Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: trackrooms.co.uk Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Trackside

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 Jan 2014, 16:10 (Ref:3351680)   #1
JimW
Veteran
 
JimW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 3,362
JimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Mallory - One damn thing after another.

Spectator injury to one eye - Court case.

http://www.nuneaton-news.co.uk/Spect...ail/story.html

Don't know if this will affect BARC now their operating company is in liquidation.

Jim
JimW is offline  
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks.
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2014, 18:46 (Ref:3351714)   #2
mark_l
Veteran
 
mark_l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
England
Posts: 1,646
mark_l should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridmark_l should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I can see Perspex screens being put up around all gravel traps in case someone goes off and showers the gravel, either that or issue a free pair of safety specs to every spectator and official.
mark_l is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2014, 21:18 (Ref:3351796)   #3
MGDavid
Veteran
 
MGDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
England
Berkshire
Posts: 3,809
MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!
...so how does this square with what's written on the back of every ticket and entry form?
MGDavid is offline  
__________________
a salary slave no more...
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2014, 22:30 (Ref:3351818)   #4
JimW
Veteran
 
JimW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 3,362
JimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by MGDavid View Post
...so how does this square with what's written on the back of every ticket and entry form?
Mainly because what is written on the back of forms etc. is of little or no validity in cases like this. The argument might go something like "Is reasonably likely that these cars will throw up stones? - Yes it's Rally cross on loose surface. Is it likely that such stones would reach a spectator are? - Yes. Well you have exposed people to a reasonably foreseeable risk and have not taken appropriate counter measures. ££££

We may think that a pity but it's the law.

Regards

Jim
JimW is offline  
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks.
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2014, 22:39 (Ref:3351820)   #5
grantp
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,371
grantp should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridgrantp should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridgrantp should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
So where would something like this leave a risk assessment for a stage rally?

Thinking further ahead - when will competitors in potentially risky events be prevented from taking part for their own good?

We could start with Marathons (so many amateurs with no real clue about what they are undertaking) and head on through Ironman competitions, any form of off road cycling, especially MTB related, riding horses (for any purpose at all) and of course skiing.
grantp is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2014, 22:47 (Ref:3351825)   #6
JimW
Veteran
 
JimW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 3,362
JimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I don't really disagree but there are crucial differences between "participants" and spectators. Even then, if participants were put at "unnecessary" or inappropriate risk, I'd hate to be responsible.

And as for a Rally stage; there was one at Donington many years ago where a spectator was injured by a flying stone and, if my memory is correct, won the case for damages.

Jim
JimW is offline  
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks.
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2014, 22:54 (Ref:3351828)   #7
ascarracinguk
Veteran
 
ascarracinguk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location:
Infront of my computer
Posts: 3,909
ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimW View Post
I don't really disagree but there are crucial differences between "participants" and spectators. Even then, if participants were put at "unnecessary" or inappropriate risk, I'd hate to be responsible.

And as for a Rally stage; there was one at Donington many years ago where a spectator was injured by a flying stone and, if my memory is correct, won the case for damages.

Jim
More importantly where does this leave gravel traps...using the same argument, circuits put gravel traps beyond the Tarmac, closer to the spectators with the risk of stones flying through the catch fencing into the crowd.....I've seen it happen!
ascarracinguk is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Jan 2014, 07:44 (Ref:3351920)   #8
GORDON STREETER
Veteran
 
GORDON STREETER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Spain
Kent+Mojacar Spain, but not always ?
Posts: 9,400
GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!
Looks like it's best to stop in bed and watch everything on the box !
The ambulance chasers seem to sod everything up !!!
GORDON STREETER is offline  
__________________
Balls of steel (knob of butter) They're Asking For Larkins. ( Proper beer) not you're Eurofizz crap. Hace más calor en España. Me han conocido a hablar un montón cojones! Send any cheques and cash to PO box 1 Lagos Nigeria Africa !
Quote
Old 9 Jan 2014, 09:32 (Ref:3351947)   #9
flagwaver
Veteran
 
flagwaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
England
Yorkshire
Posts: 923
flagwaver should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If people read the whole story they have got a better understanding of why the prosecution happened.

When they created the rallycross track at mallory, just before the startline they created a "rough area" as part of that circuit. Thus moving the "circuit" closer to the spectators.
What they should have done but didn't was to move the spectator area further back at that particular point.

