Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 Oct 2015, 10:38 (Ref:3578817)   #126
Casper
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
Casper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridCasper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greem View Post
Saward's entitled to his opinion, just as we all are. Doesn't mean we all have to agree *or* disagree, and if he is forced to live in an echo chamber by virtue of the wonderful debating skills that his detractors have, so be it.

I happen to agree with some of what he says, and disagree with other bits. I find his writing style a bit awkward (it's all a bit too first-person for me) but I'd never let that get in the way of someone sounding off. He's at least articulate, really rather knowledgable, and he doesn't simply follow the herd like lots of other writers on the matter.
He undoubtedly has some good points but he will persist in dismissing other peoples opinions with an arrogant one word answer and treats most people who want to debate things with disdain. Anyone who shows more knowledge than him he will not debate or simply write ''I disagree". It may go down well with some people but it leaves me cold and the whole blog appears to me to attract only people who agree with him and tell him he is the greatest. You only have to read the responses to see that as hardly anyone else is there. Maybe I am a grumpy old man but he is not my cup of tea at all but as you say we are all entitled to an opinion.
Casper is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Oct 2015, 14:37 (Ref:3578849)   #127
chillibowl
Veteran
 
chillibowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Canada
winnipeg, canada
Posts: 9,719
chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!
i much preferred when he masked his first person narrative behind the Mole and the various Penelopes.
chillibowl is offline  
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there
I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place
Quote
Old 2 Oct 2015, 20:59 (Ref:3578935)   #128
Paradise City
Veteran
 
Paradise City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Bhutan
Dublin
Posts: 4,320
Paradise City is going for a new world record!Paradise City is going for a new world record!Paradise City is going for a new world record!Paradise City is going for a new world record!Paradise City is going for a new world record!Paradise City is going for a new world record!Paradise City is going for a new world record!
Saward is a fine guy but isn't saying anything original really. In broad terms, it's views that we articulate on here from time to time.

The rub is in the implementation and how to pry away vested interests and to give this sport a bit fresh air and reform to see these plans and principles at work. Getting vested interests to give up their cashcow or reduce their cashcow for long term conservation of this sport is nigh on impossible in political terms -- unless the EU forces the issue.
Paradise City is offline  
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse.
-Henry Ford
Quote
Old 3 Oct 2015, 11:34 (Ref:3579014)   #129
Casper
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
Casper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridCasper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Everyone in F1 has a vested interest from the cleaner to the team principal so they can't be just done away with. It is the greed and corruption that would be nice to see gone but no one ever got rich by being honest my mum used to say. You could say even the journalist who covers the F1 circus has a vested interest in the good health and occasional scandal of F1.
Casper is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Oct 2015, 20:47 (Ref:3579825)   #130
alan1302
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
England
Doncaster, UK
Posts: 135
alan1302 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper View Post
He undoubtedly has some good points but he will persist in dismissing other peoples opinions with an arrogant one word answer and treats most people who want to debate things with disdain. Anyone who shows more knowledge than him he will not debate or simply write ''I disagree". It may go down well with some people but it leaves me cold and the whole blog appears to me to attract only people who agree with him and tell him he is the greatest. You only have to read the responses to see that as hardly anyone else is there. Maybe I am a grumpy old man but he is not my cup of tea at all but as you say we are all entitled to an opinion.
To be fair on a personal blog I'd not put up with a lot of the whining type posters you see in the comments on there. I find it quite refreshing to see someone basically being told to just shut up! LOL
alan1302 is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Oct 2015, 21:47 (Ref:3579840)   #131
Casper
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
Casper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridCasper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by alan1302 View Post
To be fair on a personal blog I'd not put up with a lot of the whining type posters you see in the comments on there. I find it quite refreshing to see someone basically being told to just shut up! LOL
Yes, it is a personal thing, to me it is him trying to be king of the kids.
Casper is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Oct 2015, 22:02 (Ref:3579845)   #132
wnut
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillibowl View Post
i much preferred when he masked his first person narrative behind the Mole and the various Penelopes.
Agree with you Chilli.

The Mole was really well done and humorous. He could do worse than resurrect the Mole.
wnut is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Dec 2016, 22:43 (Ref:3699421)   #133
wolfhound
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Ireland
Posts: 3,547
wolfhound should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridwolfhound should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridwolfhound should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridwolfhound should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Dieter Rencken has been writing in Autosport about team budgets for 2016. He has come up with approx figures for each team based on what he could find from various sources, that likely to be close to the actual income and expenditure of each team. As most teams spend what they get in income usually equals expenditure but not always.

