Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 Aug 2000, 12:39 (Ref:27533)   #1
neutral
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location:
Australia
Posts: 390
neutral should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I was just wondering if there was enough room for two cars in the same team to come into the pits? Wouldnt they get in the way of opposing teams wanting to enter the pits and hence be awarded some sort of penalty? Secondly, after the race the commentator talked about some sort of agreement that would see the pole man come in first given some strange incident. Isnt this crazy? In my opinion race day should be independant of qualifying, and whoever is leading should have priority. Could you imagine if DC was behind by say 10 seconds and then given pit priority. Im no Mika fan(far from it!!....oh then again I hate DC as well) In my mind the most efficient method is to give the leader priority. Finally, I just realised what I love most about modern F1. It's not the rain, its not the controversy, but its the faces of the McLaren crew(especially Ron) after they blow certain 1,2 victories. HAHAHAH!!!

P.s could someone please confirm the regulations of the first question. I plea ignorance on this subject.
neutral is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Aug 2000, 13:36 (Ref:27543)   #2
Schume
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location:
Wycombe, UK
Posts: 144
Schume should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Had a look at the FIA Site for the Pit Lane rules.
This is all I could find. Looks like its's ok to bring in two cars. What does 66c mean???

Anyone else know anything about this???

"PIT LANE


66(a) For the avoidance of doubt and for description purposes, the pit lane shall be divided into two lanes. The lane closest to the pit wall is designated the "fast lane", and the lane closest to the garages is designated the "inner lane", and is the only area where any work can be carried out on a car.

b) Competitors must not paint lines on any part of the pit lane.

c) No equipment may be left in the fast lane. A car may enter or remain in the fast lane only with the driver sitting in the car behind the steering wheel in his normal position, even when the car is being pushed.

d) Team personnel are only allowed in the pit lane immediately before they are required to work on a car and must withdraw as soon as the work is complete.

e It is the responsibility of the Competitor to release his car after a pit stop only when it is safe to do so.

Schume is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Aug 2000, 15:53 (Ref:27570)   #3
Marshal
Veteran
 
Marshal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location:
Bristol
Posts: 1,275
Marshal should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridMarshal should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Presumably 66c means what it says. If you want to move a car in the fast lane of the pit lane you have to have a driver onboard. Perhaps the more interesting question is why?

Can anyone remeber an ocasion in antiquity when an unoccupied GP car caused havoc in the pits?
Marshal is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Aug 2000, 16:16 (Ref:27580)   #4
Schume
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location:
Wycombe, UK
Posts: 144
Schume should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
"A car may enter or remain in the fast lane only with the driver sitting in the car behind the steering wheel in his normal position"

66c seems to imply that you could park the car in the fast lane as long as the driver is still sitting in it???
Schume is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Aug 2000, 00:40 (Ref:27689)   #5
Liz
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location:
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,451
Liz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridLiz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Erm, excuse a silly question, but isn't that fast lane where the other guys are going to be driving to get back out onto the track? If DC is parked there with his engine idling, waiting his turn for the pits, isn't he likely to be rammed from behind by somebody on his way out?
Liz is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Aug 2000, 05:59 (Ref:27743)   #6
Valve Bounce
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Australia
Home :)
Posts: 7,491
Valve Bounce has been held in scrutiny for further testing
Common Sense should pervail

I had already posted a rather lengthy comment on this subject in the thread "Coulthard Publicly absolves McLaren from blame" in line with neutral. However, I must say that Martin was screaming out that DC should have followed Mika in and queued up behind him. In fact, I think both cars had been ordered in. At th erisk of repeating myself, it would have been stupid to have asked Mika to move over to let DC past before bringing both cars in. From memory, I think there is enough room for two cars to fit one behind the other in a pit, but I will check on this.
Valve Bounce is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Aug 2000, 07:56 (Ref:27754)   #7
JohnL
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
England
UK
Posts: 16
JohnL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Can't remember the details but I'm sure it was this season - a sudden downpour had teams coming in for wets and one team actually did bring both cars in at the same time, the second car waiting his turn in the "slow" lane until the first one left. This was not covered in great detail on TV but there appeared to be room without impeding the team in the next garage.
JohnL is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Aug 2000, 01:32 (Ref:27964)   #8
EERO
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
EERO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
United States
Massachusetts
Posts: 5,305
EERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by neutral
Im no Mika fan(far from it!!....oh then again I hate DC as well) I plea[d] ignorance on this subject.
This from someone called "neutral"
EERO is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Aug 2000, 09:42 (Ref:28017)   #9
Peter Mallett
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
 
Peter Mallett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
England
Here and there
Posts: 37,302
Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!Peter Mallett is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Quote:
Originally posted by JohnL
Can't remember the details but I'm sure it was this season - a sudden downpour had teams coming in for wets and one team actually did bring both cars in at the same time, the second car waiting his turn in the "slow" lane until the first one left. This was not covered in great detail on TV but there appeared to be room without impeding the team in the next garage.
Wasn't that Ferrari in Canada?
Peter Mallett is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Aug 2000, 12:26 (Ref:28044)   #10
Danielsun
Veteran
 
Danielsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 876
Danielsun should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It was indeed, Peter. The only thing that saved Schumacher's race, too, if I remember correctly...
Danielsun is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Panel Beaters Show Don Peppino Australasian Touring Cars. 21 24 Jul 2004 13:28
Stunning new GT4 screenshots JAG Virtual Racers 19 13 Feb 2004 03:03
Panel Bashing ! woodyracing Racing Technology 1 30 May 2001 02:43


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.