|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
13 Jan 2004, 11:09 (Ref:836441) | #1 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Zero Tolerance
Just so your warned, my fello F1 mods and I are getting a little tired of some of the rubbish posted lately.
The off-season is usually a nice quiet time for us. We can relax and recharge the batteries so when the new season comes, we are on the ball so we can continue to try and make this the best F1 forum for everyone. However, the behavior of late of a few members, has been deplorable. Posts have been edited, threads have been closed, and a couple have been suspended or banned. Not good enough. Thread hijacking is worse than ever, and the rubbish thrown in (Anti-Michael, Anti-Juan, Anti- Ferrari, Anti-whatever) that has nothing to do with the thread topic is becoming irritating. So, the F1 mods will be adopting a 'zero tolerence' policy until behavior improves. If your post as a BS comment in it that has nothing to do with the thread, your entire post will be deleted. We wont be warning you first, editing the bad bit out, or ignoring it. Your post will just disappear. Added to this, we are tightening up on flame bait and unnesessary driver/team bashing. The same procedure will apply. Having just removed a 'Ferrari/FIA cheat' post from the Mclaren wing thread (irrelevant???) its getting tiresome. We will keep a list of all members that need this applied, and if we find you are giving us too much work, you'll be looking for another forum. If your unsure about any of this, please feel free to PM me or the other mods. Happy off season Your friendly F1 Mod team. |
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
16 Jan 2004, 00:11 (Ref:839810) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
"Zero Tolerance" Thread
On the whole, I was entirely in agreement with Wrex's comments on behalf of the moderators. However, I was somewhat dismayed to find the thread itseld closed, and therefore next to impossible to discuss.
Don't get me wrong. I get as tired as the next man of a thread suddenly becoming an opportunity to have a go at Jacques Villeneuve, Ferrari or whatever. And I have noticed in recent times that threads have become excessively personal. However... however, it is, surely, a fine line between flagrantly off-topic posts, on the one hand, and the natural and organic development of a thread on the other. One of the joys of message-boards - for me, anyway - is that one topic can lead perfectly logically into another, quite unexpected one. I would hate to think that the actions of a few hotheads who can't confine themselves to arguments and resort instead to ad hominem attacks could stifle the free exchange of ideas on a board like this. Thoughts? |
||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
16 Jan 2004, 00:25 (Ref:839825) | #3 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
BSchneiderFan, from past experience we've found that when an annoucement is made, discussion of it tends to lead to either conflict, complaints, or attacks on the mods. Thus, it is usually 'locked'.
I'm happy to leave this open for now, as I think it's not just the mods that are tired of it, but many members as well. |
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
16 Jan 2004, 02:50 (Ref:839920) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 731
|
In the school system I work for they have zero tolerance too but, no consequences! I'm glad that's not the case here.
|
||
|
16 Jan 2004, 09:11 (Ref:840096) | #5 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,589
|
BSchneiderFan topics developing is something that is allowed. Take the Spa Bus Stop thread. It has lost the original point, but we can always start another thread. The development posts in it are interesting and new to the forum.
However most 'off topic' rambling concerns those few topics that are always discussed. You know the ones I mean! We try to discourage that, because if we didn't every single thread would end up being on a bar room brawl the same (boring) topic. That is not to say that these points can't be discussed, just that they shouldn't be discussed in every thread. A similar situation applies if the forum becomes flooded only with threads with the same intent. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
16 Jan 2004, 13:02 (Ref:840295) | #6 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
EDIT
Thank you Kicking back, that comment (attacking another poster) is precisely why we dont open this annoucements up to discussion. Wrex |
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 21:21 (Ref:840906) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
I'm all for zero tolerance and trust the mods will administer it fairly.
What I don't understand is the point that threads must stay on topic. Sometimes topics lead to other discussions (sometimes directly related, sometimes not) and I don't see how that is a bad thing. If they lead to bashing or pointless bickering then I understand the closure of a thread and I'm all for that. But if the tangent is a natural extension of the discussion, why is not ok to go off topic? Thanks for any comments. |
||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
16 Jan 2004, 21:26 (Ref:840912) | #8 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
I think the mods let you stray off topic, it's only when it's either WAY off topic or something like "Jerez 1997, I hate TGF, blah, blah, nonsense" when the thread is actually discussing Silverstones car parks!
|
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 21:27 (Ref:840913) | #9 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
More an observation than an attack, but point taken.
|
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 22:11 (Ref:840972) | #10 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,299
|
I'm one of the worst for finding a tangential point. I make no apology per se. However I do realise that it can be annoying so I resist as much as possible. Then again. JV. Isn't it time............ Aaaaaaaaaaaaargh nooo Wrex, I''m sorry, it won't happen again!!!!!!!!
|
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
16 Jan 2004, 23:01 (Ref:841040) | #11 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,589
|
If a topic brings up a new point that occurs to you then there is always the possibility of starting a new thread. Especially when the original thread is still new.
