Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 Nov 2003, 04:23 (Ref:777343)   #1
BARrouette
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
out of this world
Posts: 380
BARrouette should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Oval

Would you like to see a oval track in f1 ?
I would like it verry much...
...and it should be in the usa.At the indy, they should race in the same track as the cart does..or indy 500 for f1 ...What do you think?
BARrouette is offline  
__________________
Beep Beep!!!
IF you look in Your mirror it's allready too late , i just passed you...
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 04:58 (Ref:777360)   #2
Zaius
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 31
Zaius should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I am a relatively new F1 fanatic (only been following it closely for 3 seasons), and have never understood the concept of oval tracks in terms of entertainments. I have been told that they are good for the audience, because they get to see everything.

When I ask how one could possibly enjoy watching cars turn left, left, left, left for so many laps, I never got a satisfying answer. Could someone make the case why oval tracks would even be entertaining to watch considering how driver skills factor into the mix (such as negotiating chicanes, etc.. being gone). I simply cannot understand how oval tracks would ever be entertaining, but would love to know how others feel about it.
Zaius is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 05:02 (Ref:777362)   #3
Wrex
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
Wrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Melbourne - Home of the Australian GP
Posts: 7,643
Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!
Me either Zaius

Ovals are for IRL and Nascar. I'm not sure it would be that entertaining to the average F1 punter. There are also other issues with safety (the cars are not built for it).
Wrex is offline  
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 05:04 (Ref:777363)   #4
BARrouette
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
out of this world
Posts: 380
BARrouette should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Oval track is more technical than you think Zaius hard on the tires and on gas, a good driver can make a difference in this kind of track.
BARrouette is offline  
__________________
Beep Beep!!!
IF you look in Your mirror it's allready too late , i just passed you...
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 05:10 (Ref:777366)   #5
Zaius
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 31
Zaius should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'm sorry if my post seemed to imply that I thought oval tracks didn't provide real "racing" in some form. I really think they do, but the difference I think is that while both ovals and non-ovals are hard on tires and on gas, and both involve the drivers making decisions about pitting, how hard they push etc... there SEEMS to me to be another dimension in non-oval that requires the driver to make a tremendous amount of quick decisions regarding negotiating turns, which direction, what gears etc... that IS present in oval tracks, but seems to me to be much less extensive.

This "dimension" is to me a huge reason why watching F1 and other non-oval racing is entertaining. The drivers need their reflexes to be continually sharp (again, something which is present in ovals, but I think less extensive) while still needing to be able to make wise long-term race decisions.

Last edited by Zaius; 9 Nov 2003 at 05:12.
Zaius is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 05:38 (Ref:777378)   #6
Wrex
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
Wrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Melbourne - Home of the Australian GP
Posts: 7,643
Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!Wrex is going for a new lap record!
I guess the best answer to your question then, is with another question. Why dont they race on a dirtspeedway as well then?

Short answer is it is'nt F1.
Wrex is offline  
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 05:40 (Ref:777380)   #7
BARrouette
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
out of this world
Posts: 380
BARrouette should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
True Zaius ...
With 1 oval track in f1 we will see more f1 fans from the USA and maby some rich state guy will trie to build a new team ...
BARrouette is offline  
__________________
Beep Beep!!!
IF you look in Your mirror it's allready too late , i just passed you...
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 05:55 (Ref:777383)   #8
Don Rennis
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
London
Posts: 56
Don Rennis should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Oval racing just doesn’t appear to sit well in the European racing culture. On a personal basis I must admit I don’t really get it.

The newly built Rockingham oval speedway in the UK is basically going broke, attempting to bring the oval racing culture this side of the pond.

I’m sure it’s for the same reason that American football or Baseball doesn’t work here and Soccer doesn’t really work over there. We’re just different.
Don Rennis is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 06:35 (Ref:777409)   #9
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The reason why OVAL seems like good racing is because more or less, everyone in it uses very similar if not identical cars but differing setups, with aerodynamics which are fixed to promote slipstream and passing.

It's a different theory of racing from F1, looking at racing from another angle.

