Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > National & International Single Seaters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 May 2005, 19:22 (Ref:1304808)   #1
Andy Roberts
Racer
 
Andy Roberts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 393
Andy Roberts should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Autosport Porsche Young Driver Farce!

Autosport, January 13th 2005, Page 135
"with the emphasis on younger drivers currently struggling to find funding to showcase their talents"

This is how I along with every other Autosport reader read the article about Autosport backing the Porsche GB guest car in 2005. Finally I thought, a real chance for some drivers like myself who struggle for years on end just to make it out on the grid in anything you can muster the money together for, to show what your really capable off.

I voted for several friends in the same position as me so it was a bit of a shock when the first driver was an ex McLaren Autosport Award finalist. Fair enough Dan Eagling wasn't currently racing though lack of funds and I don't think he is now but upon reading Autosport today I am totally shocked that Autosport have given the next drive to Susie Stoddard!

I've met Susie a few times and she is a lovely girl, but hold on, isn't she currently racing in British Formula 3? I thought the emphasis was on drivers struggling to find funds, yet here Autosport have managed to pick a driver who is racing in a championship where drivers regularly pay in excess of £250k per season! No disrespect to Susie on this but how can you pick a driver who has raced continually for the past 4-5 seasons in top line championships like Formula Renault UK, Formula Ford, currently Formula 3 and who was twice an Autosport Award finalist as "struggling to find funding". I know how hard it is to raise funding as I've been trying to do it for the past 8 seasons and the only way I could continue my racing was to get a 2nd job and save every penny I had to go racing. Even with this 2nd job I've still not raced solidly for 2 years now, unlike people like this.

I'm not angry, just disappointed that Autosport could actually do something like this. I'm sure Susie will "struggle" along in F3 for the rest of season and I wish her well, and I'm sure many more drivers out there who didn't get the chance, to continue on in there 2nd jobs just hoping they can get that extra bit of cash to go racing, whenever that next may be.

Shame on you Autosport.
Andy Roberts is offline  
Quote
Old 19 May 2005, 19:39 (Ref:1304828)   #2
Russfeld
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,840
Russfeld should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
And with her ankle problems, is it really responsible of Autosport and Porsche to risk further injury?
Russfeld is offline  
Quote
Old 19 May 2005, 19:47 (Ref:1304841)   #3
sceptic
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,571
sceptic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I don't think there was ever any doubt that the drivers selected by Autosport would be those who were already rated highly by Autosport, and who had already achieved something significant.

I believe that they have already decided the drivers for the full season, although I haven't seen the list.
sceptic is offline  
Quote
Old 19 May 2005, 19:48 (Ref:1304843)   #4
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russfeld
And with her ankle problems, is it really responsible of Autosport and Porsche to risk further injury?

She says the injury is manageable in a car like a Porsche, but would be bashed around too much in a single seater.

Which may or may not be true
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 20 May 2005, 08:58 (Ref:1305180)   #5
No 4
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 751
No 4 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
"with the emphasis on younger drivers currently struggling to find funding to showcase their talents"

Andy has got it totally right. There are loads of young drivers out there, e.g. Mike Spencer and Ben Clucas, who have proven talent, but who are not currently racing due to lack of funds.

In this context, Susie very definitely does not qualify as 'a young driver struggling to find the funding to showcase their (her) talents'. Therefore, what we need is a representative of Autosport to come on here justify/defend the magazines choice of her and indeed their selection policy/criteria in general. However, don't hold your breath, as I think there's as much chance of that as Plato and Muller becoming bosom pals!!!
No 4 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 May 2005, 11:07 (Ref:1305273)   #6
Craner Curves
Veteran
 
