Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 Dec 2008, 14:15 (Ref:2359245)   #1
Kiki
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 50
Kiki should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What if: Merging American Sports Cars.

Of the two major road racing series in the US, I'm gonna have to say ALMS piques my interest much more than Grand Am. Regardless, I had a crazy idea so bear with me.

LMP1 - There's likely only three LMP2 entries for 2009. All of which can be converted to P1 spec with little work. That gives a relatively healthy field of LMP1 factory teams and privateers. (ACO compliant)

DP - The near-spec racers provide great racing but not much in the way of high-tech. Great for privateers with no interest in running at Le Mans.

GT1 - For the sake of simplicity lets say GT500 rules. Not as fast as DPs, but certainly not going to be bothered by GT2s. A costly but interesting classification. Let the tube-frame Grand-Am guys run with bigger wings, etc.

GT2 - No change (ACO compliant)

You want healthy fields? Merge Grand-Am and ALMS. Now I know, it'll never happen, but how cool would it be? Hell, what if ACO decided to run this class architecture?

There could still be separate Grand-Am and ALMS races, like Daytona 24h (LMP's on an oval?!) and Petit (DP's through the esses!?) but the joint races could make up the majority of the season and would make for damn good road racing.
Kiki is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Dec 2008, 14:33 (Ref:2359251)   #2
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Dont tell the GARR - They are just happy with the way things are as is.
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 21 Dec 2008, 14:39 (Ref:2359254)   #3
juicy sushi
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
in a pool of wasabi and soy sauce
Posts: 361
juicy sushi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiki
Of the two major road racing series in the US, I'm gonna have to say ALMS piques my interest much more than Grand Am. Regardless, I had a crazy idea so bear with me.

LMP1 - There's likely only three LMP2 entries for 2009. All of which can be converted to P1 spec with little work. That gives a relatively healthy field of LMP1 factory teams and privateers. (ACO compliant)
converted to LMP with little work? uh, no. it would be very expensive and not very productive.

Quote:
DP - The near-spec racers provide great racing but not much in the way of high-tech. Great for privateers with no interest in running at Le Mans.
they're not very cheap to run. the better teams are spending multiple millions per year to fight for a championship.

Quote:
GT1 - For the sake of simplicity lets say GT500 rules. Not as fast as DPs, but certainly not going to be bothered by GT2s. A costly but interesting classification. Let the tube-frame Grand-Am guys run with bigger wings, etc.
gt500 is not equivalent to grand-am gt, and is nothing like what you're talking about. they're much faster, and much more expensive. plus, current grand-am gt is about as fast as FIA GT3. they're not GT1 capable. GT1 is a dead concept, you may as well accept it.

Quote:
GT2 - No change (ACO compliant)

You want healthy fields? Merge Grand-Am and ALMS. Now I know, it'll never happen, but how cool would it be? Hell, what if ACO decided to run this class architecture?

There could still be separate Grand-Am and ALMS races, like Daytona 24h (LMP's on an oval?!) and Petit (DP's through the esses!?) but the joint races could make up the majority of the season and would make for damn good road racing.
it would add cars, but the two series have very different management with very different goals. a merger just isn't something that's going to happen. you may as well as the DTM to merge with the LMS...
juicy sushi is offline  
__________________
have a nice diurnal anomaly...
Quote
Old 21 Dec 2008, 15:20 (Ref:2359264)   #4
Speed-King
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Wuerzburg,Germany
Posts: 7,325
Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!
Here's another what if:

Assuming the economy gets even tougher than it is today and the powers that be come to the conclusion that America can't sustain two major sportscar series and decided to meet halfway between the ACO and the NASCAR philosophy to phase in a new ruleset.
It would look like this:
- 2 classes of Prototypes: LMP(1) and AP (American Prototype)
- LMP is the current LMP1-cars with all the innovation and technology of the current LMPs
- AP is a hybrid between DP and 2011-LMP2: tubeframe-chassis with a carbon-fibre safety-cell like a DTM-car, roadster design, production based engines and cost-saving measures like steel brakes. Manufacturers in LMP are encouraged to supply engines for the AP-cars. Cars must be available to all teams wishing to purchase one. No factory cars.
- a 14 race schedule consisting of Daytona/Sebring*/VIR/Barber/Road America*/Watkins Glen/Mid Ohio/Mosport*/Montreal/Lime Rock/Utah*/New Jersey/PLM*/Laguna Seca*
- The LMP-championship consists of 6 races (indicated by *) to help out privateers in LMP.
- The AP-cars run the full schedule and are the headlining class at the 8 events where the LMP-cars are not part of the action.
- Like in FIA-GT two-driver changes per race are mandatory, this allows the the LMP-manufacturers to help out teams running their engines in the AP-category by lending their factory drivers to them in the AP-only races.


