|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
27 May 2008, 22:16 (Ref:2213518) | #26 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
28 May 2008, 00:18 (Ref:2213567) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
Penske and Ganassi and AGR are spending as much as they always have. Do you know Ganassi leases a whole highway tunnel from an abandoned stretch of Pennsylvania Turnpike and turned it into a high tech wind tunnel? Penske took over a whole friggen old Panasonic factory as his new facililty. Etc. You can legislate it to death but as long as the budget is there, then they'll spend it. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
28 May 2008, 04:41 (Ref:2213621) | #28 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,203
|
I don't really think Indycars can afford to go down a spec route for fear of being lost in the plethora of spec racing. And I do think that to say you want to go down a spec route is lazy, not in the sense of doing nothing, leaving work early but in the way of we could have something better but it could be too hard to make it work.
Plus they will have to work out something that works for themselves...CART is dead, IRL is dead, Champ Car is dead - all failed because they couldn't get agreement or they were trying to hold on to somthing that once worked but didn't anymore. Indycar must live on as something that is designed for them and their fans, no matter how hard it may be |
|
__________________
Careful. We don't want to learn from this - Bill Watterson I'd hate to read what the people who hate the sport have to say... |
28 May 2008, 10:35 (Ref:2213808) | #29 | ||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
INDY this year was soldout, despite being the first spec one ever. Quote:
Therefore, before becoming ean expensive series like Cart were in the 90's, a radical turnaround in the general situation is required. In the medium term there are no evidences of it yet. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
28 May 2008, 14:22 (Ref:2213949) | #30 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
To continue to be a spec series would be dangerous indeed.
It could be offset by making the cars fast though, although the safety brigade will put a halt to that and we'll be stuck with yet more painfully slow cars and snail-like average lap speeds. |
|
|
28 May 2008, 16:30 (Ref:2214019) | #31 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
Don't these cars have Hanford devices? Or is that just better for speedway racing only?
What about adding restrictor plates? Basically add something so that drafting can happen. More dangerous and you run the risk of multi-car collisions, but at least there's passing and opportunities for the cars in the back of the field to move up. |
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
29 May 2008, 10:10 (Ref:2214523) | #32 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
Restrictor plates with open-wheelers? Thats a deathwish. They way you get overtaking with Indycars on ovals through the balance of downforce and power. Mario Andretti was tlking about this receently. The old style Indycars (and later Champ Cars) had more power than downforce, this meant that you would go down the straights at ~240mph, but have to back off to ~190mph in the corners. This meant there was a significant degree of skill to driving on ovals and the need to get out of the throttle meant there was opportunity to overtake. The current Indycars have more downforce than power so all they do is go around the track flat out at 220mph and noone can overtake. |
|||
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna |
30 May 2008, 09:25 (Ref:2215179) | #33 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
31 May 2008, 05:13 (Ref:2215711) | #34 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 683
|
Bobby Rahal's vision of the IndyCar of 2011
5-29-08 http://www.gordonkirby.com/categorie..._is_no130.html |
|
__________________
Please bring road and rally racing to the VERSUS tv channel! |
31 May 2008, 05:44 (Ref:2215716) | #35 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
31 May 2008, 06:09 (Ref:2215719) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
I dislike entirely the idea of making it a totally spec series. I can live sameness as a natural by-product of one option being far better than the others, but mandated spec for a "premier" series irritates me. It is not the kind of thing that stops me watching, but it does decrease my interest.
I would much prefer there to be more power than downforce, with the largest part of this achieved via a significant power increase. Again, for me, anything claiming to be "premier" series needs to have serious power (the IRL at present, IMO, falls rather short of this). Food-based fuel is a terrible thing with potentially catastrophic consequences for humanity. The effects of this approach are beginning to felt, and, in the interests of the overall good of man, further development of this madness should be opposed and resisted at all costs. I guess what I mean is, for me, there needs to be more to it than simply what happens on-track each race. |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
3 Jun 2008, 06:27 (Ref:2218338) | #37 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
I still repeat, a spec series is the dullest but cheapest solution.
