Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Other Motorsports > Bike Racing

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 22 May 2007, 03:19 (Ref:1918473)   #1
Schummy
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Schummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location:
Somewhere near 2nd Lagrangian point
Posts: 3,259
Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!
Tour of FIM

In these days the Giro di Italia(?) is running through Italy (obviously) (and visiting racing circuits, BTW) (this succession of parenthesis is bad style), and in two months time we will have the Tour de France. The three big tours are exciting events.

Probably, in case someone is reading this, that someone is wondering how this nonsense is going to relate with bike racing. First of all they use (motorless) bikes in those Tours; secondly in the next paragraph I'll introduce the prober bike racing element.

I have thought (so to speak) that it could be interesting (let's define "interesting" another day) to have a time-aggregate classification in FIM GPs, just as they do in cycling.

Ok, in rallying they do the same, but we know rallying is not proper racing at all , it is rather more like slot racing . So come back to cycling, err... bike racing.

Time-aggregation has the big difficulty that one DNF means an automatic exclusion of the classification. So I have thought a scheme of non-counting worst results. I have "decided" to drop the worst half of results, meaning the worst (n-1)/2 results if n is odd, and the worst (n-2)/2 if n is even. So more than 50% of results are retained.

In each race, a difference in (whole) seconds respect the winner is done. Then we drop the worst results and we sum the rest. It will be the total time for the rider.

For example, Rossi has done so far:
QAT 3"
SPA 0"
TUR 19"
CHI 3"
FRA 54"

We drop TUR and CHI, and so his total time is 6". Stoner's time is 0", so Rossi is now 6 seconds behind Stoner. Easy? Probably not, but I have tried it.

Well, anyway, the classifications are as follows:
Code:
              0"  10"  20"  30"  40"  50"  60"
MotoGP:
              |
Stoner     0" <CS>
Rossi      6" |  <VR>
Pedrosa   23" |           <DP>
Melandri  38" |                  <MM>
Vermeulan 48" |                          <TE>
Elias     53" |
              |

250cc:
              |
Lorenzo   0"  <JL>
Dovizioso 0"  <AD>
Bautista  4   | <AB>
Angelis   9"  |   <AA>
              |

125cc:
              |
Pesek    0"   <LP>
Talmacsi 1"   |<GT>
Corsi    1"   |<SC>
Faubel   6"   |  <HF>
Gadea    8"   |   <SG>
              |
              0"  10"  20"  30"  40"  50"  60"
Schummy is offline  
Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FIM / AMA Super X... gomick Bike Racing 4 16 Jan 2006 08:29
A little game about FIM GPs? Schummy Bike Racing 11 15 Apr 2005 08:44
FIM GP Donington Schummy Bike Racing 11 15 Jul 2003 10:39
Best FIM riders so far (IMHO) Schummy Bike Racing 2 3 Jul 2003 11:45
FIM v. AMA KC Bike Racing 1 29 Nov 2002 03:56


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:51.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.