Now, why would anyone do something like this?
- First of all: This thread is about reckless speculation and I am a bit bored, so don't take it too seriously.
- I think that the philosophy behind the DP-experiment as a privateer-friendly class is right.
- The execution however is severly flawed. I like the cars, but they failed to catch the imagination of a big part of the sportscar fan-base and can therefore not considered to be a full sucess.
- The AP-class is therefore designed to retain the strenghts of the DP-concept while doing away with its failures.
- LMP-cars and privateer teams seem to work in Europe with a relatively short schedule of relatively long races. They don't seem to work that well on an American style schedule with a greater number of shorter races.
That's why their participation in my Imaginary American Sportscar Championship (IASC) is limited to 6 races, each of them four hours or longer.

Discuss!
Speed-King is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Dec 2008, 15:40 (Ref:2359273)   #5
mountainstar
Veteran
 
mountainstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
United States
Posts: 6,885
mountainstar should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridmountainstar should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridmountainstar should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I want nothing to do with Nascar. They already have too much influence in american motorsport.
mountainstar is offline  
__________________
Wolverines!
Quote
Old 21 Dec 2008, 17:43 (Ref:2359323)   #6
alwayswatching
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 87
alwayswatching should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Good ideas & thoughts and to some degree I concurr, however, with the greed and arrogance of the Frances & Nascar.............NEVER going to happen!!!
alwayswatching is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Dec 2008, 18:34 (Ref:2359337)   #7
Canada ALMS fan
Veteran
 
Canada ALMS fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Canada
Calgary, Canada
Posts: 2,296
Canada ALMS fan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCanada ALMS fan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCanada ALMS fan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainstar
I want nothing to do with Nascar. They already have too much influence in american motorsport.
Wiser words have never been spoken. To that list you can add Tony George.
Canada ALMS fan is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Dec 2008, 20:02 (Ref:2359373)   #8
johntt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
England
England
Posts: 1,244
johntt should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Heres my idea:

Full switch to ACO rules, have the P1, P2 and GT2 classes. No need for DPs or GT1.

The GARRA teams that can't fit into ALMS can filter into Speed World Challenge, Patron GT3 Challenge. Keep the KONI Challenge, have heard good things about it as a series.

The Daytona 24 will be a non-championship race using ACO Protos and GTs, an independent event in the sense that Le Mans is.

As for the schedule (all 2 hour 45 minute races unless noted):
Daytona 24 (Non-championship)
1. Sebring 12 Hours
2. St Petersburg 2 hours
3. Houston 2 hours
4. Long Beach 1hr 40 mins
5. Miller Motorsports Park
6. VIR
*Break for LM*
7. Daytona 250 miles
8. Lime Rock
9. Mid Ohio
10. Road America 4 hours
11. Mosport
12. Trois Rivieres
13. Watkins Glen 6 Hours
14. Sears Point
15. Portland
16. Road Atlanta Petit Le Mans 1000 miles
17. New Jersey (provided it can be brought up to spec)
18. Laguna Seca 4 Hours.
johntt is offline  
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna
Quote
Old 21 Dec 2008, 21:50 (Ref:2359428)   #9
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
How about IMSA see's out '09 as best they can, then adopts 2011 regs a year earlier.

At the very least that would see Dyson and any larger P2 teams back in P1 against Acura and Corsa, both of which have easy access to a 3.4l engine, leaving P2 open for smaller budget teams to run production engined LMP's.

Currently P1 and P2 costs are similar, but once teams have the opportunity to run a 911 or Chevy GT2 motor, costs should drop and potentially more teams will enter.

If the GT regs aren't clear by mid year, retain GT2 as is, and introduce GT3 with the full knowledge it will be a performance balanced class.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2008, 07:20 (Ref:2359543)   #10
Kiki
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 50
Kiki should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed-King
This thread is about reckless speculation and I am a bit bored, so don't take it too seriously.
I'm glad someone gets it.
Kiki is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2008, 21:31 (Ref:2359889)   #11
Bob Riebe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Minnesota
Posts: 2,351
Bob Riebe User has been fined for unsportsmanlike behaviour!
GTO-- no diffusers, no wings unlimited tire width, over 220 inch cubed class.
Weight to displacement, blower equivlency.

GTU-- sane as gto except under 220 inches cubed.

