|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 May 2004, 19:54 (Ref:962840) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,421
|
Would Adelaide 1994 and Jerez 1997 have been as hyped if...
...they were not title deciders? I don't think so. Many people think MS drove into DH on purpose in Adelaide 1994, but less than a year later at Silverstone 1995, the same thing happens again (MS and DH both going for the same piece of black stuff, MS ahead of DH, DH trying to pass MS) and DH gets the blame. Why? The first one was a WDC decider, the second one was not.
Last edited by Yoong Montoya; 6 May 2004 at 19:56. |
|
|
6 May 2004, 20:16 (Ref:962854) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
I don't know about the majority of 1994 and the whole of the 1995 season as i didn't really bother to watch F1 that year because of the previous season.
But from what i have seen of footage of the incident in Adelaide, Damon gave him plenty of room and went with at least 75-80% of the car over the kerbs to avoid Michael. It's so obvious that he turned in on Damon, steering problem or no steering problem, you'd have to be blind not to see. Same goes for Jerez, but that one went off the scale for sheer stupidity and he (TGF) got what he deserved. Jacques got what he deserved that year as well. Last edited by ASCII Man; 6 May 2004 at 20:21. |
|
|
6 May 2004, 20:21 (Ref:962857) | #3 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
the question here would be.... would Jerez 97 and Adelaide 94 be as hyped if MS was NOT involved in those incidences.... i think probably not..
|
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
6 May 2004, 20:23 (Ref:962859) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
Doesn't matter who it is, if everythings on the line then it doesn't matter if its Michael Schumacher or Billy-Joe The Slack Jawed Jokel.
|
|
|
6 May 2004, 20:29 (Ref:962863) | #5 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
at Ascii Man
in answer to Yoong's original question... NO it would not have been as hyped because there have been a lot worse incidences of "cheating" than those two but since they involved a WDC there is always an added sort of hype.... again you could look at Senna/Prost 89 and 90... the biggest controversies in f1 but there have been a lot worse that havent got the hype or coverage.... |
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
6 May 2004, 20:31 (Ref:962865) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
YM, you like to live dangerously don't you
I can see how this thread will turn out already |
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
6 May 2004, 20:33 (Ref:962867) | #7 | ||
Weasel Wrangler
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,885
|
If they hadn't been in Championship deciders ... they wouldn't have happened.
|
||
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose." |
6 May 2004, 20:34 (Ref:962869) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
6 May 2004, 20:44 (Ref:962878) | #9 | ||
Weasel Wrangler
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,885
|
Who mentioned Silverstone ?!?!
|
||
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose." |
6 May 2004, 21:11 (Ref:962894) | #10 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
And the guilty party is ...... Quote:
|
||||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
6 May 2004, 21:31 (Ref:962907) | #11 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Quote:
It's those incidents that contribute towards the antipathy towards Schumacher. He wasn't really disliked before Adelaide. |
||
|
6 May 2004, 22:59 (Ref:962969) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 679
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"Drinking makes such fools of people, and people are such fools to begin with that it's compounding a felony." Robert Benchley |
7 May 2004, 05:30 (Ref:963096) | #13 | |
Registered User
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 92
|
yeah, but the thing about 1994 is that MS got dq'd that year for some serious BULL. So I adelaide does not really bother me...
Jerez 1997 is a different story. There MS was just plain wrong. |
|
|
7 May 2004, 06:32 (Ref:963112) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Although as a whole, Michael deserved the 1994 WDC, when you take into account the race bans etc. The way he actually won it was wrong!
|
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
7 May 2004, 06:38 (Ref:963115) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
IN particular, not only was Senna's move on Prost very unfair, I reckon it was premeditated, but also was really dangerous, cos' it could have caused a very hard accident to Prost. But, you know, it was Senna, and almost nobody noticed. Thus you're 100% right, the personality of who causes unfair accidents influences the general judgment on it. |
|||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
7 May 2004, 06:49 (Ref:963124) | #16 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
Jerez 97 was far more blatant you could read his thought process from the in-car footage It was this incident that told the world what he was willing to do to win. But more importantly it then caused people to re-assess the 94 incident and back dated everyones opinion 3 years But in answer to the original question No they wouldn't have attracted the same hype if they hadn't been title deciders because there would have been less at stake. |
|||
|
7 May 2004, 07:11 (Ref:963136) | #17 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
respst Damon . you can tell his not from Columbia
forgot to answer the question .. No Last edited by Dani Filth; 7 May 2004 at 07:13. |
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
7 May 2004, 08:01 (Ref:963172) | #18 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,147
|
Re: Would Adelaide 1994 and Jerez 1997 have been as hyped if...
Quote:
Adelaide 1994 was blantantly TGF's fault. He turned in on Hill. No argument. Silverstone 1995 was Hill's fault, as he came from at least 5m behind TGF to try a silly move. Damon Hill got the blame because it was his fault! And Jerez 1997 was TGF at his most stupid. Last edited by DriverT; 7 May 2004 at 08:02. |
|||
|
7 May 2004, 09:43 (Ref:963257) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,508
|
I don't think that Schumacher would've tried either move if it wasn't a decider, it was a case of his win at any cost philosophy.
|
||
|
7 May 2004, 10:43 (Ref:963310) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,370
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Holden- How One Legendary Driver Earned Nine Permanent circuits- the life blood of motorsport |
7 May 2004, 20:30 (Ref:963791) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
7 May 2004, 23:09 (Ref:963898) | #22 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 265
|
Maybe, but the '94 incident one could almost put off to immaturity.
I wish F1 would return to Jerez. I like that circuit. |
|
__________________
Life is not a spectator sport! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Driving behaviour after the court hearing of Jerez 1997 | Knowlesy | Formula One | 117 | 7 Jul 2004 20:19 |
Jerez, circa 1997 | macdaddy | Formula One | 19 | 4 Jul 2003 23:30 |
Who's the most overrated and over hyped driver? | Paul Raymond | National & International Single Seaters | 90 | 4 Jan 2003 19:43 |
Adelaide R1 - pretty boring - has Adelaide lost its magic?? | Michael H | Australasian Touring Cars. | 58 | 5 Apr 2002 23:47 |