A similar prosecution is unlikely to occur on a rally stage as it is generally not a "fixed venue" Hence why the instance at Donington that Jim talked about would unlikely to be applied to a forest stage in Keilder for instance
flagwaver is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Jan 2014, 11:14 (Ref:3351970)   #10
andy97
Veteran
 
andy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
United Kingdom
Castle Donington
Posts: 4,982
andy97 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridandy97 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by MGDavid View Post
...so how does this square with what's written on the back of every ticket and entry form?
You can't predict where and when accidents at race circuits will occur, or the severity, but circuits/ organisers are expected to make a judgement and mitigate risk accordingly, hence the separation of spectators from very close to track side. However, I guess the point of the note on the back of the ticket is that it covers unintended consequences in a sport where accidents do happen - circuits/ organisers will make their most reasonable endeavours to make it safe but every eventuality cannot be covered.

In this case, it may have been reasonable to predict that stones would get thrown up on the rally bit of the rallycross track and the circuit/ organisers should have taken measures to mitigate that risk - ie move the spectators back a distance. They didn't. In fact the spectators were closer to the track then when normal circuit racing occurred, but the risks of something being dislodged and going into the crowd were higher.

Circuits/organisers do have a responsibility to make the circuits a safe as practicably possible and to reduce risk to as low as reasonably possible.

Where do the MSA stand in this? presumably someone licenced the track and deemed it safe?
andy97 is offline  
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy
Quote
Old 9 Jan 2014, 20:20 (Ref:3352169)   #11
Asp
Race Official
Veteran
 
Asp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
England
Cumbria, UK
Posts: 4,697
Asp has a real shot at the championship!Asp has a real shot at the championship!Asp has a real shot at the championship!Asp has a real shot at the championship!Asp has a real shot at the championship!Asp has a real shot at the championship!
flagwaver has hit the nail on the head here - the obligation under the HSA is to limit exposure to risk "so far as reasonably practical".

Having a live circuit with significant risk of "spray" from stones near to spectators isn't limiting that exposure.

A gravel trap is different - cars shouldn't be going there and, even if they do, "spray" isn't likely to be directed towards spectators.

A rally stage is different - bigger length and less spectator density makes it less reasonable to offer protection (but there's still excluded areas where the risk is higher). A closed circuit has got less of an area that needs considering.

I don't think this really changes anything - the law is not different - it's just critical that circuits, clubs and the MSA (which is a great point raised by andy) need to monitor the situation, perform risk assessments at correct times, and take what action they feel is appropriate.
Asp is offline  
__________________
DDMC Rescue Crew, Post Chief & Flag Marshal
Quote
Old 9 Jan 2014, 21:12 (Ref:3352196)   #12
yesnomaybe
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 204
yesnomaybe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
poor chap

Sounds like the problem area is the gravel section to the side of the normal start and finish straight. This bit of track can be seen near the control towers shadow on the image in the web site page linked to in post 1

I guess this explains why they'd fenced off a big section of the spectator area at that point of the track, for the event in 2013

"motorsport is dangerous, so you are present at your own risk" from a legal stand point, even though they made a change to the circuit route, i cant understand how they can ignore this, those notices would have been up and the same thing on the guys admission ticket

you can still be pelted by gravel if a car goes off, at clearways for example, you learn to turn away
yesnomaybe is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Jan 2014, 10:12 (Ref:3352341)   #13
JimW
Veteran
 
JimW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 3,362
JimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid

Quote:
Originally Posted by yesnomaybe View Post
. . .
"motorsport is dangerous, so you are present at your own risk" from a legal stand point, even though they made a change to the circuit route, i cant understand how they can ignore this, those notices would have been up and the same thing on the guys admission ticket. . .
In order to understand this you just need to read some of the contributions above.

Jim
JimW is offline  
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks.
Quote
Old 10 Jan 2014, 13:20 (Ref:3352400)   #14
Tim Falce
Race Official
Veteran
 
Tim Falce's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
England
Very edge of S E London almost in Kent
Posts: 11,141
Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!
I think I may have missed the point of this thread, "One damn thing after another". I don't see how It's going to affect Mallory apart from they might have to get their act together regards the rally track, if It's going to be used again that is.
Probably inevitable that someone would be prosecuted under elf an safety, who foots the bill for the fine is another matter. Next step will be a compensation claim which will be handled by MPMS's insurers, apart from that I can't see an issue.
Tim Falce is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Jan 2014, 14:05 (Ref:3352422)   #15
JimW
Veteran
 
JimW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 3,362
JimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
My main point was to share information. But reputational damage by (unfair) association) is never a good thing.

And I guess the MSA's insurers will be footing the bill, assuming, of course, that everything was in accordance with the track licence, permit etc.

