extra efforts not to clash with either F1 or Formula E. |
|||
|
2 Sep 2017, 20:19 (Ref:3763892) | #382 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,067
|
Quote:
Quote:
When you have teams pointing out that Daytona is a big deal, and the ACO basically saying "sorry, we didn't notice, we'll move that" it doesn't look good. One clash, fine. Two clashes...ok. But every opportunity? Well that's just poor. |
|||
|
2 Sep 2017, 21:09 (Ref:3763902) | #383 | ||||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 338
|
Quote:
Quote:
It's not about who races there. It's about the event - just like the LM24. |
||||
|
2 Sep 2017, 21:39 (Ref:3763907) | #384 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,559
|
The manufacturers were approached about GTE qualifying races and the dropping of the idea doesn't look negative when you read the quotes, it doesn't sound like it's a big loss. It'll give them exposure, but it costs more money and potentially an entry into the race if they crash. Plus it's not even been completely ruled out.
On the clashes, it's a tough thing to manage. This is an FIA series so they have to try and make it so they don't clash with F1 and FE. IMSA put the Detroit race on their date but it's usually been custom to have the LM test day 2 weeks before the big race. How is that the wec's fault? Last edited by TF110; 2 Sep 2017 at 21:44. |
|
|
3 Sep 2017, 00:29 (Ref:3763938) | #385 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,493
|
Quote:
Belle Isle is up for renewal after next year — whether the race continues at all depends upon whether it can get a new environmental permit from the state of Michigan. |
|||
__________________
“Sometimes there’s no poison like a dream.” — Tanya Donelly |
3 Sep 2017, 02:15 (Ref:3763957) | #386 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,473
|
WEC should have gone for a mix of the old ILMC + separate world championship races in places where there's no blue riband sportscar event. Dropping Silverstone and Nurburgring + cloning the Sebring 12H is certainly not the way to win (back) fans.
|
|
|
3 Sep 2017, 03:04 (Ref:3763968) | #387 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 926
|
Did some thinking about this today. If the ACO were trying to create a new event race in the US I think you have to start with thinking about where car people are going to be doing car people things.
Anyone who has bothered to listen to me talk about sports cars over the years knows that Laguna Seca is my favorite circuit in the US. Isn't it every year in late August that is Monterey Car Week? Now it's obviously not going to happen now with the winter schedule they have proposed, but in hindsight wouldn't it have made sense to have piggy backed off an event like this? You could have created a new event that was already an event in itself. At the same time you'd also be creating your own racing event as part of it that was not associated with any other series. Again, just some thoughts in hindsight. |
||
|
3 Sep 2017, 03:56 (Ref:3763972) | #388 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
Fact is that the ACO needed to swallow their pride and run Grade 2 tracks in the US. COTA's not getting the job done, Indy doesn't seem to be popular, and Mexico City and Montreal aren't on the radar.
The Sebring deal is weird, but it's better than COTA and the midnight Saturday to noon Sunday will suit the European TV crowd. |
||
|
3 Sep 2017, 08:35 (Ref:3764000) | #389 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 366
|
So, I buy one of those nice Ginetta LMP1s for 2018.
I get a test day then I can race it twice. Then 3 months off, some on a boat to Japan. I get two more races, then the car is in China with another 3 months off during which WEC will transport it to TBC and on to Sebring. Then in May back in Europe, a clean down and ready to do it all again... Not sure I'd find this a compelling programme. Shame, because until now I've seen privateer LMP1 as the future. Not sure I see a future at all now. Mariantic |
||
|
3 Sep 2017, 10:31 (Ref:3764031) | #390 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,692
|
At least it seems they are trying to get a new formula in place to get it more sustainable, so hopefully that'll work come 2020
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
3 Sep 2017, 10:56 (Ref:3764036) | #391 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6,488
|
Quote:
There has to be a transition year, and with costs already a major issue going the cheaper and more sparse route is the better option. |
|||
__________________
BoP is democracy for racing. |
3 Sep 2017, 11:17 (Ref:3764041) | #392 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 305
|
Was out watching rallying yesterday so have only caught up with the news. Hmm...