Starting at the bottom in £ millions

sponsors, shareholders/owners/other, FOM, Total

Manor 20, 30, 35, 85
Sauber 30, 25, 40, 95

Renault 25, 80, 45, 150
Haas 10, 90, 00, 100

Toro Rosso 15, 40, 45, 100
Williams 50, 00, 60, 110

McLaren 120, 00, 65, 185
Force India 30, 10, 50, 90

Ferrari 150, 00, 150, 300
Red Bull 55, 55, 110, 220

Mercedes 82, 50, 133, 265

Notes on those figures
Half of McLaren's sponsorship comes from Honda.
Haas gets no FOM money as it is a new team.

The FOM money is split into 2 groups where Ferrari, Red Bull, McLaren, Mercedes and to a small extent Williams get extra bonus figures of £80, £56.6, £25, £56.6 £7.5 million.
Ferrari's FOM money of £150 million is more than the FOM income of any 3 of the non bonus teams combined.
NB I could not get the spacing to work properly on the figures

Last edited by wolfhound; 31 Dec 2016 at 22:53.
wolfhound is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Jan 2017, 00:35 (Ref:3699451)   #134
wnut
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!
If the above figure is correct for Mercedes ....
What without any engine budget, and some huge costs sunk in previous years?!

Their salary bill alone must be eye watering with that management structure and the number of people they have "incentivized" to join them.

Driver salaries for 2016:

http://www.f1reader.com/#/news/f1-20...ed-most-162225

Max for 500 000 Euros, major bargain! Youth wages?

RBR probably have the best driver pairing now, and are paying peanuts!
wnut is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2017, 18:25 (Ref:3699724)   #135
chillibowl
Veteran
 
chillibowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Canada
winnipeg, canada
Posts: 9,719
chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Ferrari needs to get its act together.

for me, calls for a budget cap falls to the wayside the moment there are two teams competing at the sharp end at the same time...and if one of those teams was Ferrari then i would also care much less about their extra money.

just speculation on my part, but i think its entirely possible that the declining TV numbers has a lot to do with Ferrari's almost decade long decline...perhaps even to a greater degree then the move behind a paywall/failure to embrace social media/internet.
chillibowl is offline  
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there
I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2017, 18:34 (Ref:3699730)   #136
Richard C
Veteran
 
Richard C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,803
Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!Richard C is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillibowl View Post
for me, calls for a budget cap falls to the wayside the moment there are two teams competing at the sharp end at the same time
Probably true, but even that would not a healthy situation. We talk here on the forum about the various problems with F1, but clearly the Mercedes dominance is not helping things. So that fosters talk of "fixes" of which budget caps is just one.

But IMHO, a budget cap is more to help the smaller teams than it is to tear down the bigger ones. To your point, if there was a tighter race at the front, there would be less complaining and by extension, less less talk of "fixing things" and helping the smaller teams be competitive. Small teams in financial distress also fuels budget cap talks. Maybe we need a team or two to collapse.

Richard
Richard C is offline  
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one."
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2017, 18:58 (Ref:3699737)   #137
chillibowl
Veteran
 
chillibowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Canada
winnipeg, canada
Posts: 9,719
chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!
for sure i am a believe in budget caps but in all honesty what would be a realistic cap number that would give the smaller teams the chance to compete?

40mil was a ridiculous suggestion by Max, and the current small team budget region of sub 100mil is still way too low and honestly would probably lead to a more mundane sport to watch overall.

as i said i like the idea of budget caps, but being honest, the ideal cap number for me would be one that allows Williams to be in the mix and less about protecting the small teams like Sauber and Manor. ultimately it still has to be high...like plus 200mil a year and increase each year.

the small teams will never hit those budgets cap or no cap and sadly would still face the same problem of folding.
chillibowl is offline  
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there
I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2017, 19:13 (Ref:3699742)   #138
wolfhound
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Ireland
Posts: 3,547
wolfhound should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridwolfhound should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridwolfhound should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridwolfhound should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
If the current bonuses that Bernie's favored teams get were removed and every team was to get another £20 million from Bernie it would leave a more even playing field and Bernie would have some change in his pocket.

