|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Apr 2019, 17:07 (Ref:3896624) | #6501 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,932
|
Quote:
F1 brings almost nothing to the table. FE is at least different. Not particularly great, but entertaining at times. |
||
|
10 Apr 2019, 17:15 (Ref:3896628) | #6502 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 299
|
I view FE as glorified karting races with some pretty decent talent. Then it's pretty fun
|
|
|
10 Apr 2019, 17:19 (Ref:3896629) | #6503 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,932
|
I personally like it because it's different. I don't take it seriously, but the tracks can be fun and different. I prefer watching FE over F1 at Barcelona or Shanghai, put it that way. It's just different.
|
|
|
10 Apr 2019, 17:31 (Ref:3896631) | #6504 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
Well, it seems you just don't care much for F1. that's why. But let me tell you this - they still have unique car designs, and I would never enjoy a spec series over it. Also they have some pretty solid plans for the future, namely a pretty balanced combination between aero and ground effects. I just really hope the WEC doesn't become a BoP-ed spec series, or at least not LM. I also wouldn't be able to enjoy all-electric prototypes. I think it would really be the end of racing for me when you combine all those. |
||
|
10 Apr 2019, 18:46 (Ref:3896650) | #6505 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
I'm kinda copying and pasting this from another forum I post on because, thinking about it, my discussion with someone else on the matter does bring up maybe a valid point.
"If that's the case (having production hyper cars in LMP1), why even call the cars prototypes? I just think that the ACO are desperate for factory team money in the top class, and they're not being very caring how they get it as long as they get it. IMO, that kind of amorality may kill the class before it even gets off the ground. And if LMP1s are due to get slowed to 3:30 around Le Mans, then LMP2 as a knock on will probably be slowed to 3:45 around LM. 3:45 is already borderline GTE speeds. So I have to ask this? If the ACO want modified production based hypercars in LMP1, why not just take GTE pro, give them carbon brakes, 700-800hp, and more aggressive aero?" One, is that what the ACO wants? Two, is that what the ACO may end up with? And three, is that what the teams and us fans want? I know that us fans often don't like change, but it's guaranteed in life, just like death and taxes. We still don't have to agree with it, however. I do feel like from my POV maybe quoting some lyrics from the song "Take a Hint" that was featured on an episode of Victorious back in the day. I know that quoting song lyrics from a song featured on an old-ish, kinda girly, family friendly teen sitcom is probably nightmare fuel for some on here, but, so too it seems, are these LMP1 proposals. |
||
__________________
Power to me is having the ability to make a change in a positive way. Don't dream it, be it. |
10 Apr 2019, 20:09 (Ref:3896666) | #6506 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
Even that would feel a lot more organic. If it comes to that, I say have the two GTE classes (PRO and AM) and have the manufacturers from the suped up GTE class fight the privateers from LMP2 for the win. Might as well. |
||
|
10 Apr 2019, 20:45 (Ref:3896678) | #6507 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 299
|
The current privateer cars will have to be massively slowed down too. I wonder how they will do that.
|
|
|
10 Apr 2019, 21:30 (Ref:3896688) | #6508 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 363
|
I think horsepower reductions would be the easiest way. I wonder how much the GTEs can get sped up. Can they make a new GT1 class out of them? Give them really good tires too.
|
|
|
10 Apr 2019, 23:36 (Ref:3896702) | #6509 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,125
|
Realistically, how many GTE cars are availabe? I am talking about privateer svailabe? Maybe things would change if that class moved up the marquee, but as it is only Porsche and Ferrari are available (I believe), and Ford is going away. As things are, there is not a lot to base things on, is there?
|
||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
11 Apr 2019, 00:46 (Ref:3896708) | #6510 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
My thinking was to have a separate, third class based on GTE cars where they would be a lot faster, and manufacturers can come in and compete for the overall win using cars based on their road cars, sort of like LMGT1. They get to spend their money, but they are bound by the regulations in what they can have or not have on the car (but no spec parts) . It should still be a lot cheaper than LMP1-H. Competing against them would be private, independent teams who will have freer regulations and be able to develop prototypes similar to LMP2 in performance (which will still be regulated to ensure they don't become impossibly fast for the other, GTE-based class). This class won't be open to manufacturers with big money. Obviously something would have to be decided about the engine. I suppose this is very much influenced by an idea Mosley had a few years ago for controlling costs in F1 - choose a cost cap and operate within freer technical regulations, or spend all you want but work within stricter technical limits. I think this concept has no place in F1 as there are no separate classes there, but maybe it could work here if you balance everything right. Manufacturers won't have to spend those crazy budgets anymore, and will be able to focus on cars that will resemble their production cars. Privateers will have the chance to fight for the win because of the greater technical opportunities (which may actually necessitate some sort of R&D cap because this may work only if they do have smaller budgets). |
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 01:47 (Ref:3896712) | #6511 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,308
|
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 02:08 (Ref:3896715) | #6512 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,308
|
Oh I almost forgot about this. This is almost exactly the rule that killed GT1 the first time. Prior to the '97 season you had to properly sell at least one car beforehand. The CLK-GTR didn't even have a prototype road car for most of its racing career, a fact that angered BMW enough for them to leave FIA GT and switch to LMP. The full minimum production wasn't finished until after both the category and championship ceased to exist. I'm not sure if the CLK-LM and Bitter (the Lotus with the Viper V10) were ever actually legal in the end...