Sports racer/ prototype-- unrestricted diesels, no wings, no aero aids.
Bob Riebe is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2008, 22:17 (Ref:2359899)   #12
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
isn't 220 CI kinda small ??
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2008, 22:32 (Ref:2359907)   #13
duke_toaster
Veteran
 
duke_toaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
European Union
Englandland
Posts: 5,100
duke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridduke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
3.6 litres is certainly not small!
duke_toaster is offline  
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier."
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2008, 22:45 (Ref:2359916)   #14
slick42
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2008
England
Selby, North Yorkshire
Posts: 209
slick42 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think I like Grand Am more than the ALMS. (dont hurt me) The cars may be slower and uglier but theres more competition, and overall better racing

I think merging the two together just wouldn't work. I don't think Ganassi, Stallings, Penske, Childress, Brumos would be content with class wins which is likely all the DPs would come out with. Plus all the testing that would be needed to take an LMP to Daytona and Homestead.

I don't know why i've never gotten into ALMS, it just might have been the fact that it was basically Audi winning over and over which i didnt find all that entertaining. I do like the ALMS schedule better than Grand Ams, i wish Grand Am went to Sebring, Road America and Road Atlanta.

Last edited by slick42; 22 Dec 2008 at 22:54.
slick42 is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2008, 22:51 (Ref:2359921)   #15
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke_toaster
3.6 litres is certainly not small!
Depends on your perspective.
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2008, 23:34 (Ref:2359950)   #16
HORNDAWG
Veteran
 
HORNDAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Oregon
Posts: 8,919
HORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
What if: Merging American Sports Cars.


NO!!




L.P.
HORNDAWG is offline  
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent
Quote
Old 23 Dec 2008, 10:36 (Ref:2360083)   #17
johntt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
England
England
Posts: 1,244
johntt should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by slick42
I don't know why i've never gotten into ALMS, it just might have been the fact that it was basically Audi winning over and over which i didnt find all that entertaining. I do like the ALMS schedule better than Grand Ams, i wish Grand Am went to Sebring, Road America and Road Atlanta.
Audi may win the P1 class over and over, but the ovrall victories have been tightly contested between the Audis, Porsches and Acuras. GT1 has only had the Corvettes, but the sound they make is amazing . GT2 has been a tight battle between Porsche and Ferrari and halfway through next year we'll see Corvette joining them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HORNDAWG
What if: Merging American Sports Cars.


NO!!
If it was a 'merger' in the mould of CC/IRL with ALMS playing the part of IRL then I wouldn't complain
johntt is offline  
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna
Quote
Old 23 Dec 2008, 12:05 (Ref:2360129)   #18
PorscheFanNo1
Veteran
 
PorscheFanNo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Sweden
Winner's Circle
Posts: 1,484
PorscheFanNo1 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridPorscheFanNo1 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by johntt
If it was a 'merger' in the mould of CC/IRL with ALMS playing the part of IRL then I wouldn't complain
Neither would I.
PorscheFanNo1 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Dec 2008, 15:36 (Ref:2360231)   #19
slick42
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2008
England
Selby, North Yorkshire
Posts: 209
slick42 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by johntt
Audi may win the P1 class over and over, but the ovrall victories have been tightly contested between the Audis, Porsches and Acuras. GT1 has only had the Corvettes, but the sound they make is amazing . GT2 has been a tight battle between Porsche and Ferrari and halfway through next year we'll see Corvette joining them.
I'll probably watch it a little but closer next year, its probably just impatience on my part
slick42 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Dec 2008, 16:00 (Ref:2360243)   #20
extramundane
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Benin
Here.
Posts: 270
extramundane has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by johntt
If it was a 'merger' in the mould of CC/IRL with ALMS playing the part of IRL then I wouldn't complain
Yeah, because that's a strong business plan to follow.

'Course, the way things are shaking out, the ALMS might well be playing the part of the IRL this year.
extramundane is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Dec 2008, 00:01 (Ref:2360512)   #21
Bob Riebe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Minnesota
Posts: 2,351
Bob Riebe User has been fined for unsportsmanlike behaviour!
Quote:
Originally Posted by extramundane
Yeah, because that's a strong business plan to follow.

'Course, the way things are shaking out, the ALMS might well be playing the part of the IRL this year.
I am guessing that is sarcasm as the IRL is not doing well, includint Indy.
During what is supposed to be a three year centenial celebration, there new engine rules seems to be as popular as a used up whore, of course they have to get that far.
Bob Riebe is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American Sports Car Racing - 1950s TimD Motorsport History 1 8 Jun 2002 10:39


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.