If that were to happen only 3 teams would lose a significant amount of money namely Ferrari, Red Bull and Mercedes. Mclaren would lose about £5 million and everybody else would gain

Fat chance of that happening though.
wolfhound is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jan 2017, 07:41 (Ref:3699840)   #139
Moneyseeker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,169
Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!
The BRDC are saying that the future for the British GP is 'bleak' and are apealing to Liberty regarding a freeze or cut in the hosting fee. So it will be interesting to see what response they get and no doubt part of what Liberty has bought is the heritage of F1's heartland that sells it to the rest of the world.

If the BRDC get any support from Liberty we can expect a queue behind them from other significant but struggling venues, which could ultimately impact on the figures quoted that go to the teams as they are determined from the overall income.
Moneyseeker is online now  
Quote
Old 3 Jan 2017, 08:37 (Ref:3699851)   #140
chunder
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
England
Stevenage
Posts: 8,298
chunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The hosting fees are utterly preposterous, when you consider Bernie also owns the trackside advertising too, so the only way BRDC can recoup money is to force ticket prices up and up.

These are the things that need sorting out, not the teams budgets. There is not much you can do about that and all sport suffers from disparity.

Also, hosting fees have now dripped down into all sorts of rubbish championships that do not slightly warrant hosting fees, like SBK, WRX, WTCC. And them having that fee means the series does not go to good tracks, it goes to tracks that can afford the hosting fee and has the budget to cover it.

This also means series never have a stable calendar, as when you sign a deal to host a series, it is never just for one year, usually two or three, to hold tracks in for profit for a while and make sure the revenue is steady for at least a few years.

It is ruthless money making and is part of the reason why motorsport as a spectator sport is falling off a cliff.
chunder is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jan 2017, 09:05 (Ref:3699858)   #141
Moneyseeker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,169
Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!Moneyseeker is going for a new lap record!
Silverstone have hit the ceiling on ticket prices, hence the predicament they find themselves in. The guy who came in to turn the business around cut the general ticket price but of course that they needs even higher sales to get the same income, following which there was a plan to create another 25,000 grandstand seats as an 'arena' layout, but they have no funds to build those.

Sorry OT!
Moneyseeker is online now  
Quote
Old 3 Jan 2017, 10:17 (Ref:3699868)   #142
old man
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
England
UK
Posts: 2,007
old man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridold man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridold man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Chunder is correct IMO, as most posters know I feel personally that there is no chance of a budget cap working. Better distribution of income, perhaps not purely on merit but with the equivalent of starting money (equal for all starters) plus reward for points scored. I wonder if we should consider points for all finishers? I see this as an urgent matter but we could lose a big name.

Newey has reignited the wind tunnel ban idea but that is not workable and would impact most on the smaller teams who do not have a bank of knowledge to call on. In any case you cannot ban wind tunnel research by non F1 bodies, Cranfield for example must teach students and students will undertake research. Ferrari will research airflow for the GTE car and so on.

If Liberty are serious in wanting to even things out hosting contracts do also need prompt attention. In any commercial activity there has to be an element of risk and reward
old man is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jan 2017, 10:30 (Ref:3699873)   #143
chunder
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
England
Stevenage
Posts: 8,298
chunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
It is fairly hilarious the Silverstone thing, especially when you consider they have just announced plans to build a rallycross circuit! lol.

Budget caps never work, unless you want to introduce a spec formula. And even then if a team wants to attract a huge sponsor and the budget cap is say 100 million, all they do is do what they do in football and say someone like Puma has announced a 100 million kit deal or renaming a stadium or whatever. They haven't at all, Puma probably only put in 10, the rest is from Marlboro or Emirates or something. Or has already been paid and this is the teams way of revealing it as per law.

There are always ways round it, that's why sports teams have clever lawyers and marketing teams.

For me the hosting fees situation needs addressing urgently. It is utterly ruining a lot of worldwide motorsport. Perhaps not the higher echelons like MotoGP and F1 (though quite why we need 4 GP races in Spain is amazing to me, isn't it Dorna you Spanish greedy men). But certainly series like WEC, WTCC, SBK, rallycross, even some big national series. Charging circuits is a thing of a time, it is not a thing of our time, that time is gone and it only still exists because it is seen as the template of how to run a series. Namely F1, no others really warrant hosting fees to the level they are.

When you have championships going to places that have no interest, no passions for motorsport and they last the contract length and disappear as quickly, you have to ask questions as to whether they should have even been present or not.

But money talks.
chunder is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Jan 2017, 15:03 (Ref:3700138)   #144
old man
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
England
UK
Posts: 2,007
old man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridold man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridold man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Dieter Renkenen poses the question in Autosport as to where do the biggest teams spend (or waste?) all the money and quotes a figure of about £90 million as the real cost of running a two car team.

