Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Classic Cars Monthly Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Historic Racing & Motorsport History > Historic Racing Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 Aug 2001, 05:46 (Ref:127425)   #1
Ray Bell
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Various parts of Australia
Posts: 2,221
Ray Bell should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Building them new...

Historic racing, this one...

In Australia it is permitted to build 'Historic' race cars provided they are built with automotive components of the correct vintage and they are built 'in the manner of' cars of that period.

This is one bit of evidence that this is a good idea... a Buick engine with 4 carburettors nestling in a Chrysler chassis, Bob Larkin being the owner. Doesn't it look great?



Of course, a lot of these cars finish up looking a lot better than the real cars of the era, but at least there is something out there representative of the cars that raced in the pre-war days. The freedom ends with 1940, by the way.
Ray Bell is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Aug 2001, 06:36 (Ref:127437)   #2
TimD
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
TimD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
United Kingdom
Derbyshire Peak District, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,797
TimD should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTimD should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTimD should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I'm in two minds about this.

(Great creation by the way, though.)

The VSCC in Britain scrutinised fresh specials very carefully, because of the risk of viable restoration project cars being used as donors for hybrids of no discernible racing pedigree.

Alvises and Rileys are the most vulnerable to this process. The market value of an Alvis Silver Eagle fabric saloon is far outweighed by its restoration costs, but a special can be fabricated on the chassis for a fraction of the price, and will quite possibly be quicker than a genuine vintage sports car which is trying to compete against it.

Where it falls down is in the case of a friend of mine who found himself with a terminally rotten and engineless Lagonda 2.6 of about 1955. The chassis was a prime candidate for a monoposto special, and so he had fun making one, and then motorised it by dropping in the Jaguar XK140 engine he had in his yard for a decade or so.

Trouble is, his car is ineligible for just about any race series there is. Fortunately the "run what you brung" spirit of the Bentley Drivers Club race meeting means that the car gets an airing very occasionally, but otherwise it is a lovely engineering exercise with very little usability.

It's tricky, this one.
TimD is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Aug 2001, 08:21 (Ref:127456)   #3
Ray Bell
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Various parts of Australia
Posts: 2,221
Ray Bell should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
In practice, Tim, we've seen more of this sort of thing in cars that aren't able to be 'made in the likeness of.'

Cars of the fifties aren't allowed to be built up, but a number of genuine specials are running either in a form they got rebuilt into a bit later in their racing history, or they were modified at a time when Historic Racing was new here and have been allowed to get away with it.

One of these is Lou Molina's Vulgarilla, an MG Special that was in fact the Platypus MG in the fifties with an Austin Healey engine and monoposto body. It was Lou's concern for the genitalia over top of the driveshaft that had it changed, apparently!

The photographed car sports a grille modified from an International truck, inverted, by the way, and has a Chrysler gearbox.

This is more typical of the creations that come of the allowance to build these cars. An old British Chassis is a good start, but a lot come on American chassis, with an American engine generally, because they are large and loud, and a body of some kind or other.

This is more or less like this car was, and so typical of many...



This was built in the immediate post war years with a Ballot touring chassis from the twenties, along with its running gear, and an Oldsmobile engine and gearbox from the mid thirties. The body style was meant to emulate Peter Whitehead's ERA, which it did nicely.

One car recently finished has a 5.7 litre aero engine from the twenties in a Buick chassis of the same era, while one of the really quick ones is considered to be having a bit of a lend of the rules for Group J (pre-1931), an Amilcar chassis with an AC six that goes very well, thank you.

I would like to see it happen for cars through to the mid fifties or so, but some say this would just lead to an abundance of Jag-engined things, of which we have a couple of real ones anyway.

Yes, I can see how it might be a drain on some of the PVT cars in your land, but here there is too many rubbishy old things about that can be more readily obtained that it's not such an issue.
Ray Bell is offline  
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
building your car . . . . . .HOW MUCH ! zefarelly Racing Technology 9 24 Mar 2004 17:00
Seat building a (new) GT car. E46 Sportscar & GT Racing 21 12 Apr 2003 10:02
Building new cars? pink69 Touring Car Racing 15 27 Jun 2001 18:10
Building 10-10ths Wrex Announcements and Feedback 27 27 Jun 2001 17:32


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.