Craner Curves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United Kingdom
Kelso
Posts: 4,399
Craner Curves should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridCraner Curves should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridCraner Curves should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridCraner Curves should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
There's a pattern isn't there. Herself and Dan Eagling were Autosport finalists and then there's Gordon Shedden who they've given some backing to over the past couple of seasons. I did see a list of the guest drivers for every meeting this year, but god knows where I saw it. Can't remember.
Craner Curves is offline  
Quote
Old 20 May 2005, 16:41 (Ref:1305529)   #7
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Hillclimb star Adam Fleetwood and ex-Formula Vee champion Jeremy Clark are also due out.
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 20 May 2005, 16:41 (Ref:1305531)   #8
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Autosport are paying the bills and can do as they please, of course.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 20 May 2005, 18:29 (Ref:1305596)   #9
No 4
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 751
No 4 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Exactly. Money talks in the rest of motorsport, so why should Autosport be any different! However, why couldn't they have been upfront about this, instead of putting out claims that were open to misinterpretation, in that most people took the "with the emphasis on younger drivers currently struggling to find funding to showcase their talents" wording, to mean drivers who had real ability, but who didn't have family or corporate money to take them onto the next stage of their careers.
No 4 is offline  
Quote
Old 20 May 2005, 18:40 (Ref:1305608)   #10
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well, for those who don't believe she's injured, Susie is a driver who's struggling to find funding
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 27 May 2005, 20:48 (Ref:1311932)   #11
Jamie P-E
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 151
Jamie P-E is a back marker
i know for a fact she is injured
Jamie P-E is offline  
Quote
Old 27 May 2005, 21:13 (Ref:1311968)   #12
Craner Curves
Veteran
 
Craner Curves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United Kingdom
Kelso
Posts: 4,399
Craner Curves should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridCraner Curves should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridCraner Curves should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridCraner Curves should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Good for you.
Craner Curves is offline  
__________________
Don't exacerbate things!
Quote
Old 28 May 2005, 05:19 (Ref:1312176)   #13
Fiorentina 1
Veteran
 
Fiorentina 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
United States
Calabasas Hills, California
Posts: 860
Fiorentina 1 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridFiorentina 1 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
You know when someone does these kind of deals, there will always be people that are angry at the outcome. If she is indeed racing full time, then it does suck that Autosport picked her if their objective was to find someone not racing. I don't know the whole scope of things, but from what Andy says it sucks. Personally, I would have picked Jonathan Cocker. I tried to get him to race at the Daytona 24 hours with a team I was working for, but I couldn't juggle the budget to fit him in. Hopefully next year. I understand he is racing in Asia, but not what he should be racing. Anyways, Autosport knows that susie Stoddard generates interest, so this is the reason they picked her. It might be the fact that one of Autosport's advertisers is paying for this deal and they wanted a marketable driver as well. It does suck that there are so many capable British drivers out there with no ride. I read last weeks Autosport and couldn't believe the quality guys sitting on the sidelines.
Fiorentina 1 is offline  
Quote
Old 28 May 2005, 09:28 (Ref:1312275)   #14
keithc
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4
keithc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Autosport are a bunch of wasters anyway !
keithc is offline  
Quote
Old 28 May 2005, 10:05 (Ref:1312310)   #15
racingdad
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 723
racingdad has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiorentina 1
Personally, I would have picked Jonathan Cocker. I tried to get him to race at the Daytona 24 hours with a team I was working for, but I couldn't juggle the budget to fit him in.
James Cocker hardly qualifies as a struggling driver - someone spent a lot of money last year taking an unknown and untested driver, putting him in the best team with one of the best professional GT drivers - that was not cheap.
racingdad is offline  
Quote
Old 28 May 2005, 10:49 (Ref:1312342)   #16
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Autosport printed Andy's letter.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Autosport Porsche young driver initiative. kartingdad National & Club Racing 15 12 Apr 2005 10:44
Autosport Young Driver Award Clyde Ankle National & International Single Seaters 22 11 Mar 2002 09:40
Who should win the Autosport Young Driver Award? rlinter National & International Single Seaters 140 3 Dec 2001 21:19


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.