|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
12 Jun 2015, 16:24 (Ref:3548077) | #4201 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,847
|
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
12 Jun 2015, 17:04 (Ref:3548093) | #4202 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,847
|
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
12 Jun 2015, 17:12 (Ref:3548095) | #4203 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 76
|
This is the kind of sports-related p!ss-taking that hopefully everyone can agree is pretty funny.
|
|
|
12 Jun 2015, 17:41 (Ref:3548105) | #4204 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,847
|
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
12 Jun 2015, 18:01 (Ref:3548109) | #4205 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6,171
|
It's a refreshing break from the last 30+ pages and I think everyone who has read even half a page of it has earned the right to laugh at those jokes.
Nevermind aiming for the factory cars, Rebellion, ByKolles, etc. - Nissan should be looking to match the number of laps the circular arguments have done in this thread. That would put at least one car on track come sunrise! |
||
__________________
BoP is democracy for racing. |
12 Jun 2015, 19:30 (Ref:3548137) | #4206 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
I watched their onboards for a good bit. They have no issue driving past gte's. Its their braking thats the problem. They seriously start to coast maybe 150m before the other lmp1's!
I was watching when Mardenborough's fast lap (3:37) and he would coast way before the blue 200m marker from the first chicane. His trap speed on that lap was 323.9kmh. Thats a real bright spot for this car. If they can get their braking together (the hybrid would surely help) they'd improve significantly. I cant see how they even do over 310 braking that early. Relying solely on the engine for acceleration, I guess they need to coast like theyre going downhill to save fuel. If they had the hybrid running, I bet they could get close to 350kmh. |
|
|
12 Jun 2015, 19:39 (Ref:3548140) | #4207 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,497
|
||
|
12 Jun 2015, 19:48 (Ref:3548141) | #4208 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 76
|
Feels good to read something encouraging; thank you! Just read a nice interview with Darren Cox and his hackles certainly seemed to be up regarding those who claimed the program may be in disarray or not taking things seriously. Amidst all of the smiles and hyper-optimism from the team (which has been great), it was also nice to read some tough words from a man defending his "child". Not going to post it though; I don't want anything to come off as provocative, and I figure the people that want to feel good about the program will go and find it.
|
|
|
12 Jun 2015, 20:23 (Ref:3548159) | #4209 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,131
|
Astonishing to me to dislike a racing effort based on the hubris of the team's PR efforts.
|
||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
12 Jun 2015, 20:30 (Ref:3548163) | #4210 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,847
|
Agreed.
Astonishing to get worked up about people saying a racing team isn't doing very well too. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
12 Jun 2015, 20:40 (Ref:3548169) | #4211 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,334
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
12 Jun 2015, 21:32 (Ref:3548190) | #4212 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,203
|
Quote:
more bullsh*t alert http://www.crash.net/le-mans/news/21...struggles.html Quote:
"but we haven't hidden our problems" What problems? Reading Cox's interviews is like listening to "Everything is Awesome". When you say you're the most open team every 5 minutes it doesn't make you actually open and fan friendly, it makes you a liar. |
||||
|
12 Jun 2015, 21:37 (Ref:3548191) | #4213 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
They might be saving fuel, but they might also be saving brakes. When they redid the braking because they knew they weren't going to have the 8MJ car they originally thought they would have, maybe they redid it for 4MJ, or even 2MJ, but now they have 0MJ and the brakes have to do all the work. Maybe cooling issues? Even if they upgraded the cooling enough for the brakes to do all the work, that means now they have more drag than the original concept of the car had. Lots of disconnects between the car as realized and as originally intended. Hopefully in the next few months they can close those disconnects. |
|||
__________________
Just give them some safety rules, limit the fuel (to control the speeds), drop the green flag, and see what happens. |
12 Jun 2015, 21:48 (Ref:3548193) | #4214 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,847
|
Nissan LMP1 Discussion
The point the post you quoted is trying to make is why eat so much bullsh*t, bathe in it, expose yourself to it, live it, get hung up on it, when you can simply just watch the racing, engineering and development. Surely that is more interesting to a sportscar fan than what Daz says? I'd like to talk about the merits (or as I see it lack of at the moment) of the concept. However that's not really on. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
12 Jun 2015, 21:48 (Ref:3548194) | #4215 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,470
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Is sure as hell doesn't mean you get to know everything. So. Instead of being a useless troll. Bring something to the conversation. |
|||||
__________________
“We’re trying to close the doors without embarrassing ourselves, the France family and embarrassing (the) Grand American Series,” he said in the deposition. “There is no money. There is no purse. There’s nothing.” |
12 Jun 2015, 21:50 (Ref:3548195) | #4216 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,847
|
Nissan LMP1 Discussion
And that last post is just as bad.