Do the ACO know what they're doing? Dropping 2 of the bigger spectator events? Right, we all know the WEC is struggling, so costs have to be cut - that's fine, and so action has to be taken to keep the 'World' status; but this is the best they can come up with? I don't really understand the 'Winter' calendar, when it actually isn't a proper winter series. Just have 6 races; Spa, Le Mans, Nurburgring, Silverstone, plus a US round and Fuji....job done. Four races in the European heartland, plus an Asian race, and an a Americas race to give you 3 continents. Sebring makes no sense unless it's the proper/ official 12 Hours of Sebring; and that's not feasible. I've said before; the ACO may run Le Mans, but they can't run/ promote a World series - and they prove this time & again. |
|
|
3 Sep 2017, 11:26 (Ref:3764044) | #393 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
Quote:
I certainly don't see what is proposed being cheaper. In fact I can see serious cash flow problems for teams |
||
|
3 Sep 2017, 13:44 (Ref:3764068) | #394 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,638
|
The FIA/ACO had six years to create a stable championship. Six years to build a proper foundation and a sustainable structure that didn't need to rely on manufacturers. Every new championship needs stability and especially more so for a world championship. But that never happened. We all knew that if the manufacturers left, this championship would be in serious trouble because they have nothing else to fall back on. And it has actually happened. Privateer P1 may save this championship or it might be a classic case of too little too late.
Quote:
However, if all the privateer P1s fail to finish at Le Mans 2018 and no real improvement is shown by Sebring 2019, it's better to just go with a P2 for Le Mans 2019, especially if Toyota don't return. At that point, the ACO is in a hole. Keep P1 and hope it gets better/hope the manufacturers return or just scrap it and rely on P2? It's a messy situation. |
|||
|
3 Sep 2017, 15:21 (Ref:3764086) | #395 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
As much as ACO tries to promote privateer LMP1 teams to get a shot of winning Le Mans, we all know that they want some manufacturer money when competing in the top class!
Seriously, I feel that GTE-Pro is the playground for prestigious marques for now, and I have no faith on those privateers winning the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Why not ACO just include the likes of DPi and GT500 classes instead of sticking to their own rules. |
|
|
3 Sep 2017, 15:50 (Ref:3764089) | #396 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
MV, LMP1 was THEIR IDEA, and DPI and GT500 aren't.
Salamus, I really don't see how you have a commercially-viable World Championship without those name-brand manufacturers. And I'm just going to head something else off before it's mentioned. There are already too many GT-only series out there, so how would a GTE WEC stand out enough, especially when 2/3rds of the calendar is on modern, Grade 1 circuits? (I could be generous and say only 50%, since Spa is still MUCH better than any of the new builds or remodels of old circuits.) Yes, there still is LMP2, but those cars have other options, and without P1, the works teams are in GT. If it comes to that, just take over the Intercontinental GT Challenge and add Le Mans to their schedule. Last edited by Purist; 3 Sep 2017 at 16:00. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
3 Sep 2017, 16:13 (Ref:3764095) | #397 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,638
|
Quote:
What makes DPi and GT3 appealing and safe is that you have a good mix of both manufacturer-supported teams and small independent teams. I'm not suggesting the WEC go to DPi, but the FIA/ACO can certainly learn from IMSA and SRO. |
|||
|
3 Sep 2017, 16:19 (Ref:3764096) | #398 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
||
|
3 Sep 2017, 16:23 (Ref:3764101) | #399 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,067
|
But I'm a fan. I don't want DPi as the top class at Le Mans (but would like an IMSA invitational class), because I don't want the overall winner to be determined by whoever plays the BoP Game the best - see N24 and almost Spa 24 2016.
|
|
|
3 Sep 2017, 16:36 (Ref:3764108) | #400 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
You mean whoever pays to have their machines win races, right? Well, I want DPi to be included minus the manufacturers meddling into manipulating the BoP in their favor.
Heck, a success ballast would be nice for that class if implemented correctly. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2018 VASC Silly Season (with POLL) | GTRMagic | Australasian Touring Cars. | 2074 | 19 Oct 2018 05:49 |
[Driver] 2018 F1 silly season. | F1Guy | Formula One | 1204 | 16 Sep 2018 23:44 |
WEC round 8: Six Hours of Bahrain---WEC season finale. | chernaudi | ACO Regulated Series | 212 | 23 Nov 2015 22:17 |
Hockenheim secures new deal until 2018 | jab | Formula One | 13 | 2 Oct 2009 00:25 |