Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 Jul 2004, 15:26 (Ref:1037358)   #1
qaz
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 66
qaz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
power to weight ratio

hows it calculated? its most probably easy but i am a muppet so forgive me!!
qaz is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2004, 16:34 (Ref:1037417)   #2
Mackmot
Veteran
 
Mackmot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
United Kingdom
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 2,188
Mackmot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
power:weight
BHP:Tons

Standard Road Car
160BHP:2ton
1ton/2ton x 160BHP
=80BHP per ton

F1 car
800BHP:0.7ton
1ton/0.7ton x 800BHP
=1142BHP per ton
Mackmot is offline  
__________________
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Quote
Old 16 Jul 2004, 08:51 (Ref:1037919)   #3
zefarelly
Veteran
 
zefarelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
European Union
Posts: 9,710
zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!
my car now . . . .120BHP 765Kg = 158 BHP per ton

when I've spent an arm and a leg on an engine and removed underseal, beergut etc
. . . .150 BHP & 730 Kg = 205 BHP per ton (and the oputside possibility of a class win !
zefarelly is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jul 2004, 17:05 (Ref:1038354)   #4
MGDavid
Veteran
 
MGDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
England
Berkshire
Posts: 3,810
MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!MGDavid is going for a new lap record!
supplementary if I may - are these figures usually calculated using 'at-the-wheels' bhp or 'calculated flywheel' bhp ?
MGDavid is offline  
__________________
a salary slave no more...
Quote
Old 16 Jul 2004, 19:04 (Ref:1038473)   #5
listernoble
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
United Kingdom
Norfolk UK
Posts: 146
listernoble should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Usually at flywheel but exludes driver,which in my case seiously affects the final figure.
Engine 132 bhp,car 385 kgs,then me another 100 kgs!
Answer,massive diet or massive engine,guess which will win?
Lister
listernoble is offline  
__________________
Rattie,on the road with Mole.Beep,beep!
Quote
Old 17 Jul 2004, 20:55 (Ref:1039227)   #6
Red Dog
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
Poole, Dorset, UK
Posts: 207
Red Dog should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Lister your car is very light, what is it exactly?
Red Dog is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jul 2004, 07:37 (Ref:1039444)   #7
listernoble
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
United Kingdom
Norfolk UK
Posts: 146
listernoble should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I have just checked the set up sheets from Alan Stanniforth and unladen weight is actually lower than I said at 361 kgs or 799 lbs,
Car is a Ginetta G17 Formula 4 single seater,built 1969,space frame, Imp all alloy engine and gearbox.
Engine bored/stroked to 1098 running twin 40's and full race cam,gearbox has strengthened casing with a special diff casting , Jack Knight internals and LSD.
Used soley for sprints and hillclimbs since built.
Lister
listernoble is offline  
__________________
Rattie,on the road with Mole.Beep,beep!
Quote
Old 18 Jul 2004, 10:06 (Ref:1039497)   #8
listernoble
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
United Kingdom
Norfolk UK
Posts: 146
listernoble should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Red dog

It gets even better.
I've just found some corner weights after ride height adjustment following spring rate change.
Brian Wingfield Racing 13/08/02 - 782 lbs or 355 kgs.
If it goes on likwe this I will be airborne!
Lister
listernoble is offline  
__________________
Rattie,on the road with Mole.Beep,beep!
Quote
Old 19 Jul 2004, 09:53 (Ref:1040174)   #9
zefarelly
Veteran
 
zefarelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
European Union
Posts: 9,710
zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!
flippin hell thats light !

when I add myself to my car it doesnt look so good at all !

765Kg + 25 (fuel) + 90 (me and kit) = 880kg!

thats vauxhaul territory!
zefarelly is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2004, 18:52 (Ref:1049094)   #10
R59
Veteran
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Heard and McDonald Islands
Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,523
R59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridR59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
765Kg, sounds Nova/Corsa-ish.

My ol' Nova was 780 in Super Road Saloon spec, but is now about 760 in ModProd spec, with more to lose. Steve Quenby's used to tip the scales at just over 710 if memory serves me right.

Harry weighs 780Kg rolling without the engine, which weighs about 380lb (approx 170Kg),the gearbox, which weighs about 20Kg, the air jacks, which weigh about 20Kg, exhaust headers and system, fuel, oil, water, and other odds & sods, and it's got to be under 1100Kg at the track. BHP - about 740 at the flywheel. Fun fun fun fun fun.

And one final shot - BHP at the wheels versus flywheel - for front wheel drive cars with synchro (helical cut gears) gearboxes, lose 21% of your flywheel power through the box and diff. Dog boxes, straight cut, typically 10% loss.
For those new to the subject....

Rob.
R59 is offline  
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!!
A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!!
Quote
Old 28 Jul 2004, 13:41 (Ref:1049857)   #11
zefarelly
Veteran
 
zefarelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
European Union
Posts: 9,710
zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!
the only vauxhaul I'm likely to race against is a VX4/90, I think they weigh about a ton and a half, plus paint and filler, less corrosion . . .so about a ton and a half !

dunno about rear wheel drive losses though
zefarelly is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jul 2004, 14:42 (Ref:1049908)   #12
listernoble
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
United Kingdom
Norfolk UK
Posts: 146
listernoble should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
dunno about rear wheel drive losses though

I think it is about the same,you still have all the same components,plus a prop shaft .
Lister
listernoble is offline  
__________________
Rattie,on the road with Mole.Beep,beep!
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
compression ratio gttouring Racing Technology 35 15 Nov 2009 14:57
Power / weight ratio racing ger80 National & Club Racing 26 12 Dec 2005 20:07
3.15 Diff Ratio for Bathurst Dazz Australasian Touring Cars. 24 27 Feb 2005 20:12


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.