when there's a lot of money for everybody, let's bring on a multi-engine, multi-chassis series; for now, let's be realistic |
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
3 Jun 2008, 20:05 (Ref:2219061) | #38 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,354
|
They do not have to mandate a chassis bit issue a series of rules and allow manufacturers to tender their designs (homologate) them. They can still allow more than one design but you can bet that the cars will be:
a. more expensive b. the teams will go for the most experienced manufacturer c. after 6 months or a year most teams will be running the fastest design, the rest will be also rans and will eventually and rapidly disappear. That is simply because of the economics of modern racing. Don't forget that the teams can modify parts and produce little variations for their Dallaras now. A Penske Dallara is a little different from the Ganassi one and an AGR one has other differences again. |
|
|
4 Jun 2008, 06:23 (Ref:2219337) | #39 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
good points all Tere
|
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
23 Jun 2008, 01:00 (Ref:2235305) | #40 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 683
|
Robin Miller: BMW, Ford, and GM to meet with IndyCar Series soon
(from the Speed Report on Speed TV - June 22, 2008) Robin said that Honda, BMW, Ford, and GM (might have missed one from the tv report) will meet with officials about the 2011 engine regs and what not on Tuesday June 24, 2008. Fans on spec cars: http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/artic...r-june-18//P3/ |
|
__________________
Please bring road and rally racing to the VERSUS tv channel! |
23 Jun 2008, 13:46 (Ref:2235716) | #41 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
Adam Ashmore's concept of the 2011 Indycar
http://www.gordonkirby.com/categorie..._is_no134.html
I like the looks of that concept , the smooth lines mark it out as different from other single seaters. His ideas include a spec chassis until the series is commercially strong enough, which makes sense, and a 1.5l V6 twin-turbo engine. |
||
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna |
23 Jun 2008, 16:43 (Ref:2235860) | #42 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
It should be pointed out that Mazda does not badge, and that it's been stated elsewhere that Robin Miller's reporting that Ford is at the table is erronous - that it's Mazda instead.
That leads me to believe that motors will not be spec. |
||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
24 Jun 2008, 00:24 (Ref:2236232) | #43 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 683
|
Quote:
Indy to Hold Engine Manufacturers’ Summit By Robin Miller 6-23-2008 Representatives from Audi, BMW, Mazda, General Motors and Honda are expected to attend along with Ilmor and Cosworth. http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/artic...turers-summit/ http://www.ilmor.co.uk/ Could the "Cosworth XH LMP1 V8" be used in 2011? Race Tech Magazine says the total weight is 160 kg. http://www.cosworth.com/content.php?...5&contentid=73 |
||
__________________
Please bring road and rally racing to the VERSUS tv channel! |
25 Jun 2008, 14:47 (Ref:2237292) | #44 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
The Indy Star had a brief item this morning that stated that seven auto manufacturers plus six other engine building companies met with IRL officials yesterday to discuss possible engine configurations for 2011.
I think they should use ACO/ALMS LMP2 engine guidelines and tweak the tuning to get them at about 700 hp. That formula works and manufacturers are already involved in it. |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
27 Jun 2008, 06:59 (Ref:2238522) | #45 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
http://sports.yahoo.com/irl/news;_yl...v=ap&type=lgns
Here's a Yahoo! article. Apparently, turbos are not off the table, and the possibility of 3 to 5 engine manufactuers (anything over 3 is too many, IMHO). |
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
27 Jun 2008, 19:54 (Ref:2238959) | #46 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
Heard the manufacturers meeting went well at Indy and they're in a "tell me more" position.
If they didn't go for 2011, there wouldn't be enough time to do it right and the CC teams that came over would be buying new stuff in 3 out of 4 years and falling economically by the wayside. The idea of the cars and tires being "spec" and that being just an awful thing is a lot of malarkey. Ask 3/4ths of the people in the stands what "spec cars" even means and they're much more interested if Dixon is leading and Danica is second and their guy is third. NASCAR's "common template" is "spec" but no big hue and cry with it there. "Spec" is a term used in a derogatory manner by some high brows in the road racing community and, IMO, will continue to be used in a condescending fashion to oval-track fans along with everything else they can throw at the series. |
|
|
28 Jun 2008, 06:27 (Ref:2239115) | #47 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
Spec. racing belongs in SCCA amateur circles where it is fine for good old boys out for a weekend get together. Fan are not as damn stupid as you say they are, at least not he ones who keep racing going when all the bar-fly types flit on to some other aisnine deal-of-day entertainment slough. Read more of the NASCAR sites and yo will see people are sick of the COT and the same old, same old pile of crap all year. Without Toyota to cause some interest by simply being annoyingly there, it would be a snooze fest. Drag racing is as far from spec. as any series is today and is growing by leaps and bounds. The car related companies that used to pump millions into open wheel oval racing now spend it there. The variety of products on the banners by the pits, are the same ones many spectators have in there own cars; NOT the SAME CRAP, SAME PILE no matter where you look. Chevy, Ford, Dodge all have heavy duty parts books filled with engines used by these racers and fans. If open wheel racing does not give a damn about the millions of fans that attend drag races every week fine, but Detroit pumps out parts and takes in millions every year to keep them happy. NOW tell how wonderful this spec. feces is. |
|||
|
28 Jun 2008, 06:39 (Ref:2239122) | #48 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
I agree with Bob. Racing should not be so controlled so as to take away the participants' ability to come up with the best car possible themselves. NASCAR, for example, has lost it's luster with the COT. In a way, I believe that part of the demise of Champ Car was the single spec cars.
