Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 Apr 2001, 11:36 (Ref:78357)   #1
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
How long do you think it will be before someone gets their head chopped off in a pit stop? Just have a look at Faulkner's accident today- not only did he take out his own gantry, but also Larkos... (Did you notice that Larkham had 2, one front, one rear- isn't that twice as bad?)

Also, how about the rattle gun that fell off the back of Faulkner's car- now lucky were the people behind the fence, one piece only just missed the camera. Also, I'd say it was one of those new top of the line rattle guns- how much do they cost?
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Apr 2001, 12:09 (Ref:78363)   #2
tickfordchick
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 101
tickfordchick should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
if I remember correctly, I think they said those new rattles guns were around two thousand dollars each ...

that was a scary moment in the pits ... you make a very good point, Crash Test ... how long before someone is seriously hurt? I also wonder how an allegedly well-oiled and experienced pit crew allows that kind of thing to happen ... I mean, I know it's frantic and it's chaotic, but COME ON!! hmmmmm ...
tickfordchick is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Apr 2001, 12:23 (Ref:78372)   #3
thompson_fan
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Sydney
Posts: 111
thompson_fan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well what about what Garry Rogers said about one of the HRT pit stops, that's just a crime that they didn't get penalised. From my understanding Faulkner should have stopped to have someone get the rattle gun off his car before continuing
thompson_fan is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Apr 2001, 13:00 (Ref:78379)   #4
PBR
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location:
Western Australia
Posts: 42
PBR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What concerns me more is that I didn,t see any stop/go penalty for those things that happened in the pit lane.

So the only real punishment left is to remove thier points and/or send the offending cars to the rear of the grid for tomorrow.
PBR is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Apr 2001, 13:41 (Ref:78389)   #5
marcus
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
marcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Australia
Posts: 12,053
marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!
if it was one of the new rattle guns (am I dont know if it was) they are about $6000 ..so its rather expensive.

pit stops are always dangerous and they should really do something about it before someone gets hurt..maybe somehow limit the amount of airlines allowed by times as this is what the rear wing of Faulkner got caught on..if there is less air lines it at least limits the chances of it happening.

im pretty sure Faulkner got a stop/go penalty for it just that we didnt see it because he was running around at the back and had no bearing on the race results.

the pits stops are going to be a problem..with speeding cars loose wheels and irlines ..things could take a turn for the worse and lets hope cams get onto that one straight away.
marcus is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Apr 2001, 17:02 (Ref:78418)   #6
hypo
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
perth
Posts: 182
hypo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Lets also not forget that some of the other pit lanes at tracks we are yet to visit this year are a bit dodgy......

Thank god there is no compulsory stops at Wanneroo!!
hypo is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Apr 2001, 23:15 (Ref:78490)   #7
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Here's another thought, why not get rid of the wings all together? That's what the lines are being caught on...i couldn't imagine a line being caught on a little spoiler.
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Apr 2001, 00:51 (Ref:78514)   #8
thompson_fan
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Sydney
Posts: 111
thompson_fan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Only problem with that idea Crash Test is that the cars would be all over the road and be endangering the drivers lives.
thompson_fan is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Apr 2001, 02:46 (Ref:78532)   #9
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Not really... the drivers would just have to drive within the limit of the cars, they would be harder to drive, but heck, they're getting paid good money . They are out there trying to entertain us, and more sideways, the better, the more passing, the better. They would only be compromising the cars safety if started removing parts of the roll cage etc..

It's a pipe dream i know, but couldn't they design a better wing that didn't catch the air lines or something?
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Apr 2001, 14:28 (Ref:78636)   #10
PBR
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location:
Western Australia
Posts: 42
PBR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well crash you may have something with the rear wings wouldn’t be too hard to modify the end plates on the fords so they are unlikely to catch a hose, Holden would require a little more effort though.

On the other hand are they really serious about safety in the pit lane, After HRT’s $2000 fine for the wheel incident you have to start wondering, they could have sent Bright to the rear of the grid.

Probably wouldn’t have affected the results though, but everyone would know they are serious about the wellbeing of everybody there.
PBR is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Apr 2001, 12:26 (Ref:78900)   #11
elephino
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location:
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,058
elephino should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridelephino should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Actually, two gantries should be safer than one as it keeps the hoses further away from the car instead of letting them dangle quite close as they did in Faulkner's pit.

Also the rattle gun didn't get caught on the end plate, but through the wing itself. It wasn't the end plate holding it on. And the Falcons are safer in that respect as the hose cannot get around the wing itself, but they have the larger end plate which causes its own problems (see Bathurst 1999).
elephino is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'Bad' pitstops Hazard IRL Indycar Series 2 7 Aug 2004 13:35
Pitstops coxmattycox Touring Car Racing 12 12 Jun 2003 21:23
Pitstops Cougar Formula One 9 23 Apr 2002 16:15
Pitstops - Yes or No racer69 Formula One 15 4 Jul 2001 11:38
Chicanes: an essentail saftey feature or an accident waiting to happen??? Tristan Formula One 17 24 Sep 2000 14:57


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:45.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.