Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > My Track Designs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 Apr 2010, 19:20 (Ref:2671038)   #1
tlongman
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
United States
New Jersey
Posts: 369
tlongman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Barber Motorsports Park Challenge

As some of you may know, Grand Am and Indycar are holding races at Barber Motorsports Park this weekend. IMO this is one of the best tracks in the US due to its constant undulations and beautiful scenery. It does have 1 major problem however: It is nearly impossible to pass. Apart from Indianapolis, this is the only road course in America that the FIA has deemed suitable for F1. In its current state however, the track is too small and too hard to pass on for F1 to consider racing there. Your challenge: Expand the track and create at least 1 more passing zone so it could host the American round of the Formula 1 World Championship.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ba...ports_Park.svg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgJwUfI5oGs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcoSLv29ows
tlongman is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Apr 2010, 19:29 (Ref:2671046)   #2
duke_toaster
Veteran
 
duke_toaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
European Union
Englandland
Posts: 5,100
duke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridduke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlongman View Post
Apart from Indianapolis, this is the only road course in America that the FIA has deemed suitable for F1.
It was given a Grade 1T licence so that USF1 could test there, not Grade 1 (which is needed for races). In most cases it would not be difficult to get a 1T circuit up to 1, but Barber Motorsports Park is too short - the IndyCar pole time was around 1:10, F1 cars would be able to go comfortably under a minute.
duke_toaster is offline  
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier."
Quote
Old 11 Apr 2010, 20:38 (Ref:2671078)   #3
tlongman
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
United States
New Jersey
Posts: 369
tlongman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Oh ok I didn't know there was a difference. But that's my challenge. Expand it so the track is suitable for F1.
tlongman is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Apr 2010, 20:48 (Ref:2671083)   #4
Purist
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
United States
Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 5,892
Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!
Duke, you might like to know that actually Appendix o of the FIA regulations only demands a 3.5km lap for an F1 Grand Prix circuit. Therefore, technically, the lap at Barber IS long enough. However, I would agree that it would help to reconfigure things to make overtaking more possible.
Purist is offline  
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain.
Quote
Old 11 Apr 2010, 21:01 (Ref:2671093)   #5
duke_toaster
Veteran
 
duke_toaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
European Union
Englandland
Posts: 5,100
duke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridduke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Yes, the minimum is 3.5km, but they would not be likely to grant a licence to it though as it is so twisty. It's not that wide, either.
duke_toaster is offline  
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier."
Quote
Old 11 Apr 2010, 21:03 (Ref:2671096)   #6
dyewat808
Veteran
 
dyewat808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
United Kingdom
Posts: 692
dyewat808 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I admit I like this circuit,I don't know what it is about it, good flow or something. I prefer it to other circuits like Watkins Glen, for some reason - I just can't put my finger on it...

I'll have a crack at this at some point.
dyewat808 is offline  
__________________
Please, call me dye.
Quote
Old 11 Apr 2010, 21:16 (Ref:2671108)   #7
Purist
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
United States
Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 5,892
Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!
The start/finish straight might need a little widening, but the rest is just fine on width. Minimum width for Grade 2 or 1 circuits is 12m (40ft); Barber is 45ft wide. Also, despite its twisty nature, Barber would be faster than Singapore, Valencia, Hungaroring, or the 2010 layout at Bahrain.

Dye, I like Barber more than I used to, but Watkins Glen is still definitely a better road course in my estimation.
Purist is offline  
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain.
Quote
Old 11 Apr 2010, 22:15 (Ref:2671137)   #8
marcel82
Veteran
 
marcel82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
European Union
Beersel, Belgium
Posts: 1,005
marcel82 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
it'd be hard to expand this track without losing a great corner; they all have a unique character that makes them quite challenging for a driver, except maybe the hairpin and the final turn.
marcel82 is offline  
__________________
Heaven is a checkered flag.
Quote
Old 12 Apr 2010, 13:56 (Ref:2671424)   #9
dyewat808
Veteran
 
dyewat808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
United Kingdom
Posts: 692
dyewat808 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcel82 View Post
it'd be hard to expand this track without losing a great corner; they all have a unique character that makes them quite challenging for a driver, except maybe the hairpin and the final turn.
I think that is what makes it for me. Purist, I still rate Watkins Glen very highly in racing terms, but in track design - Barber, I think its because of what marcel said, each corner has its own different feel to it.
dyewat808 is offline  
__________________
Please, call me dye.
Quote
Old 12 Apr 2010, 14:13 (Ref:2671439)   #10
Quintin03
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Netherlands
Posts: 569
Quintin03 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'm not doing this, it's too good as it is. I can't make it any better. I'm not doing anything to a track that's fine as it is.
Quintin03 is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Apr 2010, 14:38 (Ref:2671448)   #11
NaBUru38
Veteran
 
