Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Club Level Single Seaters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 Nov 2014, 21:40 (Ref:3477983)   #1
TheCAB
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5
TheCAB should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Mono 2000 Engine Specification

Hi,

Bit of information required please. In the Mono2000 class as I understand you have to run "standard" road going engines, which are not meant to be "an engine made up from a collection of standard parts".

In re-building an engine to run in Mono what are you "allowed" to do to the engine. Can you replace pistons, polish internals, balance reciprocating parts or is that all a no no. Headwork are you allowed to do anything, reduce seat widths, polish ports, etc?

Cheers
TheCAB is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Nov 2014, 22:25 (Ref:3478009)   #2
andrewc
Veteran
 
andrewc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Norwich, UK
Posts: 946
andrewc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Valves diameters, crankshafts, camshafts, cams, pistons, rods, combustion chamber volumes, timing, porting all has to stay as per road car.

You can dry sump the engine, fit smaller racing flywheel, do what is required to remove ancilliary devices that road cars have but racing engines don't need, fit your own exhaust, and fit individual throttle bodies. Injector size free. Mapped to suit.

So most people take the fitting kit from an F3 engine and fit them to the road car engine that the F3 engine was developed from, and different throttle bodies / exhaust as those are optimised for restricted engines.

http://www.monoposto.co.uk/wp-conten...-Version-1.pdf

5.7.1 (a) Modifications Permitted:
i Fuel injection systems including ECU, to the specification for Formula Vauxhall/Opel (up to
1999), Formula Renault Sport (up to 1999), or Formula 2000, is deemed to comply. Original specification fuel injection may be replaced by carburettors. Throttle body fuel injection may be used. Restrictor plates, with specified apertures to effectively reduce performance, may be required following notice.
ii Dry sump lubrication system permitted, together with modifications to engine castings necessarily required to enable fitment.
iii Standard flywheel may be replaced. Flywheel is free.
iv Ignition system is free.
v Big end bolts free.
vi Valve guide material: free
2014 St Cross Electronics Mono Championship PUBLISHED COPY Version 1 Page 9 of 18
vii Valve spring retaining cap material: any ferrous metal
viii A re-bore allowance in accordance with manufacturers specification up to 0.5mm; together with
manufacturers specification replacement pistons. No additional machining to recover original
compression ration is required or permitted as a result of this modification only.
ix Cylinder head gasket plane may be machined in order to recover a warped head. Original
specification compression ratio must be recovered by local machining to the combustion chamber in the head. All such work must be reported to the Eligibility Scrutineer who may specify a combustion chamber volume and request to examine the head before use.
x Where fuel injection is used, ECU and wiring loom are free.
xi For Ford Zetec engines valve timing is free: camshaft and crankshaft valve timing pulleys must remain standard.
andrewc is offline  
__________________
Andrew Cliffe - Norwich Photo & Racing Exposure
Quote
Old 24 Nov 2014, 14:05 (Ref:3478219)   #3
TheCAB
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5
TheCAB should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Andrew, thanks for the reply.

Can you "blueprint" the engine to maximise factory specs or is the principle supposed to be that the engine is more like "straight out of a road car".



Cheers,
TheCAB is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Nov 2014, 15:07 (Ref:3478244)   #4
andrewc
Veteran
 
andrewc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Norwich, UK
Posts: 946
andrewc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
As many engines are used in different cars in different specs, you can't cherry pick the best bits of different engines to built a supposed best-spec option which was never actually made - i.e. the head from an an Escort, the cams from an Orion, the block from a Sierra and the rods from something else.

Do modern manufacturing processes which are a lot tighter than days of old, permit too much blueprinting in the traditional sense? A lot of effort for a tiny gain?

The spirit behind the regulations is to provide a reliable engine that isn't highly stressed, that has a long service life and is easy to get bits for and for the average Joe to maintain.

I suspect there are bigger gains from throttle bodies, mapping and manifolds than engine internals.
andrewc is offline  
__________________
Andrew Cliffe - Norwich Photo & Racing Exposure
Quote
Old 24 Nov 2014, 19:00 (Ref:3478303)   #5
TheCAB
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5
TheCAB should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Andrew,

Cheers again for the response, no issues with your logic there.

Sorry for more questions, in relation to throttle bodies I see that individual bodies are restricted to 40mm diameter.

Do they therefore need to be a 40mm parallel body, or is the 40mm the restriction for the inlet manifold side of the body i.e. could be a a tapered body say 42mm- 40mm, is the 40mm the butterfly size restriction.

Cheers,
Colin
TheCAB is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Nov 2014, 19:41 (Ref:3478327)   #6
andrewc
Veteran
 
andrewc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Norwich, UK
Posts: 946
andrewc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
There was a 40mm restrictor but that clause was removed either for the start of this season or the start of last season.

Lap records set with 38mm throttle bodies still stand today.
andrewc is offline  
__________________
Andrew Cliffe - Norwich Photo & Racing Exposure
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a definitive Elan 26R specification? Greg Cozier Motorsport History 7 1 Feb 2013 18:27
Mono 2000, faster than MSV F3 Piripi Aki Club Level Single Seaters 12 11 Nov 2011 09:42
Jaguar XF 5.0 Litre V8 specification Daniel Pinnegar Road Car Forum 4 10 Dec 2009 18:36
Mono 2000 Fading? skmanuk Club Level Single Seaters 65 6 Sep 2006 16:53
Sierra RS500 specification Adam43 Motorsport History 11 15 Oct 2002 18:14


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.