|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
2 Aug 2006, 08:22 (Ref:1670656) | #26 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
I honestly thought that Pescarolo would win this year , pity they didnt but that Bouchet thing soured the whole affair for me , what goes around !!! As for the rules about design , i feel that they could have done a better job but since its the only racing that im interested in , i had better stay quite and suffer it . At least they dont look like DP's ..... yet !!! |
|||
|
2 Aug 2006, 18:02 (Ref:1671252) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,217
|
Apathy is what I have towards Le Mans now. This is mainly due to the fact I am not interested in watching one manufacturer win.
I didn't watch Le Mans this year, and I made no attempt to find out about it at any stage. It's just boring. I have followed the information about the Audi R10 here, and I saw the pictures of it. I don't know why Audi spent so much money on the car - give me 10 bucks and half an hour and I'll walk around an R8 wacking it with the Ugly stick and there you have it -an R10. I guess you can argue the car won in its first year - if your a pedant - but really this is just monotony continuing; Audi have been at Le Mans since 1999, and they have won it every year since then. What's remarkable or exciting about that. Try and promote that - put it on a poster - get the fans in.. and tell them the R10 won in its first year and nobody will know or care. To my knowledge the only car that won Le Mans in its first year was the McLaren. - {puts spleen back in} |
||
|
2 Aug 2006, 20:38 (Ref:1671466) | #28 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,812
|
|
||
|
6 Aug 2006, 17:09 (Ref:1675652) | #29 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,936
|
haha tuchet splatz and amen to that
|
||
|
6 Aug 2006, 17:20 (Ref:1675667) | #30 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
6 Aug 2006, 20:08 (Ref:1675859) | #31 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,390
|
Quote:
BTW the Mclaren was far from the only car to win on its LM debut - For starters there was the Porsche 956, Mazda 787, TWR / Joest WSC95, Porsche 911 GT1-98, BMW LMR and for that matter the Audi R8 |
|||
|
6 Aug 2006, 20:14 (Ref:1675864) | #32 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,598
|
Ferrari 166 MM and Chenard & Walcker too
The suggestion (or point of view) above is that the R8 wasn't new! If that is the case then we have to rule out things like the Jaguar C-Type, 911 GT1 and others for being (however slight) developments of a previous Le Mans racer. It seems a little harsh too do that. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
6 Aug 2006, 21:55 (Ref:1676000) | #33 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,390
|
Quote:
Not harsh - just wrong! |
|||
|
6 Aug 2006, 22:08 (Ref:1676013) | #34 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,598
|
It depends on your definition of new car. I agree with you, but can see the oother side too.
It obviously can't just be in a name because otherwise the XJR12 in 1990 won first time. Sticking with Jaguar do we count the C-Type as a first time winner, it was a XK120C and was based on the standard XK120 that ran the previous year? I'm not sure I'd count the 911GT1-98 or Mazda, but probably would the R8. Undoubtedly the McLaren was definitely a winner first time at Le Mans. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
8 Aug 2006, 09:05 (Ref:1677415) | #35 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
8 Aug 2006, 14:59 (Ref:1677665) | #36 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 391
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"It's a grand old team to play for, it's a grand old team to support: and if you know your history, it's enough to make your heart go..." |
8 Aug 2006, 15:37 (Ref:1677682) | #37 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,390
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
8 Aug 2006, 19:44 (Ref:1677864) | #38 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,306
|
Toyota couldn't win at all. Tell them "it's no big deal."
|
|
|
8 Aug 2006, 20:37 (Ref:1677897) | #39 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 757
|
Quote:
You can say they only shared the engine and transmission, imho. |
|||
|
9 Aug 2006, 08:33 (Ref:1678196) | #40 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 767
|
Didn't some of the lae 962s have a carbon tub?
|
|
|
9 Aug 2006, 15:39 (Ref:1678495) | #41 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Yep , but they didnt win at Le Mans . Schuppan-Brun-Kremer were carbon chassis amongst others . But no works carbon chassis . The closest to a carbon works chassis was the Kremer 962 of Stuck-Boutsen-Bouchet . Run by Kremer but backed in a big way from Porsche .
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Audi's DTM dominance continues | SJ Spode | Touring Car Racing | 6 | 10 May 2002 08:30 |
Most spectacular drive since 1998 | DMC | Formula One | 38 | 16 Mar 2002 22:59 |
Who will beat the works Audi's? | rdjones | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5 | 15 Jun 2001 14:41 |
Dosent the future of VAUXHALL look like AUDI's | vauxhall | Touring Car Racing | 5 | 8 Mar 2001 21:17 |