Regards

Jim
JimW is offline  
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks.
Quote
Old 10 Jan 2014, 14:53 (Ref:3352440)   #16
andy97
Veteran
 
andy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
United Kingdom
Castle Donington
Posts: 4,982
andy97 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridandy97 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The MSA are not in the dock, although I guess they may be called as a witnesses. The Operators don't exist anymore but the Promoters (Lydden Hill) do and they are named in the action along with Amy Doran specifically.

Doubt that the MSA insurers will be involved. I am no expert but surely it will be the Public Liability Insurers for Lydden Hill and Amy Doran herself who will have to pay out IF it's found that there is a compensation case to anwser
andy97 is offline  
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy
Quote
Old 10 Jan 2014, 15:10 (Ref:3352445)   #17
JimW
Veteran
 
JimW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 3,362
JimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The public liability insurance for an MSA permitted event (which I am assuming this was) is provided by the MSA through the permit fees which clubs pay. It's one of the key things which the MSA does.

Regards

Jim
JimW is offline  
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks.
Quote
Old 10 Jan 2014, 15:39 (Ref:3352463)   #18
yesnomaybe
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 204
yesnomaybe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I've have read the entire thread Jim, bit presumptious and rude for you to suggest otherwise, my point is that when it gets to court they'll definitely look at those "present at your own risk" statements as a reason not to pay up
yesnomaybe is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Jan 2014, 16:15 (Ref:3352475)   #19
flagwaver
Veteran
 
flagwaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
England
Yorkshire
Posts: 923
flagwaver should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
THIS IS NOT A CLAIM FOR INJURY (although that may happen) This is a prosecution brought under the Health & Safety at Work act.

If there is a claim now I suspect it will follow the lines of "because they failed to adhere to the HSAWA 1974 my client was injured" What is said on a bit of paper or stated anywhere else on the circuit will not apply as they haven't adhered to the the law of the land.

Otherwise I could just leave a live wire exposed at work, but just make sure there are plenty signs saying you are here at your own risk.
flagwaver is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Jan 2014, 16:23 (Ref:3352477)   #20
JimW
Veteran
 
JimW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 3,362
JimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by flagwaver View Post
THIS IS NOT A CLAIM FOR INJURY (although that may happen) This is a prosecution brought under the Health & Safety at Work act.

If there is a claim now I suspect it will follow the lines of "because they failed to adhere to the HSAWA 1974 my client was injured" What is said on a bit of paper or stated anywhere else on the circuit will not apply as they haven't adhered to the the law of the land.

Otherwise I could just leave a live wire exposed at work, but just make sure there are plenty signs saying you are here at your own risk.
That's exactly the point (fact?) I was trying to make.

Jim
JimW is offline  
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks.
Quote
Old 11 Jan 2014, 12:39 (Ref:3352776)   #21
medius
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
England
Media Office hiding from the rain
Posts: 1,808
medius should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridmedius should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Did anyone read the article?

''Mallory Park (Motorsport) Ltd pleaded guilty to failing to conduct its undertaking in such a way as to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable, that spectators were not exposed to a risk to their safety arising from the event, in contravention of Section 3 of the Health and Safety At Work Act 1974.

Sentence on the company, which has been in administration since the beginning of October 2013, has been adjourned until after the conclusion of further court hearings relating to the incident.''


I take that as, the old operators were in the dock and held their hands up. Nothing to do with the new operators, nothing to do with the current venue. I don't think Rallycross has been mentioned in the new business plan, so its reasonable to assume RX won't be coming back to Mallory for changes to need to be made.
medius is offline  
__________________
From redshoes: ''I have no idea who the second Team Hard driver is, and I suspect after the name is announced I'll be none the wiser.''
Quote
Old 12 Jan 2014, 19:04 (Ref:3353141)   #22
Pescara Productions
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
United Kingdom
The worst road in Leicestershire
Posts: 65
Pescara Productions should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sadly I think this may put the Rallycross scene off Mallory which is a huge shame as it has been the best event I've gone to since it started and it bought in good crowds. I think I was stood close to a Marshall when someone said over his radio that there had been an injury, then they put up some tape around the area which has been there at every RX meeting since I think. I film at the exit of Edwina's and I'm still pretty close to the track. There's been a few close encounter's with the late Ryan Lawford's rolling up on the fence, as well as one of the Tigra's flicking up a massive piece of earth that landed just beside my feet. I just hope the new owners don't go catch fence crazy.
Pescara Productions is offline  
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tyre War - Good thing or bad thing? Yoong Montoya Formula One 15 11 Jun 2003 19:57


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.