|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Oct 2008, 22:40 (Ref:2308709) | #51 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 192
|
But, then, anyone with any business sense could have seen through the CC owners club, and know things weren't hunky-dorey.
|
|
|
10 Oct 2008, 23:01 (Ref:2308722) | #52 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
Why do people always get upset when Murphy reports on rumors? Is it that hard to see a difference between rumors and news?
|
||
|
10 Oct 2008, 23:12 (Ref:2308734) | #53 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
I could come up with a new nickname and throw out all sorts of rumours that come to the voices in my tiny mind !!!
Hows this for a rumour ..... Rodger Penske , the Captain , is known to be at the sharp end of the stick , which is where he is not at the moment . Meaning that he would probably prefer to be up with Audi in LMP1 . The plot thickens ..... It doesnt appear to make business sense to Peugeot , for a prolonged race program in the ALMS . Peugeot has also said that privateer chassis would be available to the "right" team . Penske on the other hand , probably doesnt care what chassis he runs as long as its works supported and wins . Looking at the 908 ..... I reckon Penske could do just as good a job as the factory team , possibly better with his teams vast knowlage of American tracks . My theory about what penske will be doing come 2009 is this : Penske will run a brace of Peugeot 908 HDI VAP in the ALMS in 2009 . What about that for a theory Murphy ? Last edited by The Badger; 10 Oct 2008 at 23:14. |
||
|
11 Oct 2008, 02:06 (Ref:2308801) | #54 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,630
|
Quote:
DK |
|||
|
11 Oct 2008, 09:11 (Ref:2309008) | #55 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
11 Oct 2008, 14:09 (Ref:2309150) | #56 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,630
|
Quote:
DK |
|||
|
11 Oct 2008, 16:18 (Ref:2309177) | #57 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
11 Oct 2008, 17:32 (Ref:2309210) | #58 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
Although with only 1-2 years of elligibility in the current rules, would Penske want to bother with a current LMP? Perhaps he'll do Grand Am next year while Porsche develops a P1 for the new regulations. Last edited by WMUCarGuy; 11 Oct 2008 at 17:37. |
||
|
11 Oct 2008, 17:44 (Ref:2309212) | #59 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,325
|
There's only one thing wrong with the Peugeot-theory: Next year there'll be new cars from Acura and Audi on track, while the 908 will be in its third year of competition. And the 908 isn't known for its reliability, either, so they can't really hope to win against their opposition on reliability, either.
There's probably just one more year of competitive racing in the car, if at all. Would be quite a risk for Penske. Will Peugeot have a new car for LM(S) 2009 or will they 'just' develop the hybrid car? |
||
|
11 Oct 2008, 17:50 (Ref:2309213) | #60 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
Last edited by WMUCarGuy; 11 Oct 2008 at 17:55. |
||
|
11 Oct 2008, 19:04 (Ref:2309251) | #61 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
Mr Penske does not have an Peugeot franchise. So this makes no business scene for Penske. Oh wait? There are no Peugeot Franchises in the US. |
|||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
11 Oct 2008, 19:23 (Ref:2309263) | #62 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
Why let details get in the way of a foolish fantasy?
|
||
|
11 Oct 2008, 19:23 (Ref:2309264) | #63 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Would it matter to him ..... what he races as long as it wins ?
Im sure he didnt do much business outta Lola . |
||
|
11 Oct 2008, 19:24 (Ref:2309265) | #64 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Oct 2008, 17:59 (Ref:2310358) | #65 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
Penske - Acura someone?
|
||
|
12 Oct 2008, 19:19 (Ref:2310410) | #66 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
I think, not.
L.P. |
||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
12 Oct 2008, 23:38 (Ref:2310624) | #67 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
13 Oct 2008, 01:46 (Ref:2310659) | #68 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
Speaking of "speculation," the idea that Roger would field Peugeot's isn't all that outlandish, as hemicuda pointed out above. If Penske found a sponsor who wanted the exposure of running Peugeots (they'd get huge television and at-track coverage, wouldn't they?) then he'd be right there in a heartbeat. With the margin that the 908 already has on the field and Penske development, driver selection, and race management, I'm sure he could win his share, whether Acura and Audi has a new car or not. If you've seen a Joyce Julius report, you'd realize that the value of coverage a sponsor would get with Penske running the Peugeots would be very substantial, indeed. However, I suspect Murphy hasn't heard any such discussion in the paddock, so he didn't report it. As for Champ Car, it's a little disingenious to say now that "anybody with business sense" would have known. The fact is that either they didn't or didn't admit that they did. ALMS/IMSA flatly rejected the possibility (at least in public) in October of 2007 (ask Fogelhund, he asked the question at the State of the Series), and CC teams mostly claimed it came as a complete surprise. IMSA said they had to "scramble" after the announcement (or some such phrase) in regard to the joint-events schedule. There was no one in these forums who was out there saying with any conviction that CC couldn't/wouldn't finish the 2008 season, say nothing of not starting it. The small bear got a huge load of **** for what he wrote. (And he made up exactly none of it...though he did identify some of it as speculation based on the "facts on the ground.") I guess (as someone wrote in some forum or another) you could just wait until Autosport or Speedtv prints it, because that makes it "more credible." On the other hand, it might be a good idea to check the track record there, too, while you're at it. Murphy really doesn't give a damn whether the rumor turns out to be true or not, actually. He's reporting what someone said...not passing judgment on it (though he does leave out some of the more far-out stuff - occasionally). |
||
|
13 Oct 2008, 05:03 (Ref:2310754) | #69 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 908
|
Penske with Peugeots, or simply some 908s for privateers, why not, is Lola Cars a "road car" constructor ? even though they have some chassis in the ALMS, the same can be done for Peugeot
|
||
|
13 Oct 2008, 14:29 (Ref:2311280) | #70 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
I think Toyota is a better bet. Get the Penske motosports teams in Toyota. NASCAR switch from Dodge to Toytota as well. |
|||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
13 Oct 2008, 14:43 (Ref:2311290) | #71 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
|
||
|
13 Oct 2008, 15:31 (Ref:2311329) | #72 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
If you think of Peugeot as a race car constructor in the same light as Lola, and thier product is best out there at the moment it makes perfect sense for any team to want to run them.
Penske is better set up to attract sponsors than others I would suspect and is more than able to find the money to run it and return a profit. How about Audi + Penske as an alternative or Penske Lola Aston there is no shortage of options. As long as he is in the P1 class with a chance of winning does it matter what he runs? |
||
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better. H S Thompson 1937 - 2005 |
13 Oct 2008, 16:40 (Ref:2311368) | #73 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Also in that is, arguably, Penske being the best person/organization/team to take on a very promising works/semi-works program and push it to its full potential. Which could make them very attractive to the likes of Peugeot as a customer.
But who knows? The Shadow Knows! L.P. |
||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
13 Oct 2008, 17:24 (Ref:2311407) | #74 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
13 Oct 2008, 17:36 (Ref:2311413) | #75 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
No, I'd bet more money on a Peugeot than a Toyota at this point. Speculation is a wonderful thing, we will however need to just wait and see who or what happens. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paddock! | mattray | Racers Forum | 24 | 22 Mar 2007 10:37 |
Spa paddock help. | Adam43 | Trackside | 11 | 28 Apr 2004 14:31 |
paddock access | calcium | Bike Racing | 20 | 27 Feb 2002 20:12 |