When I saw CART race in Fontana in 2002, I saw how competive it was to see Ford, Honda, Toyota, Reynard, and Lola race one another. During the race there were times when one combination was better than the others. As a result the race was unpredictable because I didn't know who would win. It was that great because no one team was really dominant. Then in 2004 my sister and I went to Las Vegas. What a snooze fest. You already knew from the beginning that Bourdais was going to win because he was in the lead from beginning to end and generally the race order didn't change. Pit strategy didn't help. This was when there were only Ford Cosworth engines and Lola chassis. A spec series race that was a snoozefest. In theory spec series should be good racing because suppossedly everyone is equal and therefore should have no advantage. In practice, spec racing is not exciting to watch. |
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
28 Jun 2008, 10:06 (Ref:2239201) | #49 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
In NASCAR, you used to have "stock" cars from the various manufacturers. Now, it's just engines, and yes, the COT takes one element away from it, but when they're racing, it's still Jeff Gordon and Chevy vs. Tony Stewart and Toyota, etc.
There have been many times throughout the history of this sport that a car or engine has become so dominant that everybody wanted it and sometimes got it. Like the Offy. The Cosworth of the late '70s and early '80s. Dan Gurney's Eagles of the early '70s. And that's WITH more open rules. The sport, with almost 100 years of history, goes through its cycles. I think those who believe the IRL oughta go off willy-nilly without stabilizing the sport first are going to be disappointed. |
|
|
28 Jun 2008, 11:38 (Ref:2239230) | #50 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
Been lurking around this thread for a bit - not sure I have anything really worthwhile to add, but here goes:
I am still in the "walk before you run" mode. Funny how horrible spec racing is to some and yet the spec racing often results from a natural selection process. As has been noted, teams that want to go fast right now will rush lemming-like to whatever chassis they perceive as "the fastest." You could have 40 different chassis' out there, but in no time every team that matters will be in one. Heck, even Penske gave up building their own chassis and this is a group that built a reasonably competitive F1 car. Not like they didn't have the know-how to do it. Now Bob Reibe (and Bob, I love your posts because you never mince words!) makes a point about the excitement of the old days. I liked it too and I think Mario Andretti is on to something. Whatever chassis is used, the engine HAS to make more power than downforce. This is where I think Tim's point about ALMS could be huge IF the powers-that-be are able to work out some sensible rules that will (hopefully) keep one manufacturer from dominating. I really like the idea of allowing engine size/type determine things like weight/downforce on the car. The variety should be there to allow teams to use say a small, high-revving turbo in a lighter chassis with more aero against a big honkin' V-8 in a heavier chassis with less aero (or the other way around on the aero). You get the idea. I am with mountainstar on the corn ethanol thing too. There are enough starving people in the world without using corn (food) to feed a Flex-Fuel Escalade that gets at best 14 mpg going downhill with a tailwind. |
||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Max's Grand New Plan. Spec Chassis and Bio Turbo Engines. | Hazza | Formula One | 118 | 28 Jun 2007 19:21 |
BTCC Spec/ETCC Spec Cars at Media Day | Cosworth_RS | Touring Car Racing | 2 | 17 Mar 2004 22:06 |
Another arguement for spec. tires | neilap | Formula One | 5 | 22 Jun 2003 14:29 |
Should Spec Tires Marble? | paul-collins | Sportscar & GT Racing | 3 | 15 May 2003 13:48 |