Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > My Track Designs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 Jul 2008, 10:57 (Ref:2257686)   #1
shambles
Veteran
 
shambles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
England
Soton, UK
Posts: 1,119
shambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridshambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
New Imola (Videos)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QrX7Xa1Iyw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLkrV-Lk-u8
shambles is offline  
__________________
I've just signed for MasterCard Lola....
Quote
Old 26 Jul 2008, 21:00 (Ref:2258270)   #2
nickyf1
Veteran
 
nickyf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Scotland
City of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Posts: 4,767
nickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridnickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
nice, cheers for that
nickyf1 is offline  
__________________
'My lovely horse, running through the fields! Where are you going, with your fetlocks blowing in the wind?'
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2008, 21:13 (Ref:2258672)   #3
werner
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2006
Netherlands
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 1,706
werner should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridwerner should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Did they tighten the variante alta!? That seems to be much slower than it used to be. That's a shame. The new S/F-area looks cool, but they might have done something different with the pit-entry. I doubt a wheel-to-wheel-fight is very comfortable when you're on the right side.
werner is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2008, 22:33 (Ref:2258714)   #4
Flaming_Wuzzle
Racer
 
Flaming_Wuzzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United States
a house
Posts: 448
Flaming_Wuzzle should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by werner
Did they tighten the variante alta!? That seems to be much slower than it used to be.
They did, but that happened around 2006, I think.
Flaming_Wuzzle is offline  
__________________
Eagles may soar, but BRMs don't get sucked into jet engines.
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2008, 22:36 (Ref:2258716)   #5
bio
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Hungary
Budapest, Hungary, Europe
Posts: 1,909
bio should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yep, in 2006:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:G...no_Changes.svg
bio is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jul 2008, 08:10 (Ref:2258796)   #6
Fish_Flake
Veteran
 
Fish_Flake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Georgia
The Foothills of North Georgia
Posts: 1,456
Fish_Flake should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridFish_Flake should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridFish_Flake should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I still would like to see the Villeneuve chicane eliminated, but it's progress.
Fish_Flake is offline  
__________________
"There are some players who have psychologists, sportologists. I smoke."
--golfer Angel Cabrera, when asked how he kept his composure whilst winning the 2007 U.S. Open, beating Tiger Woods by one stroke.
Quote
Old 28 Jul 2008, 11:05 (Ref:2258914)   #7
mclaren2007
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 44
mclaren2007 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
See my tracks thread for an edit.
mclaren2007 is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jul 2008, 11:21 (Ref:2258926)   #8
nickyf1
Veteran
 
nickyf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Scotland
City of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Posts: 4,767
nickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridnickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree with you there Fish.

Is anyone else with me when i say that all of this safety is not necesary for F1? I mean, look at Kubica's horrifying accident at Montreal last season, a corner with no gravel, or tarmac run off, a flat out kink and a concrete wall. He survived, and this is only a freak accident. So are all these acres of tarmac run offs necessary? Roland Ratzenberger went off at a similar corner in a sort of similar way (front wheels lifted in the air) so this shows that F1 has become more safe, car structure wise. Anyone else agree?

now ive went off topic...
nickyf1 is offline  
__________________
'My lovely horse, running through the fields! Where are you going, with your fetlocks blowing in the wind?'
Quote
Old 28 Jul 2008, 13:36 (Ref:2259034)   #9
the sniper
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
European Union
Birmingham
Posts: 682
the sniper has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
I can see why there has been complaints about the pit lane entry, it looks really quiet dangerous!
the sniper is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Jul 2008, 16:40 (Ref:2260379)   #10
Fish_Flake
Veteran
 
Fish_Flake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Georgia
The Foothills of North Georgia
Posts: 1,456
Fish_Flake should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridFish_Flake should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridFish_Flake should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickyf1
I agree with you there Fish.

Is anyone else with me when i say that all of this safety is not necesary for F1? I mean, look at Kubica's horrifying accident at Montreal last season, a corner with no gravel, or tarmac run off, a flat out kink and a concrete wall. He survived, and this is only a freak accident. So are all these acres of tarmac run offs necessary? Roland Ratzenberger went off at a similar corner in a sort of similar way (front wheels lifted in the air) so this shows that F1 has become more safe, car structure wise. Anyone else agree?

now ive went off topic...
The thing about the Villeneuve chicane is that while it was the point of the track where the highest speeds were reached in 1994, Formula 1 cars had been entering the kink at the end of a mile-long section of track that was full-throttle. Adding the chicane at Tamburello bisected that flat-out run, so speeds would be down around 20 MPH there anyway. Plus, the circuit expanded the run-off area for the Villeneuve chicane, so they could have done the same for the kink.

Altering the Variante Bassa after Barrichello's accident was a matter of common sense: there was no reason for that first right-left combo to be there in the first place, and certainly not with that high curbing. There had been serious accidents at Tamburello before Senna's crash, so altering that corner was inevitable. But the Villeneuve chicane was and is a knee-jerk reaction made under the notion that a driver died there, so something must be done. In reality, if a driver went off at a restored kink in 1995, the improved side-cockpit protection and reduced corner entry speeds made it very likely that he would walk away from it. The same remains true today.
Fish_Flake is offline  
__________________
"There are some players who have psychologists, sportologists. I smoke."
--golfer Angel Cabrera, when asked how he kept his composure whilst winning the 2007 U.S. Open, beating Tiger Woods by one stroke.
Quote
Old 30 Jul 2008, 20:30 (Ref:2260523)   #11
Purist
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
United States
Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 5,892
Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!
Given how close the walls are around parts of Eau Rouge even today, the run-off at the old Tamburello doesn't seem that out of line. The high curb prevented the gravel from scrubbing off speed in Senna's crash.

Even with the Variente Bassa gone, the chicane at Tamburello isn't profiled to be conducive to overtaking. Also, I'm not convinced, even if you removed the Villeneuve Chicane, that you would see passing into Tosa without a flat-out Tamburello. Unless you have the room to get a run going and set up the guy in front before you get to that right-hand bend ahead of Tosa, that bend will foul up most attempts at passing made right before Tosa.
Purist is offline  
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain.
Quote
Old 30 Jul 2008, 21:00 (Ref:2260537)   #12
shambles
Veteran
 
shambles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
England
Soton, UK
Posts: 1,119
shambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridshambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
They need to re-profile the Tamburello chicane because as Purist says it's not really the kind of lap after lap overtaking spot you'd like to see there.

We all know that they'll never re-instate the original Tamburello although I don't see why it shouldn't be feasible from all angles other than perhaps a certain sentimentality. I'd love to see an Imola back on full song; in it's heydey it was truly one of the greatest racing circuits we've ever seen.
shambles is offline  
__________________
I've just signed for MasterCard Lola....
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Videos Magical Trevor Cool Sites 5 28 Dec 2004 14:33
Dump Imola / change Imola Sodemo Formula One 12 28 Apr 2004 11:53


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.