Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 Mar 2002, 00:23 (Ref:234662)   #1
dedieux
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location:
Canada
Posts: 5
dedieux should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Engine Efficiency

Is it true that putting "magnets" around the air and fuel intakes of an engine increases its efficiency and reduces its exaust gases?

Can anyone explain the science behind this?

Please take a look at the following:

http://www.eureka.findlay.co.uk/arch...ts/Magnets.htm

http://www.wholly-water.com/d.cgi/BO...etizerAuto.htm

http://www.akra.pl/politechang.htm
dedieux is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Mar 2002, 04:05 (Ref:241324)   #2
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
bloody good question.Alot of experts rubbish it(idiots-they didn't even try to think about it)Some suposedly sensible,independant people have tested these sorts of things & if i remember rightly,some of the results were definitely positive.Did they test them properly?!Who knows.

Incedently there was a similar magnetic device available for farm irrigation water.The idea was that it ionized the water(more negatively(?)charged atoms if i remember right?)which then bonded more readily with the anions(or was that cations) in the soil thereby making water use more efficient for the plant.Having said that,they may have quoted the an independant goverment scientist out of context.(He stated that the theory would work but-how long does the effect last along the irrigation pipe while on the way to the field?!...2km?100m?2cm?!)they didn't quote ANY tests or results to do with the OVERALL effect or results.


Now...a motor is abit different from soil(oh really?) but i can imagine a few ways that magnitizing may help.I too would be interested in the true theory & results anyone has had
RWC is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Mar 2002, 02:58 (Ref:242114)   #3
DavyboyLT1
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 172
DavyboyLT1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Car and Driver (or maybe R&T) magazine did a test with these magnets a few years back (sorry, I don't remember which issue).

They didn't find any substantial gains in performance or efficiency, I recall.
DavyboyLT1 is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Mar 2002, 03:37 (Ref:243338)   #4
DAVID PATERSON
Veteran
 
DAVID PATERSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Posts: 5,549
DAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Two atoms bumped into each other, and this ensued.

1. Gee, I'm sorry mate, are you OK?
2. No, I think I've lost an electron.
1. Are you sure?
2. Yes I'm positive.

DAVID PATERSON is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Mar 2002, 03:56 (Ref:243341)   #5
DavyboyLT1
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 172
DavyboyLT1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Now that's VERY witty!
DavyboyLT1 is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Mar 2002, 16:09 (Ref:243686)   #6
KC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
United States
Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 2,762
KC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I know that ionizing water can alter its flow and absorption rates due to the reduction in surface tension. I have seen ionizing systems for swimming pools that do this. It also allows heavy elements, such as iron, to be easily filtered out. The Wire Electric Discharge Machines I ran at my previous job used ionized water to control iron content to reduce rust and oxidation on the work pieces and improve conductivity.

I doubt that using a magnet alters airflow very much because it would not be powerful enough. I have seen all kinds of "black boxes" sold here in the US that supposedly increase efficiency, improve power and mileage without using power from the car and none have ever proved to anything other than snake oil scams.
KC is offline  
__________________
Never forget #99
Quote
Old 5 Apr 2002, 10:49 (Ref:252570)   #7
Izzy
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Auckland New Zealand
Posts: 26
Izzy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Early last year at tec (I’m doing a dip. in applied technology) we where given 4 sets of these magnets (MAGNETIZER) to test on different cars. The idea is you put one magnet around the air intake witch negatively charges it and one around the fuel line (positive charge). When the fuel and air meet they are attracted to each other and burn more efficiently. We dyno tested the cars first, fitted the magnets then dyno tested them again. I can’t remember the exact figures but I know there was a gain in horsepower. I’ll get and get the figures when I get back to tec.
Izzy is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Apr 2002, 13:00 (Ref:252686)   #8
av8rirl
Veteran
 
av8rirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Ireland
Ireland
Posts: 1,168
av8rirl should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Izzy: That is interesting. Try to dig out the figures and maybe give some more info on the magnets.
av8rirl is offline  
__________________
Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional.
Quote
Old 5 Apr 2002, 13:13 (Ref:252694)   #9
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Izzy that makes sense.
RWC is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Apr 2002, 08:32 (Ref:253235)   #10
DavyboyLT1
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 172
DavyboyLT1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by av8rirl
Izzy: That is interesting. Try to dig out the figures and maybe give some more info on the magnets.
I'd like to see some more info too.

I would assume that the magnets would need to be fairly powerful, though. Like I said, though I'm assuming.

The magazine test that I remembered (see my earlier post) involved a commercially available product at the time (early '90's, I believe).
DavyboyLT1 is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Apr 2002, 14:37 (Ref:253484)   #11
Italian
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location:
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3
Italian should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Im still confused how magnets help improve Engine Effieceny.

Is it an magnetic field that attracts the properties of fuel and the air intake?
Which would obvisouly lead to a better burn of the fuel. And giving more power to the engine, like the very old trains the more fire wood, more power. isnt how it works? :confused:
Italian is offline  
__________________
**Forza Ferrari**
**Forza Trulli**
**Forza Fisichella**
**Forza Italia**
Quote
Old 7 Apr 2002, 00:37 (Ref:253882)   #12
Osella
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,204
Osella should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Are these devices legal on racing cars?
Osella is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Apr 2002, 01:23 (Ref:253904)   #13
Italian
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location:
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3
Italian should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I would have to presume so its a magnet...

Anyone gotta a better reason? :confused:
Italian is offline  
__________________
**Forza Ferrari**
**Forza Trulli**
**Forza Fisichella**
**Forza Italia**
Quote
Old 7 Apr 2002, 16:46 (Ref:254229)   #14
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If that magnets on the intake air & fuel thing was to work it would be from better fuel/air mixing.Because opposite charges attract.They allready use charged droplets in spraying coatings in manufacturing(including normal paint) and in agricultural spraying(droplets attracted to the tree)
RWC is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Apr 2002, 08:15 (Ref:257012)   #15
slaiman
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1
slaiman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Engine Efficiency

Yupp..it does works !!

don ask me how.....i got one of those stuff a long time back....it was in 1998, I used it in my Ford Laser 1.3 and the mileage improved, for the first 2 weeks it was not effective after that there was abt 15% improvement.

I would say go for it....man !!!
slaiman is offline  
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help I need an engine Andrew Jones Club Level Single Seaters 2 4 Oct 2004 07:37
Engine Edmonton Formula One 20 19 May 2003 23:55
CVT -- engine RPM engstudent Racing Technology 39 19 Nov 2002 09:47
Jaguar gets new engine. Jordan gets old engine! Adam43 Formula One 13 29 Sep 2002 16:50


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.