I would like to see Indy reprofiled, using majority of the oval, but at the back straight, put in a tight sequence of right left right and back on the oval...just to promote overtaking.
Gt_R is offline  
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 10:12 (Ref:777574)   #10
jetsetter
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Australia
Ipswich Qld Australia
Posts: 2,508
jetsetter should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No, F1 doesn't need Oval racing. They can leave Oval racing to the Americans.
jetsetter is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 10:29 (Ref:777591)   #11
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
In the early 90s, there were rumoured plans for the evolution of Formula 1 which Bernie wanted to implement for the future, which among other things included only about 12 races to make each race more of a 'special event', and around about 2 or 3 oval races included in the schedule.

Obviously it never happened, but in my opinion an oval race wouldn't be a bad thing, the current breed of f1 cars couldn't race on one though, they are not built to handle an accident on that type of track.
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 10:58 (Ref:777635)   #12
krt917
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Fleet
Posts: 1,814
krt917 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridkrt917 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
And because they're not designed specifically for ovals, they probably wouldn't be that quick. I'm not sure that F1 cars that aren't faster than CART/IRL cars would impress the Americans very much.

I do quite like oval racing, particularly when combined with road and street circuits (as with CART and, hopefully, soon IRL)in a series, but I'm not convinced that it's the way F1 should head. I think we should make sure we've got a few more decent road-racing circuits, like Spa and Suzuka, and get rid of places like the new Hockenheim before we start looking at ovals.
krt917 is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 15:59 (Ref:777945)   #13
gttouring
Veteran
 
gttouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
USB 3.0
Posts: 4,536
gttouring should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The only answer to this would be to make the Indy 500 an F1 round again and dump the Infield.
Make it like the good old days when the F1 circus came and ran with the USAC and Indy boys-everyone will be happy, as an open race the Champcars guys can race and it'll count and there will be no need for IRL or the openwheel bickereing.
but i think F1 should stay clear of ovals, it isn't what F1 has come to be.
gttouring is offline  
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story.
Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET
I am shameless ...
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 16:09 (Ref:777952)   #14
ralf fan
Forum Host
Veteran
 
ralf fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
United Nations
Apartment No.203
Posts: 6,529
ralf fan should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridralf fan should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridralf fan should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridralf fan should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
could be interesting..... but i like it the way it is!!
safety factor would come into play with OVALS.... F1 cars would go with great top speeds and crashing into walls would most certainly be life ending
ralf fan is offline  
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off."
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 16:40 (Ref:777972)   #15
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The Indy 500 as an F1 World Championship round was a joke. The F1 regulars barely entered, and the 500 was dominated by guys who spent most of the season running in the US< never entered other grand prix, and so got false high championship positions.

I think a lot of the driver skill in voals races isn't in goign fast, it's in going faster than everyone else, by positioning the car exactly right, making best use of one of the many racing lines available, and keeping your nerve when running 3 abreast at 250mph.

Appreciating the technical skill and following the strategies is exciting as well.

I hope that sounds exciting to you. Look at all the last-lap shootouts in the IRL this season, and the fact that you rarely go more than a handful of laps without a change in teh order.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 16:41 (Ref:777975)   #16
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
ralf fan - not really F1 would probably be slower than CART on an oval and should be able to with stand the shunts
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 16:52 (Ref:777988)   #17
crozier74
Veteran
 
crozier74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Scotland
Aberdeenshire, Scotland
Posts: 1,065
crozier74 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yes, sounds a bit too dangerous to me, and I doubt the teams and drivers would approve of, and may possibly even boycott, an event on an oval on safety grounds. Although there's nothing to say that F1 cars aren't any less safe on ovals than ChampCars and IndyCars. They are actually licenced to run on ovals you know, according to Appendix O (the circuits section) of the FIA rulebook.

I would like to see maybe one race a year on an oval, just to add some more variety to the sport, and if it was just that one single event then it would have added sparkle in F1 and in motorsport in general. I agree with everything BootsOntheSide says, I appreciate the skill involved in oval racing, and think it should get represented in the top championship of motorsport. A race on an oval would perhaps throw up some interesting results, and the power and reliability factors involved would put an added incentive on the engine designers to get it right for such an event. I don't think it should be at Indy, we don't need another big single-seater race to "rival" ( LOL! ) the 500. Maybe make it at somewhere like Michigan.

But if it were to happen then there should be a regulation put in place that states no more than "x" number of races can take place on ovals in an F1 World Championship, to stop F1 straying too far from its roots, eg. ChampCars started off as an all-oval all-USA series, and look at it now, only 3 or 4 out of 18 events held on ovals, and about 3/4 held in "foreign" countries. And also look at the financial problems its in as a result. F1 can't be allowed to become like that.

