|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
11 Mar 2000, 22:04 (Ref:7035) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,370
|
While I was doing research on the Ford GT40, I came across this information. NASCAR driver Dick Hutcherson co-drove with Ronnie Bucknam, a Holman and Moody prepared Ford GT40 Mk II to a third place finish in the 1966 Le Mans 24 Hours--the first time he had seen this track. Not bad for a midwest dirt track stock car driver who mainly turned left, huh? I also know that this race ended in the rain.
Dick Hutcherson would have surely ranked higher amongst the NASCAR greats if he wouldn't have retired so early (after three seasons). With all the hoopla about Tony Stewart winning three races in his rookie year, how about what Dick Hutcherson did. Finished 2nd in the final point standings and won nine races his rookie season. However, he didn't win the rookie of the year award that season because he was deemed inegible for the award because NASCAR had a rule that if you had won a championship in another pro series, you were ineligible for rookie of the year. Hutcherson had won two championships in 1963 and 1964 in the International Motor Contest Association (IMCA) late model series. At any rate, I wanted to post this information so that others could learn about an all-time great who shouldn't be forgotten. Perhaps if had he not retired after the 1967 season, he could have been known as one of the greatest in all of motorsport. To check out more, go to: www.nascar.com/news/2000/0218/998289.html [This message has been edited by Joe Fan (edited 12 March 2000).] |
||
|
12 Mar 2000, 01:03 (Ref:7036) | #2 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 283
|
Dick who???
Thanks for the news Joe. It was something new for me. Pretty impressive rookie. Love the LeMans part especially. Make those uppity Euro's think twice about the special skills it takes to make a right turn. |
|
|
12 Mar 2000, 22:32 (Ref:7037) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 752
|
A classic reason why I get so iritated with the NASCAR officials. They change the rules so often it's pathetic, and it seems like they do this in a show of favoritism almost every time as well.
That is really lame! And people always ask "Is NASCAR rigged?" When they do stuff like that the answer is obvious... |
||
|
13 Mar 2000, 01:13 (Ref:7038) | #4 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 283
|
I wouldn't quite call it rigged. The rules always change in every racing series ever devised.
|
|
|
14 Mar 2000, 20:51 (Ref:7039) | #5 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,038
|
At least when NASCAR "rigs" a series, it's to guarantee close competition rather than to assure a particular outcome.
Joe, I was always a fan of the Ford GT40 and Ken Miles. Let us know what you learn in your research. [This message has been edited by Neil C (edited 14 March 2000).] |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dick Barker | Ted Walker | Motorsport History | 10 | 29 Nov 2018 10:43 |
So how can Dick run 5? | GTRMagic | Australasian Touring Cars. | 19 | 1 Mar 2006 02:07 |