|
|
|
11 Apr 2019, 02:53 (Ref:3896718) | #6513 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
I think legalities were the least of the Bitters problems lol ‘‘twas a good idea putting a Viper motor in a Lotus Elise GT1 chassis. Well good in theory..
|
||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
11 Apr 2019, 08:39 (Ref:3896749) | #6514 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,359
|
The speculation in this thread is wild.
I just hope calm heads prevail and we don't end up with a rule set that caters to the very short term whims and wishes of a small group of manufacturers who will disappear as soon as their 'activation' (puke) activities are complete. And please don't shaft the privateers again. |
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 10:13 (Ref:3896787) | #6515 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 13:52 (Ref:3896823) | #6516 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
IMO, that's been the problem with the ACO for about the past decade, they've thought only of the short term. LMP900 lasted for 6 years, first gen LMP1 for 5 years. You don't get much stability IMO if you keep trying to change the rules every 3 years or so, which is how IMO this mess kinda started as well as the ACO just being overly ambitious.
|
||
__________________
Power to me is having the ability to make a change in a positive way. Don't dream it, be it. |
11 Apr 2019, 15:03 (Ref:3896828) | #6517 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 393
|
Dauer built about 13-15 cars, they just need 12 more and we could see a second victory for the Dauer 962..... That was a supercar.
Back to the future IV. Ok, it was silly, but someone could do it with a LMP2 chassis with the current new-new-new today's rules |
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 17:22 (Ref:3896843) | #6518 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,932
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 18:04 (Ref:3896853) | #6519 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,648
|
Ford is considering outfitting the GT GTE to fit in the hypercar regs
https://www.autosport.com/wec/news/1...-entry-with-gt |
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 18:34 (Ref:3896861) | #6520 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 18:34 (Ref:3896862) | #6521 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
Some interesting commets from Vasselon:
https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/n...otype-hypercar Quote:
|
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 18:38 (Ref:3896864) | #6522 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,932
|
One of the arguments for BoP is it keeps costs down. If you have high budgets and BoP, then you're removing one of the major advantages of having BoP.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2019, 18:39 (Ref:3896865) | #6523 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
“It is absolutely not what we are looking for, it's very sad that Le Mans, in the end, will be won on Balance of Performance but it looks like a condition at the moment to [attract] competitors.”
YES. YES. YES. I applaud him for being honest, I salute Toyota. Anyway 2021-2024 are already lost, but it's only six years until LM 2025 when all of this nonsensical garbage should (hopefully) be washed away... when you think about it that way, it's only long away as 2013 is. And before that we still have 2020 and 2021 to comfort us even a little bit Last edited by Deleted; 11 Apr 2019 at 18:46. |
|
|
11 Apr 2019, 19:22 (Ref:3896875) | #6524 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
But in the real world, I think will be the best (at least for the sake of LM's reputation) if the ACO would drop all the silly ideas and bite the bullet. Let it sting, but keep it real, instead of trying to hold on to what they used to have at all costs. They need to go through a catharsis. |
||
|
11 Apr 2019, 19:33 (Ref:3896878) | #6525 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
But I still think they are doing better now, as of the past few years at least. And I think they are on to something with the India concept they are planning to implement in 2021. I've been commenting (though not here, as I'm not very active in the F1 forums at this site) since 2013 that they absolutely should bring back ground effects. FE is whatever to me. Like you and others have said, it's OK to watch, but you shouldn't be taking it too seriously. Maybe it would be good entertainment if you catch a glimpse. But I believe both LM (and supporting series) and F1 are very serious, and shouldn't be just entertainment. It's where the best of the best come and race hard. It's where we see insane tech development. For some reason, while hybrid is fine, I don't think full electric would do it for me. Maybe because there is also this aspect of keeping a connection with the historical roots of the series. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] Glickenhaus Hypercar | Akrapovic | ACO Regulated Series | 1603 | 12 Apr 2024 21:24 |
[WEC] Aston Martin Hypercar Discussion | deggis | ACO Regulated Series | 175 | 23 Feb 2020 03:37 |
[WEC] SCG 007: Glickenhaus Le Mans LMP1 Hypercar | Bentley03 | ACO Regulated Series | 26 | 16 Nov 2018 02:35 |
ALMS Extends LMP Regulations | tblincoe | North American Racing | 33 | 26 Aug 2005 15:03 |
[LM24] Whats the future of LMP's at Le Mans?? | Garrett | 24 Heures du Mans | 59 | 8 Jul 2004 15:15 |