His piece also suggests that the real difference between the front of the grid and the back is <2 secs measured at Barcelona (he is suggesting for the purpose of the piece Lewis is worth only 1 second over Haryanto). Is the cost of finding those 2 secs really £150 million is his basic question. By my reckoning that is 0.14 secs per corner at that circuit, a small gain in straight line speed would cut that.

So what is the real impact of the vast budgets on the performance and again one asks, what would a top driver get out of the Manor car?
old man is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Jan 2017, 15:08 (Ref:3700139)   #145
old man
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
England
UK
Posts: 2,007
old man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridold man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridold man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Further question of course is, if the smaller teams chose drivers on merit rather than budget how much closer would they be?
old man is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Jan 2017, 16:42 (Ref:3700153)   #146
billy bleach
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Ireland
Cork
Posts: 2,418
billy bleach should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridbilly bleach should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by old man View Post
Dieter Renkenen poses the question in Autosport as to where do the biggest teams spend (or waste?) all the money and quotes a figure of about £90 million as the real cost of running a two car team.

His piece also suggests that the real difference between the front of the grid and the back is <2 secs measured at Barcelona (he is suggesting for the purpose of the piece Lewis is worth only 1 second over Haryanto). Is the cost of finding those 2 secs really £150 million is his basic question. By my reckoning that is 0.14 secs per corner at that circuit, a small gain in straight line speed would cut that.

So what is the real impact of the vast budgets on the performance and again one asks, what would a top driver get out of the Manor car?
Having read some of his work over the years I would suggest Dieter Renkenen is little more than a talking head with no deep grasp of things - more theory than fact. His take on the VW crisis / F1 some time age was laughable.
billy bleach is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Jan 2017, 22:51 (Ref:3700223)   #147
JABWOA
Veteran
 
JABWOA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Australia
3rd star to the left
Posts: 660
JABWOA should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by old man View Post
Further question of course is, if the smaller teams chose drivers on merit rather than budget how much closer would they be?
Not that far.
Even if Lewis (for example) did their pre-season testing and told them all the areas that needed improving, they still wouldn't have the resources to put those changes in place and test them.

We've seen with Minardi what can happen with a class (albeit young) driver and a small budget. Plus the youngsters these days with access to money can actually drive. The days of Diniz are long gone.
JABWOA is offline  
__________________
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know that is not true." -Robert Wilensky
Quote
Old 5 Jan 2017, 07:48 (Ref:3700261)   #148
chunder
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
England
Stevenage
Posts: 8,298
chunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Diniz was not a bad driver in some cases, he got plenty of points and was often closer to the odd team mate than he ought to have been!

There were plenty more pay drivers worse than him! Belmondo, Deletraz, Lavaggi, Amati, Inoue!
chunder is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Jan 2017, 11:28 (Ref:3700287)   #149
old man
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
England
UK
Posts: 2,007
old man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridold man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridold man should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by old man View Post
Further question of course is, if the smaller teams chose drivers on merit rather than budget how much closer would they be?
Taking a very general look at the drivers in F1 they could be divided into two groups. One would be those drivers who's ability attracted backing from inside the sport at an early stage in their career and the other would be those who had backing from outside the sport that gave them their career development.

Should a smaller team suddenly find themselves with an extra $20million to spend would they get better/quicker results buying more engineers and developing marginal gains across the whole car or buying one of the first group of drivers?

As they say in exams: Discuss


Last edited by old man; 5 Jan 2017 at 11:33.
old man is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Jan 2017, 11:56 (Ref:3700290)   #150
chunder
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
England
Stevenage
Posts: 8,298
chunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I think you will find that even some of the bigger talents on the alleged ladder bought considerable wealth with them to be in F1.

There are rumours that Max and Sainz for instance, though projected as taken on the RB ladder both paid huge amounts to get into the programme.

Think about it logically. It is clear to see now that Max was ready for F1, but it was a big risk at the time, backed up by nothing but rumour and hype. That is a big risk for any team to take, and would only be allowed through money, not anything else. Every young buck says they are the next best thing, but it's harder and harder to prove it now and back it up.

Don't believe the hype that is spun to you is what I would say.
chunder is offline  
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone who can finance this beauty for me? Marcus666 Formula One 16 29 Sep 2012 18:03
Car Finance Carrie Road Car Forum 12 22 Mar 2002 12:35
F1 Finance & Bernie's Empire Schume Formula One 1 17 Jul 2000 16:42


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.