|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5 Feb 2003, 04:39 (Ref:496884) | #1 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 157
|
Zues. Nice proto....
http://www.zeusmotorsport.com/
I first saw this car in Racecar Engineering, adn it is definatly a very apealing car. Firstly, its increadibly atractive......and looks pretty high tech for a club racing type deal..... I wish I could scan the article, but I dont have it. What do you think Also, they mentioned they would do a 675 car as well. |
|
__________________
- |
5 Feb 2003, 05:27 (Ref:496912) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 133
|
I've never understood why someone would want to drive this car. Nothing like your head being the main rollover structure.
|
||
|
5 Feb 2003, 05:41 (Ref:496916) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 378
|
The fender sorta reminds me of the Pilbeam...
|
|
|
5 Feb 2003, 06:01 (Ref:496929) | #4 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
|
Good looking ! What's the programm of this one ?
|
||
|
5 Feb 2003, 07:24 (Ref:496964) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
"Good looking ! What's the programm of this one ?" What do you mean, what series does it run in? If that is what you mean, then it runs in the British National Supersports series....Im not totally possitive on the rules.......But they all run a spec Vauxhaul 2.0L engine that makes 220-240hp.....and they weigh 1200lbs. They also have to run a steel space frame.....in order to keep it kinda on a grassroots level... The ideas that impressed me when reading about the car.... One is the idea to use smaller tubbing at the bottom of hte chassis and larger at the top.....I rarely hear this idea, but it only seems natural.....As the top of the chassis is what take the most important loading in turn loading.....and not hte bottom, which is under tension in loading. This way, you can reduce the size (and weight) of the overall tubing, lowering the curb weight. But this car pretty much utilises the same ideas, only scaled down, as a larger LeMans car. So I find it quite interesting. |
||
__________________
- |
5 Feb 2003, 09:33 (Ref:497066) | #6 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
|
Quote:
Thanks Ian. |
|||
|
5 Feb 2003, 10:36 (Ref:497120) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
It can run in Brit Supersports, and the Infinity series.
http://www.i-n-f-i-n-i-t-y.be |
||
__________________
Oops |
5 Feb 2003, 11:13 (Ref:497137) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
...and the Sports Car Challenge.
http://www.gt-eins.de/SCC/index.html |
||
__________________
Oops |
5 Feb 2003, 15:41 (Ref:497379) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,936
|
It won't be competitive in 675 with the aluminum monocoque. Too much weight, gotta go with carbon fiber... Why no one like Dallara, or even one of the F1 manufacturers have stepped up to build a competitor to the MG-Lola, especially using a WRC-derived powerplant (already a well-developed 2.0L turbo, like the Subaru or Peugeot) confuses and dissapoints me.
Lotus should really do one with a bonded aluminum chassis like the Elise, with a turbo 2.0L Proton powerplant. Probably the only project they could undertake while under Proton's ownership... Last edited by Lee Janotta; 5 Feb 2003 at 15:43. |
||
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!" -Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979 |
5 Feb 2003, 16:06 (Ref:497400) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
it isn't a 675...
|
||
__________________
Oops |
5 Feb 2003, 18:35 (Ref:497540) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,077
|
Looking at the design specs for the ZME07, outside of the aluminum monocoque, it does seem pretty interesting. And with the powertrain choices, 8cyl/LMP675 & 6cyl/SR2, there is a way that it can be used by both FIA and IMSA.
The idea of the turbo-4cyl. might also be an alternative choice that both organisations can agree to. I think it might've came down to how much time, effort, and funds a manufacturer would've had to shift from other racing programs, Lee. Sure, there are other companies that may have nothing major happening in the motorsports world at present, but it would have to sanctioned by their committees, and agreed upon by the shareholders as a positive return for the buisness. Otherwise, the manufacture of engines for these racers will have to be built by engineering concerns, such as Cosworth. |
||
__________________
Here's to the new age of Sports car/Prototypes... |
5 Feb 2003, 18:39 (Ref:497549) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
LMP675 cars (both N/A and turbo) are legal in FIASCC but they have to run in SR1.
|
||
__________________
Oops |
5 Feb 2003, 19:25 (Ref:497593) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,077
|
So the competitiveness of this chassis has no issues standing in the way, outside of the weight problem with the aluminum monocoque. Okay.
|
||
__________________
Here's to the new age of Sports car/Prototypes... |
6 Feb 2003, 22:34 (Ref:498929) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,241
|
oh get a grip choked_wasp.
It wasn't after all untill 1966 that the driver's head had to be below the roll hoop in F1 at least. Did you ever have\have you got a roll hoop on your bicycle? |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nice!! | Snips1 | IRL Indycar Series | 3 | 5 Mar 2005 19:35 |
How nice ;). | the_royksopp | Announcements and Feedback | 66 | 6 Dec 2004 00:23 |
GT/Proto | Bob Riebe | Sportscar & GT Racing | 14 | 7 Jan 2004 22:00 |
Anyone have the 89 Proto race at Brands? | Williamp | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5 | 5 Dec 2003 19:00 |