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
12 Jun 2015, 22:20 (Ref:3548199) | #4217 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,970
|
Quote:
My problem is we don't seem to be allowed to criticise a car which is further behind the leaders than the AMR-One and the Lavaggi LS1 without being told to support innovation, or in some cases be told to shut up. Whilst I support nissans attempt at bringing Motorsport to more homes (blancpain steams for example) and attempting to make it more accessible, I don't see why they should be immune to criticism where others were not. |
||
|
12 Jun 2015, 22:27 (Ref:3548202) | #4218 | |
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 299
|
I have really enjoyed this thread. I really cannot keep away from it and would like to make a contribution.
I have been designing and building racing cars for fun for over thirty years (fifteen different designs) and the knowledge gained in that time tells me there is no way this car is anything but a disaster. It was the same with the Deltawing. Hype against science. How can anyone say that the Nissan project has positives when they find themselves with a car that is so far off the pace and deficient in so many areas? BB is trying to be different and fair play to him, he has got everyone talking about his last few projects, but until the laws of physics change he is not going to taste success. The poor boy is way out of his depth as he was at the now defunct Lola cars. I have said it before and I will say it again, the whole Nissan project is like the "Emperors new clothes" you either see them or you do not. The smart ones on here see through the hype. |
|
|
12 Jun 2015, 22:36 (Ref:3548208) | #4219 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,131
|
Quote:
This project is interesting. It isn't working. The teams is having to create a puzzle that is lacking pieces. They are there. They got pretty far to even get there. |
|||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
12 Jun 2015, 22:36 (Ref:3548209) | #4220 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
How EXACTLY is the idea of a front-engine AWD hybrid a disaster? Quote:
|
||||
|
12 Jun 2015, 22:43 (Ref:3548211) | #4221 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,822
|
This thread has been closed until after Le Man's. Then the ***** fest can continue. I would like to enjoy the race and don't want to have to keep reading this. If you continue the same conversation in other threads don't be surprised to get an infraction.
|
||
|
14 Jun 2015, 21:13 (Ref:3550482) | #4222 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,847
|
Good close. A shame, but good close.
After seeing it in action there is lots to talk about, but it is clear that it is impossible due to a few people. Crikey it's like primary school. Friendly sportscar fans? Must be a lie. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
15 Jun 2015, 01:34 (Ref:3550566) | #4223 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,822
|
Ok, it has now raced. We can make inferences and discussion on what we saw on track. I thought the team did better than I expected. I thought it would be a stretch to see them make the 6 hour mark, but damned if they weren't there at Sunrise. Of course the pace was lacking, but I think we all expected that. Their spirit of fixing the cars and sending them back out was pretty great to see from them. I hope they learned a lot and will be better prepared for next season. I don't know how much more development there will be during this season, but I hope they show up for the remaining rounds.
One piece I caught in a driver interview on RLM was that the driver (can't remember which one) said they are already working on the 2016 gearbox. I thought it was odd that they singled out the gearbox but it made me wonder if this was the part that was the trouble in mating the hybrid. |
||
|
15 Jun 2015, 01:55 (Ref:3550573) | #4224 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Did about as well as I expected. They were able to run within two seconds of their qualifying times, but reliability left something to be desired. Though that's pretty common, to be honest - it's a first year program, you shouldn't expect it to be reliable out of the box.
Something else I realized while watching the race, though, is that Nissan has actually built a competitive LMP2 car. Or rather, what WOULD be a competitive LMP2 if it had been reliable. The engine is within P2 rules, close to P2 power output, and it posted lap times that were in the upper P2 range. If front engine/front drive is P2 legal and the car was meant to run P2, this would've been a great success(despite lack of victory). |
||
|
15 Jun 2015, 02:52 (Ref:3550581) | #4225 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 717
|
From what I saw it made me excited for the cars future potential. I have to admit, seeing the Porsche and Audi carving the Nissan up through the higher speed curves was striking in the speed differential, but just served as a reminder as to how much more development the Nissan needs.
It will be exciting to see the further growth of this car, and whether Nissan change anything significant, or are committed to deliver the original design. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] Porsche Prototype Discussion | Simmi | North American Racing | 9261 | 15 May 2024 15:22 |
[WEC] Toyota LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | ACO Regulated Series | 6771 | 18 Aug 2020 09:37 |
Audi LMP1 Discussion | gwyllion | ACO Regulated Series | 11685 | 16 Feb 2017 10:42 |
"We were pleased with Nissan Motorsport's performance in 2013,"- Nissan | GTRMagic | Australasian Touring Cars. | 8 | 16 Dec 2013 09:20 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |