 |
|
19 Jun 2017, 11:35 (Ref:3745174)
|
#136
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,665
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzeiTzei
That's almost double the racing hours for a season. Expensive.
|
The racing hours are NOT the great expense in racing. They are testing for as many or more hours that that at their own expense.
|
|
__________________
It was fun while it lasted, have enjoyed the people I've met but the measuring contests and arguments over who's more insider and who's smarter has just made it not worth the effort any longer. It should be fun, not work and it's just work to find actual information.
|
19 Jun 2017, 12:25 (Ref:3745191)
|
#137
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,397
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96
The racing hours are NOT the great expense in racing. They are testing for as many or more hours that that at their own expense.
|
Right!!! This type of races would replace the several days of 30 hours of tests done by the brands. And besides we all know that there is no better test than the same race.
|
|
|
19 Jun 2017, 12:28 (Ref:3745194)
|
#138
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,203
|
I think Le Mans shows that GTE does deserve a higher profile. IMSA gives GTLM the respect it deserves and it is treated as a joint co-premier category along with DPI.
|
|
|
19 Jun 2017, 15:38 (Ref:3745242)
|
#139
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,091
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96
The racing hours are NOT the great expense in racing. They are testing for as many or more hours that that at their own expense.
|
The privateers?
|
|
|
19 Jun 2017, 19:30 (Ref:3745334)
|
#140
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,665
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzeiTzei
The privateers?
|
Some of them are testing more than you would think, they still need the data as well. And running Ams only at race events is no where near enough time to get them situated. And those who can't afford it should prob stay in the national series, that's what they are there for I believe??
|
|
__________________
It was fun while it lasted, have enjoyed the people I've met but the measuring contests and arguments over who's more insider and who's smarter has just made it not worth the effort any longer. It should be fun, not work and it's just work to find actual information.
|
19 Jun 2017, 20:25 (Ref:3745353)
|
#141
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,091
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96
Some of them are testing more than you would think, they still need the data as well. And running Ams only at race events is no where near enough time to get them situated. And those who can't afford it should prob stay in the national series, that's what they are there for I believe??
|
So what kind of a budget would we be talking about in this 24h series?
|
|
|
19 Jun 2017, 20:30 (Ref:3745356)
|
#142
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 5,462
|
I'm sure they discussed on MWM that an LMP2 team budget is £3-4m a year for ELMS, and an extra million for WEC.
|
|
|
20 Jun 2017, 02:18 (Ref:3745406)
|
#144
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,941
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deggis
|
Odd timing. Or is it?
|
|
|
20 Jun 2017, 02:44 (Ref:3745410)
|
#145
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,642
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeb
Odd timing. Or is it? 
|
I don't see anything intentional here (if Bernie was still in control, it would probably be a week earlier...). For as long as F1 teams insist on the 3-week August break there aren't that many possibilities. Spectator wise Le Mans will get the usual quarter million visitors no matter what, the GP looks much less certain considering it a new track for F1. The circuits aren't right next to each other but if anything this should hurt the GP attendance.
|
|
|
20 Jun 2017, 03:05 (Ref:3745413)
|
#146
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,687
|
Not a new circuit, but F1 hasn't been to Paul Ricard for a race in over 25 years and after (ironically) Bernie Eccostone bought Paul Ricard, it was reconfigured into what it is now.
|
|
|
20 Jun 2017, 03:07 (Ref:3745414)
|
#147
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location:
|
where the wind comes sweeping down the.. |
Posts: 3,551
|
Perhaps it might also make it easier for certain F1 drivers (Hulkenberg? Alonso?) to participate in the 24H next year???
|
|
|
20 Jun 2017, 07:42 (Ref:3745453)
|
#148
|
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deggis
F1 2018 calendar was released early. The traditional June 16-17 spot is empty,
|
Le Mans 24h confirmed for June 16-17 at the same FIA Council Meeting http://www.fia.com/news/fia-announce...il-decisions-6
They said they'd release the calendar at a later date and the next meeting is September 21st.
Also Formula E has only one race in June, the weekend between pre-Le Mans test and Le Mans week like this year.
|
|
|
22 Jun 2017, 17:16 (Ref:3746102)
|
#149
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,642
|
WEC and FE have agreed to not have clashes in future, and WEC and F1 have agreed to not have a clash with Le Mans and generally not have races in the same country at the same time.
https://www.motorsport.com/formula-e...n-2018-921432/
|
|
|
16 Jul 2017, 05:56 (Ref:3751568)
|
#150
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,642
|
http://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/n...ay-notebook-5/
Quote:
***Head of Porsche Motorsport Dr. Frank-Steffen Walliser expects that the proposal for GTE qualifying races to be approved for next year. Walliser told Sportscar365 that there’s been “very positive” discussions between manufacturers on the concept. “We have to work on the final things: how many points you will get, and if it’s only grid position or points, because then the motivation is higher. How you handle the tires, how is the parc ferme, what you do if you crash the car, there’s a lot to be figured out. The experts are working on it, but the proposal that we have now is fine.”
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|