NaBUru38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Uruguay
Las Canteras, Uruguay
Posts: 10,397
NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!
It's impossible to make room for F1-grade runoff areas, so I'll instead modify the track to make it suitable for IndyCar. Only two corners are visibly needed to be changed, the hairpin-chicane and the second left-right esses, and I have two proposals for each. Then, the first corner and the good hairpin must be widened two or three meters. Finally, a (dismountable) kerb must be added to the inside of the first corner, so cars have to brake more and drivers can outbrake their rivals.
Attached Thumbnails
barber_nbu1.png   barber_nbu2.png  
NaBUru38 is offline  
__________________
Nitropteron - Fly fast or get crushed!
by NaBUrean Prodooktionz
naburu38.itch.io
Quote
Old 15 Apr 2010, 03:15 (Ref:2672934)   #12
Birddog07
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
United States
Pittsburgh
Posts: 449
Birddog07 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I like NaBUru38's drawing, with a turn 7 of the second one, and turn 11/12 of th second.

The chicane at 9/10 should be taken out and the cars have a long sweeping flatout backstraight IMO. Course seems alittle short at 2.3 miles, but more laps so I guess that's good.

To lengthen it, I'd say add a fast extension sort of like Road Atlanta. Go straight at turn 13 going up the hill, going over the paddock road, possibly alittle scenic woods drive, hairpin and chicane right before pit entry and rejoining the track for turn 15.

I think those would make the current track better, aswell as adding an extension that is good to watch the cars full throttle, and probalbly 2 good passing zones.

I also think that this track is suitable for F1 competition, obviously it needs garages, bigger grandstands, and probalbly a wider (and longer, bring turn 15 back alittle possibly, could create another passing zone aswell) front straight. If the FIA thought the track part was 'unsafe' I don't think it would have recieved 1T.

Anyways, don't think these changes will be made. Maybe a few turns tweeked and a road added at 9/10 to take it straight, but that's all I realistically think would get done. Shame because I would love a USGP here.

Last edited by Birddog07; 15 Apr 2010 at 03:36.
Birddog07 is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Apr 2010, 18:14 (Ref:2673273)   #13
NaBUru38
Veteran
 
NaBUru38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Uruguay
Las Canteras, Uruguay
Posts: 10,397
NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!NaBUru38 is going for a new world record!
Cutting the esses would hardly create an overtaking spot with such a fast corner, plus its runoff area is too tight now. A better solution would be a less tight chicane than mine, which would help drivers overtake more safely (compare Monza's and Interlagos' first chicanes). But that would need a larger revamp.

Drivers were talking about a chicane at turn 9/10, so that can happen for next year.
NaBUru38 is offline  
__________________
Nitropteron - Fly fast or get crushed!
by NaBUrean Prodooktionz
naburu38.itch.io
Quote
Old 15 Apr 2010, 19:33 (Ref:2673312)   #14
Purist
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
United States
Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 5,892
Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!
A chicane there won't help. The run from Turn 8 to 9/10 is too short for that to really work.
Purist is offline  
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain.
Quote
Old 15 Apr 2010, 23:10 (Ref:2673393)   #15
Birddog07
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
United States
Pittsburgh
Posts: 449
Birddog07 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaBUru38 View Post
Cutting the esses would hardly create an overtaking spot with such a fast corner, plus its runoff area is too tight now. A better solution would be a less tight chicane than mine, which would help drivers overtake more safely (compare Monza's and Interlagos' first chicanes). But that would need a larger revamp.

Drivers were talking about a chicane at turn 9/10, so that can happen for next year.
Well a tight hairpin at the esses should slow cars down and allow an overtaking spot.

Also, I'd like to add on my extension idea, the loop should go up, hairpin, then fast esses on the way down like Road America then slow chicane before rejoining the track at pit enterance.
Birddog07 is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Apr 2010, 23:34 (Ref:2673402)   #16
Purist
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
United States
Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 5,892
Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!
Birddog, I think we're going to need a visual of what you have in mind.
Purist is offline  
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain.
Quote
Old 16 Apr 2010, 03:07 (Ref:2673432)   #17
Birddog07
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
United States
Pittsburgh
Posts: 449
Birddog07 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'll get to that.
Birddog07 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Apr 2010, 06:29 (Ref:2673458)   #18
Birddog07
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
United States
Pittsburgh
Posts: 449
Birddog07 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Can't edit anymore?



Something like that. It could go an wrap around the paddock aswell, that loop is just something general. Could be better to have a kink like 130R rather than sweeping. And all the way to that hairpin is pretty much uphill.
Birddog07 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Apr 2010, 17:38 (Ref:2673792)   #19
Mike_Wooshy
Veteran
 
Mike_Wooshy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
England
Birmingham
Posts: 1,677
Mike_Wooshy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridMike_Wooshy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
my 2 cents
Mike_Wooshy is offline  
__________________
The race track and the human body, both born of the earth, drive to be one with the earth, and through the earth one with the car,
drive to the undiminished dream, single moments of pleasure, an eternity of memories.
Quote
Old 16 Apr 2010, 19:00 (Ref:2673836)   #20
dyewat808
Veteran
 
dyewat808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
United Kingdom
Posts: 692
dyewat808 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ok, here's my quick attempt.

My thinking behind it:
1-lengthen the pits
2-keep the doubling-back nature of the track in the extension.

[Maybe it hasn't quite retained the original's nature ]

Done in Sketchup, then imported into Google Earth. Track width's the same, pit length is about 500 m, track length around 5.5 km.
Attached Thumbnails
barber_proper.jpg  
dyewat808 is offline  
__________________
Please, call me dye.
Quote
Old 16 Apr 2010, 19:01 (Ref:2673838)   #21
nickyf1
Veteran
 
nickyf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Scotland
City of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Posts: 4,767
nickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridnickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I have concentrated on different areas to most other people here.

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=3645710

I like the track the way it is already, it looks nice, so I decided to keep all of the corners, but extend the track out in places, if you know what I mean. Apart from the last section obviously as you can see.
nickyf1 is offline  
__________________
'My lovely horse, running through the fields! Where are you going, with your fetlocks blowing in the wind?'
Quote
Old 16 Apr 2010, 19:12 (Ref:2673842)   #22
dyewat808
Veteran
 
dyewat808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
United Kingdom
Posts: 692
dyewat808 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I liked that nickyf1. So much so that I used the "extend in bits" idea in another one of mine:

LINK

3.19 miles. Like my previous one, has a longer straight for pits. I tried to design it so that run-off wouldn't be too short, unlike the current design, yet keep as much of the character of the current track as possible.

I like this one more than my previous one, I think.
dyewat808 is offline  
__________________
Please, call me dye.
Quote
Old 16 Apr 2010, 19:26 (Ref:2673849)   #23
Flaming_Wuzzle
Racer
 
Flaming_Wuzzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United States
a house
Posts: 448
Flaming_Wuzzle should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Total length should be around 3.3 mi. I've kept all of the existing track except for what I've had to leave out for the extension.

The new track splits off from T13 and goes downhill through T16. Track heads back uphill through the T17/18 esses until T19, with a sharp drop like the Corkscrew. Bottoms out in T21 (the turn that leads onto the straight) and goes up slightly to T22, then back over the hill and down to the existing course, rejoining in the middle of T14a.
Attached Thumbnails
BarberEdit.jpg  
Flaming_Wuzzle is offline  
__________________
Eagles may soar, but BRMs don't get sucked into jet engines.
Quote
Old 16 Apr 2010, 20:27 (Ref:2673869)   #24
nickyf1
Veteran
 
nickyf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Scotland
City of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Posts: 4,767
nickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridnickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
And now I take it too far
http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=3645945
nickyf1 is offline  
__________________
'My lovely horse, running through the fields! Where are you going, with your fetlocks blowing in the wind?'
Quote
Old 16 Apr 2010, 21:43 (Ref:2673908)   #25
tlongman
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
United States
New Jersey
Posts: 369
tlongman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaming_Wuzzle View Post
Total length should be around 3.3 mi. I've kept all of the existing track except for what I've had to leave out for the extension.

The new track splits off from T13 and goes downhill through T16. Track heads back uphill through the T17/18 esses until T19, with a sharp drop like the Corkscrew. Bottoms out in T21 (the turn that leads onto the straight) and goes up slightly to T22, then back over the hill and down to the existing course, rejoining in the middle of T14a.
Now THAT is what I'm looking for! Fantastic job! Nice presentation and description too. It still might be a bit too hard to pass but I like how it maintains the organic feel of the track and doesn't eliminate too much of the existing track. (which I frankly find to be brilliant but it's just too short) You've gained my approval!
tlongman is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IndyCar Test at Barber Motorsports Park DanicaFan Indycar Series 37 7 Mar 2010 12:07
Barber Motorsports Park Now Official DanicaFan Indycar Series 8 28 Jul 2009 20:38
IRL will test at Barber Motorsports Park luke IRL Indycar Series 3 5 Oct 2007 06:22
Barber Motorsports Park KC Bike Racing 3 24 Sep 2003 08:12


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.