Most threads are just left to develop. Maybe if it develops enough and it is easy and clear to do so the thread will be split. However some topics (yes those ones) will obviously destroy the thread and are also irrelevant. When this happens we will mention it. I think there is a distinction between thread hijacking and off topic. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
17 Jan 2004, 01:15 (Ref:841125) | #12 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Maybe I should have been a bit clearer. This will be applied on a case by case basis.
We apreciate the fact sometimes threads 'naturaly' take a different direction. If they develope that way and the thread starter and participants seem to be happy with it we probably wont do anything. What will not tolerate, is an excuse to bash (who/what-ever) or a blatent thread hijack. We will be looking for : - Threads that are page 3+ that have the same 2 or 3 members arguing the same points over and over and over again. - Members who seem to have a 'history' of adding these little 'spitefull' comments. - Comments that have nothing to do with the thread - Spillage of an argument from one thread to another. Its like this. We dont want to have the most members, or the biggest forum. As far as can recall, Craig never has. We want the best forum. If that means make life unpleasant for those that disrupt the site, consider it done. Some may even need to ask themselves if Ten-tenths is the forum for them. If you here for meaningful discussion and will respect the opinion of others, congratulations, you are home. If you love to argue, hate some drivers and teams, and will use any opportunity to say so, please check www.google.com. I have no doubt you can find another F1 forum where the rules are alot easier than here. Note - Kicking back, its not that I did'nt agree with you (believe me), just not the time and place to say so. |
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
17 Jan 2004, 01:41 (Ref:841134) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
BRavo Wrex et al! It has become rather evident as of late it has always seemed to go in cycles based on a few people. But rules enforced tight for everyone is the only, and definitely the best way to go about it
|
||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
17 Jan 2004, 08:30 (Ref:841309) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,338
|
I support (with zero tolerance ) idea of deleting posts that go off topic (not that I never made any of those ) for one simple reason - the 'developed' thread might turn into something completely new&interesting which might be missed by people who didn't participate in original thread 'coz they found it uninteresting.
So, IMHO, it's better to open a new thread - everyone will see it. |
||
__________________
Let it be |
17 Jan 2004, 13:31 (Ref:841535) | #15 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
I guess I just tested the zero tolerance policy out....oops.....
Sorry Wrex! I'll be careful, don't hit me! Please! Last edited by Knowlesy; 17 Jan 2004 at 13:31. |
|
|
17 Jan 2004, 16:43 (Ref:841647) | #16 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
good WRex!! a lot of threads seem to deviate from the original topic which is annoying. (at times i myself am guilty). so good to see that youll be taking strict measures to keep up the quality of the forum!
|
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
18 Jan 2004, 01:10 (Ref:842004) | #17 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
I'm all for it Wrex
|
||
|
18 Jan 2004, 03:07 (Ref:842048) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 12,451
|
Could you go over to the Champ Car Forum and make the same announcement?
|
||
__________________
"If we won all the time, we'd be as unpopular as Ferrari, and we want to avoid that. We enjoy being a team that everybody likes." Flavio Briatore |
18 Jan 2004, 10:30 (Ref:842214) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,917
|
Quote "I'm all for it Wrex"
May i say..me too! |
||
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to." |
18 Jan 2004, 20:38 (Ref:842646) | #20 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 102
|
ME 3
|
||
|
19 Jan 2004, 10:04 (Ref:843105) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,071
|
Good rule. As some might have noticed, I don't post here on ten-tenths as much as I used to it, and some of it's because of this very reason. Cheers Wrexy
|
||
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan. |
19 Jan 2004, 11:41 (Ref:843158) | #22 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
It's good to see how many support this action.
What about the rest... |
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
19 Jan 2004, 11:54 (Ref:843161) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Definately a good move. I enjoy ten-tenths more than any other forum, because the quality of debate is so high, with so many knowledgable intellegent members constructing logical intersting debate and many genuinely informed practcial suggestions. Certain members have a habit of dragging this down, and more control is needed.
|
||
|
20 Jan 2004, 04:46 (Ref:843553) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,196
|
As long as we can still have a giggle...
|
|
__________________
"You can get lucky and win one championship but not two ..." Jamie Whincup. I wonder which person with the initials RK he was referring to. |
20 Jan 2004, 18:37 (Ref:844369) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,174
|
Have I been a good boy chaps?
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's with 'Zero tolerance'??? | ljakse | Announcements and Feedback | 9 | 12 Feb 2004 20:36 |