|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Oct 2014, 23:19 (Ref:3467223) | #1001 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 912
|
|||
|
22 Oct 2014, 00:35 (Ref:3467242) | #1002 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 704
|
Quote:
So far my 2 programs for 2015 are directly related to my goal of getting to LM24 (and being able to win, not drive around) but it probably won't happen for 2015. Still holding out hope, but I need to get faster and be surrounded by strong programs to show it to enough people. Then, maybe if I'm lucky, I'll be able to find a ride in France! -mike |
|||
|
22 Oct 2014, 02:23 (Ref:3467259) | #1003 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 337
|
|||
|
22 Oct 2014, 02:34 (Ref:3467264) | #1004 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 704
|
Quote:
-mike |
|||
|
22 Oct 2014, 07:34 (Ref:3467306) | #1005 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
|||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
22 Oct 2014, 15:19 (Ref:3467412) | #1006 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 857
|
GTD Entry List tracker 2015 GTD entry list tracker: http://nasportscar.com/entry-list-so...usc-gtd-class/
|
||
__________________
North American SportsCar |
22 Oct 2014, 15:22 (Ref:3467415) | #1007 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 626
|
|||
__________________
-Peder Baeckman- 2017 695 Abarth XSR 180hp Brembo, Koni |
23 Oct 2014, 10:10 (Ref:3467582) | #1008 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
23 Oct 2014, 14:22 (Ref:3467647) | #1009 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 857
|
|||
__________________
North American SportsCar |
23 Oct 2014, 16:25 (Ref:3467667) | #1010 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
|
||
|
23 Oct 2014, 17:10 (Ref:3467674) | #1011 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
You know, they could just introduce some innovation like putting hybrid technology other than putting bodykits in the Prototype class.
Honda can pull that one off with their NSX GT500 car so why not apply it to LMP2 cars. |
|
|
23 Oct 2014, 17:14 (Ref:3467677) | #1012 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
http://gordonkirby.com/categories/co..._is_no456.html |
|||
|
23 Oct 2014, 17:18 (Ref:3467679) | #1013 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
Curran and Dane Cameron in the Action Express / Whelan car, could be a strong combination at some rounds.
http://www.racer.com/imsa/item/11012...ameron-in-2015 |
||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
23 Oct 2014, 18:31 (Ref:3467695) | #1014 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,869
|
Quote:
|
||
|
23 Oct 2014, 18:57 (Ref:3467698) | #1015 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
Bad Management. That's it. Top down, clean house... it wouldn't matter which cars, or which rules these guys presided over, they'd screw it up. |
|||
|
23 Oct 2014, 19:52 (Ref:3467703) | #1016 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Then again they could have the most brilliant management staff of all time and no one would care if the grid was filled by NASCAR trucks bopped together with spec Cup Porsches and IMSA Lites.
|
|
|
23 Oct 2014, 20:32 (Ref:3467713) | #1017 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 613
|
Quote:
This is the main issue of NASCAR owning sportscar racing, not the fact that its NASCAR, but the fact that nepotism and greed drives every decision. IndyCar has the same problem. |
|||
|
24 Oct 2014, 01:48 (Ref:3467791) | #1018 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
IndyCar and TUSC—Comparison and Contrast of Symptoms
Not sure I agree about IndyCar having the nepotism problem. Tony George has a few friends on the board but the sisters and Mari seem to have been sufficiently scared by Tony's profligacy and the economic downturn (which, I hear rumors, hit them pretty hard) that he doesn't actually run anything, and his decisions don't matter much. Mark Miles and Derrick Walker seem to be in charge—one is a real racer and the other, I think comes from professional tennis—not long-time Hulman associates. IndyCar's worst issues are manifold, but the two biggest I see are too long with no thought of profit and too long with no one in charge of the teams—the opposite of the situation at NASCAR-land, where there is ample money and the teams pretty much toe the line. In IndyCar the team owners recall the days of CART when (they thought) they ran things (right into the ground eventually.) The teams won't always play along for the greater good of the series, even if it would eventually be good for the teams as well, because they aren't good businesspeople or in any way objective (IMO—and as with all generalizations, it is not specifically applicable in detail or in whole to all the teams.) Most telling, half of IndyCar was run with no thought of profit for about 15 years, and the other half was taken over by a few people who wanted all the profits, all the trophies, and all the say. (Hard to figure how that didn't work.) With no one really thinking of how to build a strong series for the sake of the series, and no one really caring if the series was healthy so long as the next check cashed (or the other half's next check didn't) no one bothered to listen to the fans or to watch what was happening to the series; it was all about either "winning" the Split or raking in the profits, not about the racing or the fans who supported the racing. Hence ... very few fans, no money, and even though the management now knows what the fans pretty much want, they can't deliver because they don't have the cash to promote, to modify, to open the rules, to experiment ... NASCAR can't change the management because it is (I think) such a solid (inbred) team, where personal loyalty makes the difference ... and also, because NASACR has its own "Vision" of how to market race-affiliated mass entertainment–screw racing, it's an entertainment corporation, more akin to Disney than to the NHL or NBA. (HSN instead of NFL?) No one has the cojones to question the "Vision" even after it has plainly failed in certain cases ... it's like Pontiac going ahead with the production of the Aztek even though a blind corpse can see everything about the car sucks. No one can see past the corporate "Vision," so the Emperor is naked And he has a crappy ride. But ... the LMP1 issue is a thorny one. Here is where TUSC and IndyCar share a problem: no cash for the advertisers. Not enough fans to make the RoI sweet enough to sell the series to the accountants. Porsche, Toyota, Audi know they can sell their cars just as well in America with or without a racing program (shoot, Toyota trades the top spot with GM (on GM's home turf) every quarter or two.) And ... a P1 program is So expensive ... really only the Le Mans name can bring the kind of promo fodder the accountants can accept. Winning the Detroit Grand Prix just doesn't do it for a prospective Audi customer. The only way to make P1 work in TUSC would be to allow P1L and if any P1H cars entered, to boost the Ls until they could beat the Hs—otherwise the series wouldn't get the privateer teams it needs, because it isn't going to get the factories no matter what. Thing is, that would squeeze PC/P3 off the grid (Hurrah!) but since P2 is so expensive, the "entry-level" P class might be beyond the financial reach of most teams—and those teams need to show RoI to their sponsors as well, and can't either. The last few years of ALMS were really the "Will Muscle Milk get its electrics right?" show—the car could lose eight laps at Lime Rock and beat Dyson, or four laps at Road America and only lose by about three-thousandths. The second Rent-a-Dyson was always about as quick as the middling P2s ... Rebellion could have won about everything it wanted if it had stuck around another season to learn the ALMS ways. I am sure many of us enjoyed those races, but that doesn't mean that that is the standard we should aspire to—because that was a series crawling to the morgue and barely making it. Sure, it only takes two cars to make a race—but it takes a lot more to make a good racing series which can earn enough money to stay alive. ALMS proved that more than adequately. NASCAR needs to do a couple things, I think: it needs to get a little creative (fat chance) and try a different formula for running (and sometimes killing) a racing series, it needs to lay out a little more cash to get TUSC into the magazines and onto TV both in ads and on Fox (or other) channels which fans actually can watch, and it needs to be talking with teams and P1 manufacturers about the possibility of bringing in a P1L class in the next few years. Maybe, eventually, P1H teams would look over and see TUSC thriving and consider an entry, maybe not. Maybe P1L will fade away because everyone will be running hybrids in a few years (except IndyCar and TUSC.) Maybe no teams would be willing to invest in a P1 chassis to take a chance on racing in TUSC, which right now looks maybe sixty-forty to make it to 2017. Of course I don't know. However, I am pretty sure (as is Gordon Kirby) that if TUSC keeps turning inward and backward by 2020 it will be running cars so pointless and worthless no one will watch its races even if they are on all three broadcast networks. TUSC might survive until 2017, but if it looks like rumors have it now, it won't survive until 2025. No one cared about Rolex, and Rolex 2.0 will be received about the same. Last edited by Maelochs; 24 Oct 2014 at 01:55. |
|
|
24 Oct 2014, 06:01 (Ref:3467833) | #1019 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Quote:
Still, no wonder that the tagline "one chance to get it right" will never ever happen in TUSC! |
||
|
24 Oct 2014, 16:27 (Ref:3467979) | #1020 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 442
|
Per Facebook, Dorsey Schroeder is no longer employed by Fox. So, he won't be in the booth next year. Hopefully that means we'll see more of Tommy Kendall and Justin Bell.
|
||
|
25 Oct 2014, 01:39 (Ref:3468135) | #1021 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
Did Dorsey leave of his own accord?
|
||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
25 Oct 2014, 02:04 (Ref:3468136) | #1022 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 704
|
|||
|
25 Oct 2014, 02:19 (Ref:3468141) | #1023 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 442
|
https://www.facebook.com/dorsey.schroeder
Quote:
|
|||
|
25 Oct 2014, 03:22 (Ref:3468145) | #1024 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
Sucks to hear that,but why couldn't it have Been Calvin fish and bored varsha.lol
Wonder what's going on. |
||
__________________
RACE CAR: noun: an automobile built or modified for racing. |
25 Oct 2014, 05:40 (Ref:3468177) | #1025 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
Quote:
Thanks. I'll miss him more then the other two if they got let go. Should've got rid of Varsha instead. |
|||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2015 IndyCar schedule | NaBUru38 | Indycar Series | 330 | 19 Jun 2015 12:11 |
IMSA 2015 Tudor SportsCar Championship schedule | NaBUru38 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 8 | 16 Jul 2014 04:35 |
What cars would we like in TUSC, but aren't eligible entries? | TRspitfirefan | North American Racing | 154 | 7 Apr 2014 17:14 |
Laguna rumors and entries | HORNDAWG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 45 | 16 Oct 2008 14:45 |
Petit Le Mans 2008 Rumors / Entries Thread | mattcat | Sportscar & GT Racing | 570 | 2 Oct 2008 18:47 |