Allow one or two oval races, but "keep it real".

Last edited by crozier74; 9 Nov 2003 at 16:59.
crozier74 is offline  
__________________
I am just a cowboy lonesome on the trail
A starry night, a campfire light
The coyote call, the howling winds wail
So I ride out to the old sundown
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 16:59 (Ref:777994)   #18
kristof14
Veteran
 
kristof14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location:
Bury, UK/Bristol, UK
Posts: 1,084
kristof14 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think the recent incidents in IRL and CART would be more than enough of a reason for F1 to decide to never race on ovals.
kristof14 is offline  
__________________
Real men don't use "clients", real men whistle SYN/ACK down the phone
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 16:59 (Ref:777995)   #19
Adam43
14th
1% Club
 
Adam43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
European Union
New Orleans
Posts: 42,625
Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Seeing as we have moved in complete fantasy land now I think a single non-championship oval race with big prizes would work better. And a decent TV deal. Why not run it at Motegi - probably get as much if not more support in Japan.
Adam43 is offline  
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously.
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 17:04 (Ref:778000)   #20
Redblurr
Veteran
 
Redblurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
United Kingdom
Posts: 1,254
Redblurr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
For a second I thought I was in the cricket forum. I say no to oval in F1, it does not do anything for me, in fact after a few laps It would be quite boring to watch.
Redblurr is offline  
__________________
"I never give up I am Michael Schumacher."
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 18:42 (Ref:778065)   #21
racefanatic
Racer
 
racefanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
United States
Mindy
Posts: 393
racefanatic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No no no please no ovals in F1!!! I would be so nervous every lap and we would all have to pray that no one crashed! Plus, the cars wouldn't really be able to handle it, would they? I've been a huge CART fan for quite a while and I watch the IRL, and we need to leave the oval races to them and to NASCAR. Even THEY need to work on them though as far as the safety.
racefanatic is offline  
__________________
In a minute there is time
For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 19:39 (Ref:778089)   #22
Smokey 6 litre
Veteran
 
Smokey 6 litre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
The Total Perspective Vortex
Posts: 1,707
Smokey 6 litre should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think F1 would suffer if it went to an Oval, it MAY recieve a slight increase in viewing figures in America but it would drop dramatically elsewhere.
I beleieve that the best drivers in the world need the best curcuits, and i dont get excited by the prospect of Alonso, Kimmi and Montoya travelling at 220mph with nothing to do!
Smokey 6 litre is offline  
__________________
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now"
Douglas Adams. 1952-2001
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2003, 20:36 (Ref:778152)   #23
pirenzo
Veteran
 
pirenzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
London, UK
Posts: 10,241
pirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Ovals, no! Nearest thing to an oval i'd like to see an F1 car on is Brands Hatch
pirenzo is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Nov 2003, 03:12 (Ref:778384)   #24
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Sure, why not? Ovals are a very pure and concentrated form of racing. If they ran the Indy oval with the same wing they run now then it would be pointless. No skill involved. Oval races can require just as much driver skill, because traditionally the cars are setup very loose compared to a road course setup. A F1 oval race might get boring because the cars are not that close together. Lapping the field on a typical road course would mean lapping the field three times+ on an oval.

There have been plenty of oval races that have not resulted in dangerous situations. The lack of accidents in F1 is partially to do with the lack of close racing. An oval done right should not be any riskier than road races. Road courses have more obsticles to run into. CART has had 3 recent deaths, two of them were on road/street courses. F1 cars would have to be beefed up to safely handle the force of slaming into a concrete wall. That's a big reason why CART and IRL cars weight 200lbs more than F1 cars.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Quote
Old 10 Nov 2003, 03:32 (Ref:778386)   #25
gttouring
Veteran
 
gttouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
USB 3.0
Posts: 4,536
gttouring should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
and the aussie dirt oval Sprint cars are pretty big eh, the states get its fair share of Oz sprint racer going over there- leave the oval to the Yanks?
Nah Aussies are good on em too.
gttouring is offline  
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story.
Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET
I am shameless ...
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
las vegas will be an oval jv#12 ChampCar World Series 3 17 Oct 2003 22:56
Swedish Oval!? OVERSTEER ChampCar World Series 8 7 Aug 2002 13:51
The Blue Oval Peter Mallett Motorsport History 24 30 Apr 2002 13:37


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.